番鸭呼肠孤病毒的分离与鉴定

从番鸭肝“白点病”患鸭的肝脾匀浆中分离到 7个病毒分离株 .在电镜下观察到病毒粒子呈球形 ,无囊膜 ,有可见的双层衣壳结构 ,外壳直径 75nm,内核直径 50 nm;病毒核酸型为 RNA;不凝集鸡、鸭、兔、豚鼠红细胞 ,与禽呼肠孤病毒有一定的抗原相关性 ;对番鸭胚和鸡胚成纤维细胞可致感染细胞圆缩、融合 ,出现多核细胞和巨细胞 ,胞浆内有近核包涵体 ;试验感染 1日龄敏感雏番鸭死亡率达 10 0 % ,临床及病理变化与自然感染发病的番鸭基本一致 ,并可回收到该病毒 .结果表明 ,目前国内流行的番鸭肝“白点病”病原为呼肠孤病毒科正呼肠孤病毒属番鸭呼肠孤病毒     

褐飞虱呼肠孤病毒干扰水稻锯齿叶矮缩病毒的初步研究

褐飞虱(Nilaparvata lugens Stal)可携带多种病毒,其中褐飞虱呼肠孤病毒(Nilaparvata lugens reovirus,NLRV)和水稻锯齿叶矮缩病毒(Rice ragged stunt virus,RRSV)均为ds RNA基因组的呼肠孤病毒。通过接种、ds RNA小量提取及RT-PCR等方法分析NLRV对RRSV传播和增殖的影响,初步探讨这两种呼肠孤病毒之间的关系。结果表明,褐飞虱携带NLRV比率高低影响褐飞虱接种RRSV效率;携带NLRV的褐飞虱种群接种RRSV后两种病毒的含量差异较大,NLRV的含量远远大于RRSV的含量,推测褐飞虱体内的NLRV某种程度上干扰了RRSV的传播和增殖。     

草鱼呼肠孤病毒逆转录环介导等温扩增检测方法的建立

为更加快速、灵敏地检测草鱼呼肠孤病毒(Grass Carp Reovirus,GCRV),建立环介导等温扩增(RT-LAMP)检测方法。根据GenBank中GCRV HZ08等毒株VP6蛋白基因序列设计引物,以GCRV弱毒疫苗株(GCHV-892)总RNA为模板建立RT-LAMP反应,对扩增产物用限制性内切酶PvuⅡ进行酶切鉴定,所得酶切产物大小符合预期值。随后对LAMP反应体系包括Mg2+、dNTPs、甜菜碱(betaine)和内外引物浓度比进行了优化,并以含VP6蛋白基因的重组质粒(pEASY-VP6)为模板考量了该方法的敏感性,结果显示最低检测限为10copies.μL-1,比RT-PCR检测方法敏感10倍。特异性试验表明与白斑综合征病毒(WSSV)、嗜水气单胞菌(Aeromonas hydrophila)、病毒性神经坏死病毒(VNNV)无交叉反应。应用RT-LAMP方法检测16份疑似出血病草鱼,6份病料获得了阳性扩增,与RT-PCR检测结果一致。     

应用dsRNA测序技术检测草鱼呼肠孤病毒的混合感染

从草鱼(Ctenopharyngodon idellus)出血病疑似病料提取物感染的草鱼肾细胞(CIK)中提取病毒基因组dsRNA,电泳显示出水生呼肠孤病毒基因组的典型特征。应用简化的FLAC(full-length amplification of cDNA)技术扩增得到病毒的4个全长基因组片段进行测序分析。核酸序列BLAST分析表明:其中3个基因组片段与GCRV-873第5、9、10片段高度同源,另外1个基因组片段与GCRV-HZ08第11片段高度同源;因此推测病料中同时存在两种不同的病毒核酸,但也可能存在一种杂合病毒。根据已发表的GCRV-HZ08第5、9、10片段设计了3对引物对分离的病毒总RNA进行RT-PCR检测并测序,结果显示这3个片段与GCRV-HZ08第5、9、10片段均具有99%同源性,表明是由于混合感染而存在两株不同病毒的核酸dsRNA,两株病毒分别命名为GCRV-JX01和GCRV-JX02。首次运用dsRNA测序法检测出了GCRV病毒的混合感染,为草鱼呼肠孤病毒的流行病学和防控提供了一种新的技术选择。     

番鸭呼肠孤病毒和H9亚型禽流感病毒共感染对番鸭法氏囊和抗体产生的影响

为探讨番鸭呼肠孤病毒(MDRV)和H9亚型禽流感病毒(H9 AIV)共感染对番鸭法氏囊免疫应答能力的影响,本研究将MDRV或/和H9 AIV人工感染8日龄番鸭,观察法氏囊病理组织学变化,检测法氏囊B细胞增殖能力及RE-5 AIV疫苗免疫后抗体变化规律.结果显示:H9 AIV感染组番鸭发病率低(10％),无死亡,法氏囊无病理变化,显著抑制番鸭法氏囊细胞增殖反应;MDRV感染番鸭发病率70％,死亡率40％,生长迟缓,法氏囊病理变化为萎缩,淋巴细胞减少,局部出现范围较小的坏死灶,番鸭法氏囊细胞增殖反应下降;共感染组番鸭发病率100％,死亡率80％,番鸭生长迟缓,法氏囊萎缩和淋巴细胞增殖反应下降程度均比单一病毒感染组严重.病毒感染使番鸭对RE-5 AIV疫苗免疫应答能力明显下降,其共感染组抑制抗体应答程度最严重;共感染组的病毒检出时间早于并且检出率大于单一病毒感染组.表明MDRV与H9 AIV共感染在番鸭免疫应答抑制方面有协同作用.     

新型鸭呼肠孤病毒在DF-1细胞系中的增殖特性

为了研究新型鸭呼肠孤病毒(new-type duck reovirus,NDRV)在鸡胚成纤维细胞DF-1中的增殖特性,将NDRV JDM10毒株接种到DF-1细胞,连续传代后,通过观察病毒对细胞的致病变效应,测定半数组织感染量(TCID₅₀)、RT-PCR检测、间接免疫荧光(IFA)及Western-blot免疫学检测,探索NDRV对DF-1细胞的作用效果。结果表明,NDRV JDM10毒株在DF-1细胞中能有效增殖,产生明显的致病变效应;RT-PCR检测成功扩增出1条大小为1 001 bp的条带;病毒蛋白在细胞中获得了良好的表达,并与抗NDRV σC单克隆抗体发生特异性反应;NDRV JDM10毒株在感染DF-1细胞后会经历潜伏期、快速增长期、稳定期3个时期,并在72 h病毒效价达到峰值,TCID₅₀为1×10^-7.90·(0.1mL)^-1。本研究为进一步研究NDRV的致病机理和研制细胞疫苗奠定了基础。     

禽呼肠孤病毒C-98分离株L1基因的克隆与序列分析

参考禽呼肠孤病毒S1133株（GenBank）L1基因序列设计3对特异性引物,采用RT-PCR方法对禽呼肠孤病毒内蒙古分离株C-98的L1基因进行了克隆和序列测定。结果表明：获得的C-98 L1基因全长3959 bp,其中包括21 bp的5’非编码区和56 bp的3’非编码区,阅读框位于5’端第22位核苷酸与3’端第3903位核苷酸之间。将C-98株与国内外禽呼肠孤病毒群和哺乳动物呼肠孤病毒群的不同分离株进行序列比较,结果显示：C-98与台湾地区分离株919和美国分离株1733、2408、S1133亲缘关系最近,其核苷酸同源性分别为99.8%、99.7%、99.7%、99.4%;与哺乳动物呼肠孤病毒L3基因核苷酸及其编码的氨基酸同源性较低,为43%～45%。     

Oncolytic reovirus therapy: Pilot study in dogs with spontaneously occurring tumours

Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel treatment involving replication‐competent virus in the elimination of cancer. We have previously reported the oncolytic effects of reovirus in various canine cancer cell lines. This study aims to establish the safety profile of reovirus in dogs with spontaneously occurring tumours and to determine a recommended dosing regimen. Nineteen dogs with various tumours, mostly of advanced stages, were treated with reovirus, ranging from 1.0 × 10⁸ to 5.0 × 10⁹ TCID₅₀ given as intratumour injection (IT) or intravenous infusion (IV) daily for up to 5 consecutive days in 1 or multiple treatment cycles. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group‐ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (VCOG‐CTCAE) v1.1 guidelines. Viral shedding, neutralizing anti‐reovirus antibody (NARA) production and immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of reovirus protein in the tumours were also assessed. AE was not observed in most dogs and events were limited to Grade I or II fever, vomiting, diarrhoea and inflammation of the injected tumour. No infectious virus was shed and all dogs had elevated NARA levels post‐treatment. Although IHC results were only available in 6 dogs, 4 were detected positive for reovirus protein. In conclusion, reovirus is well‐tolerated and can be given safely to tumour‐bearing dogs according to the dosing regimen used in this study without significant concerns of viral shedding. Reovirus is also potentially effective in various types of canine tumours.     

草鱼出血病分子流行病学及GCRV多样性研究

[目的]分析不同基因型GCRV分离株与患草鱼出血病草鱼症状的相关性。[方法]采用RT-PCR检测患病草鱼,应用生物信息学方法分析基因型内和基因型间不同分离株间的差异。[结果]对近3年来草鱼出血病分子流行病学分析发现,患草鱼出血病病鱼多为"肠炎型"症状,且检测发现其病原多属于GCRV基因型Ⅲ型。对GCRV的多样性分析表明,不同分离株同源蛋白的同源率高达93%以上,却被给予完全不同的名称,给GCRV多样性研究带来一定的困难;同一基因型不同分离株同源蛋白间的变异位点较少,且功能位点发生变异的更少;不同基因型不同分离株同源蛋白间的保守位点较少,且这些保守位点中只有极少数位点为功能位点;不同基因型分离株同源结构蛋白间存在较大的差异,且同源非结构蛋白间的差异更为显著。[结论]草鱼出血病不同临床症状可能与其病原基因型不同有关。     

Development and application of molecular methods (PCR) for detection of Tasmanian Atlantic salmon reovirus

Molecular (PCR) diagnostic tests for the detection and identification of aquareovirus in general, and Tasmanian Atlantic salmon reovirus (TSRV) specifically, were developed, and their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were determined and compared with virus isolation in cell culture. Intralaboratory and interlaboratory comparison of PCR (conventional hemi‐nested RT‐PCR & RT‐qPCR) and virus isolation in cell culture using finfish cell lines, CHSE‐214 and EPC, was carried out for the detection and identification of TSRV using field samples of farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, L. from various aquaculture sites around Tasmania. The interlaboratory comparison of diagnostic methods was carried out between two laboratories, AAHL‐CSIRO and DPIPWE‐Tasmania. A total of 144 fish from nine sites (12–33 fish per site) were sampled from two regions of Tasmania (Tamar River estuary in the north and Huon River estuary in the south‐east) during late spring to early summer of 2009, and the data were analysed using different statistical approaches. The prevalence of TSRV ranged from 6% to 22% in both regions. All the diagnostic methods (data from both laboratories) had high specificity, while the estimated sensitivity varied between tests with RT‐qPCR being the most sensitive (95.2%) method followed by virus isolation and then conventional hemi‐nested RT‐PCR.