筛选猪瘟抗体阴性猪检测方法的比较

评价ELISA法用于筛选猪瘟抗体阴性猪的可行性,分别采用两种商品化猪瘟抗体ELISA检测试剂盒检测了61份猪血清样品,并与兔体中和试验方法进行了比较。兔体中和试验法检测出4份阳性、2份可疑、55份阴性,而两种ELISA试剂盒均检测出6份阳性、55份阴性;两种ELISA方法与兔体中和试验检测结果阴性符合率均为100%（55/55）。结果表明,ELISA法更加敏感,可以替代兔体中和试验方法用于筛选猪瘟抗体阴性猪。     

两种不同检测法对猪瘟抗体阴性猪筛检的比较

猪瘟抗体阴性猪是猪瘟活疫苗安检的重要实验动物,目前对于猪瘟抗体阴性猪筛选是采用兔体中和反应法,实验复杂,工作量大并且易受实验兔个体差异等因素影响。随着生物学及其技术的发展,ELISA被广泛用于生物制品的各个领域。本试验应用ELISA法和兔体中和反应法对猪瘟抗体阴性猪进行筛选,共检测160份血清,检测结果显示两种方法结果有很高的一致性,但ELISA法更为敏感,快捷,更适用于猪瘟抗体阴性猪的筛选。     

应用三种方法筛选猪瘟抗体阴性猪的比较试验

为了寻找筛选猪瘟抗体阴性猪更简便的方法,本试验应用猪瘟中和试验(SN)、阻断ELISA和正向间接血凝(IHA)三种方法分别对170份未经猪瘟活疫苗免疫的仔猪血清进行猪瘟抗体检测。结果显示,SN、ELISA和IHA检测出的猪瘟阴性血清分别为144份、150份和131份,表明三种检测方法有较好的符合率,其中SN与ELISA的检测符合率为90.59%,SN与IHA的检测符合率为82.94%,而ELISA法与另两种方法比较阴性符合率最高。本结果表明,ELISA法具有较高的敏感性,适合应用于猪瘟活疫苗安全检验抗体阴性猪的筛选。     

比较两种ELISA试剂盒在猪伪狂犬病血清抗体检测中的一致性

比较两种ELISA试剂盒检测结果的一致性,为流行病学调查和临床诊断筛选适合的商品化试剂盒。采用来自两个厂家的野毒抗体(gE)和免疫抗体(gB)ELISA检测试剂盒分别检测362份和392份猪血清,应用Kappa检验比较试验数据的一致性。结果显示:两种猪伪狂犬病抗体(g E)检测试剂盒联合检测出95份抗体阳性和256份阴性,符合率97.24%,结果一致性为极强(Kappa值0.932);两种猪伪狂犬病抗体(gB)检测试剂盒联合检测出351份抗体阳性和9份阴性,符合率91.84%,一致性为弱(Kappa值0.347)。以上结果说明,两种猪伪狂犬病抗体(gE)检测试剂盒都适用于PRV gE抗体检测,而两种猪伪狂犬病抗体(gB)检测试剂金差异较大,需慎重选择。     

两种猪瘟病毒ELISA抗体检测试剂盒对疫苗免疫猪血清抗体检测的比较试验

为了比较两种猪瘟病毒抗体检测试剂盒对猪瘟疫苗免疫抗体的检测结果,本试验将27头猪瘟抗体阴性仔猪免疫猪瘟活疫苗后7、10、14、17、20、23、27、30、34 d共9个时间点采血,分别用两种猪瘟病毒ELISA抗体检测试剂盒进行抗体检测,同时采用OIE指定方法-荧光抗体病毒中和试验对检测结果进行验证。结果表明,虽然两种试剂盒均可在免疫后30 d 100%检测到免疫猪体内的猪瘟抗体,但国产试剂盒在疫苗免疫后第10天便可在6/21猪体内检测到猪瘟抗体,20 d时抗体检测全为阳性,而美国IDEXX公司的试剂盒在疫苗免疫后27 d才在11/21猪体内检测到猪瘟抗体,30 d时才全部变为阳性,而两种试剂盒对6头阴性对照猪血清连续跟踪检测34 d均为阴性。由此可以得出结论:国产试剂盒在疫苗免疫后的早期抗体检测中敏感性明显高于IDEXX公司的试剂盒。     

猪瘟病毒5种ELISA抗体检测试剂盒的比较

[目的]比较猪瘟病毒（CSFV）5种ELISA抗体检测试剂盒的使用效果。[方法]利用细胞中和试验制备的标准质控血清,制备不同猪瘟抗体效价的阳性血清70份和阴性血清20份,对5种试剂盒的敏感性、特异性和符合率进行比较。利用该5种试剂盒对不同年龄段猪群血清中猪瘟抗体水平进行检测。[结果] 5种试剂盒的敏感性为85.7%-100%,特异性均达到100%,符合率为88.9%-100%。不同年龄段猪血清样品中,5种试剂盒检测结果不尽相同。[结论]猪瘟抗体效价的高低对5种试剂盒检测结果的一致性有一定影响,尤其是针对弱阳性样品时,IDEXX猪瘟抗体试剂盒和荷兰赛迪公司的猪瘟抗体试剂盒检测效果相对较好,为猪瘟免疫检测工作提供了一定依据。     

非洲猪瘟病毒抗体检测间接ELISA方法的建立

以基因工程表达的非洲猪瘟病毒VP73蛋白作为包被抗原,建立了间接ELISA方法,用以检测猪血清中抗非洲猪瘟VP73蛋白的抗体。该方法对非洲猪瘟标准阳性血清的检测灵敏度可以达到1∶2 560,与同类进口ELISA试剂盒相当。此方法只特异性检出非洲猪瘟阳性血清,而对猪传染性胸膜肺炎等5种猪传染病阳性血清的检测结果均为阴性,表明其具有良好的特异性。批内和批间重复性试验结果发现,检测同一份血清的变异系数小于10%,表明其重复性较好。包被好的酶标板37℃放置5d后,对同一份血清的检测敏感性无明显变化,初步表明其稳定性较好。利用建立的间接ELISA方法和进口ELISA试剂盒分别对150份血清样品进行非洲猪瘟血清抗体检测,结果表明本方法的特异性和敏感性分别为99.1%和94.3%,2种方法检测结果的符合率为98%。以上试验表明,本试验建立的间接ELISA方法具有良好的特异性和敏感性、较好的重复性和稳定性,可以满足临床检测的需求。     

应用ELISA方法检测非洲猪瘟抗体

为了验证ELISA方法检测非洲猪瘟抗体的可行性,在东莞市3个屠宰场采集92份猪血清,应用ELISA方法进行检测,结果为阴性和阳性质控均成立,非洲猪瘟抗体均为阴性。结果表明,ELISA方法操作简便,适合大规模样品非洲猪瘟抗体的监测。     

检测猪瘟病毒E0抗体间接ELISA方法的建立及其初步应用

应用RT-PCR技术扩增了猪瘟病毒的E0基因片段,并将其分别克隆到pGEX-4T-1与pET-28a载体,获得了pGEX-4T-1-E0与pET-28a-E0重组表达质粒。以IPTG诱导表达的纯化GST-E0和His-E0重组蛋白为包被抗原,建立检测猪瘟病毒E0抗体的间接ELISA方法。采用方阵滴定法,确定出GST-E0抗原和His-E0抗原的最佳包被量分别为50 ng/孔和100 ng/孔,血清最佳稀释度为160倍。对80份猪瘟阴性血清样品进行了检测与统计学分析,确定出GST-E0和His-E0重组蛋白的间接ELISA方法的临界值分别为0.167和0.176。特异性、敏感性和重复性试验结果表明,本试验建立的基于GST-E0和His-E0蛋白的间接ELISA方法均具有特异、敏感和重复性好等优点。应用GST-E0和His-E0的间接ELISA方法及IDEXX E2抗体检测试剂盒平行检测88份猪血清样品,结果显示基于GST-E0和His-E0的间接ELISA方法与IDEXX试剂盒的符合率分别为78.41%和84.09%。以猪瘟病毒接毒细胞为抗原,应用免疫荧光试验(IFA)对His-E0间接ELISA和IDEXX检测试剂盒检出的阴性与阳性血清样品进行了验证,结果IFA与His-E0间接ELISA方法的符合率为93.18%;IFA与IDEXX试剂盒的符合率为90.91%,表明本试验所建立的基于His-E0的间接ELISA方法用于检测猪瘟抗体优于IDEXX公司检测E2抗体的试剂盒。该方法为鉴别E2亚单位疫苗免疫后的猪群中是否存在野毒感染提供了技术手段。     

非洲猪瘟病毒p72蛋白阻断ELISA检测方法的建立

本研究旨在建立一种非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)p72蛋白阻断ELISA抗体检测方法。以纯化的重组p72蛋白作为包被抗原,HRP标记的6E5抗体作为阻断抗体,通过对反应条件进行优化,建立了基于ASFV p72蛋白的阻断ELISA方法。用建立的阻断ELISA方法检测119份临床阴性血清,计算血清阻断率确定临界值,确定了该方法的判定标准：当阻断率PI≥50%时判定为ASFV抗体阳性;PI≤40%时判定为ASFV抗体阴性;当阻断率介于两者之间时,判定为可疑。该方法与猪伪狂犬病病毒、猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒、猪瘟病毒、猪圆环病毒2型、A型塞内卡病毒、猪口蹄疫病毒、猪大肠杆菌、猪多杀性巴氏杆菌、副猪格拉瑟菌和猪胸膜肺炎放线杆菌的抗体阳性血清无交叉反应,批间、批内试验的变异系数均小于15%。用该方法与商品化ASFV抗体检测试剂盒同时检测447份猪临床血清样品,两种方法的相对敏感性和相对特异性分别为95.3%和94.5%,符合率为94.9%。本研究建立的阻断ELISA方法具有较高的敏感性和良好的特异性,可用于ASFV感染诊断和流行病学调查。     

猪乙型脑炎间接ELISA与血凝抑制试验方法的比较

用血凝抑制试验和间接ELISA两种方法检测乙脑阳性血清均呈阳性反应,检测乙脑阴性血清均呈阴性反应。用间接ELISA对来自9个猪场74份送检血清进行了猪乙脑病毒（Japanese encephalitis virus,JEV）抗体检测,并与血凝抑制试验（HI）进行对比,两种方法检测总符合率为85.1%(63/74),经统计分析,检测结果差异不显著(P＞0.05)。对来自无猪乙脑病猪场24头健康猪的血清进行检测,两种方法结果均为阴性,符合率为100%。对10份阳性血清进行检测,ELISA检测效价较HI效价高,表明ELISA比HI敏感。结果表明,ELISA与HI检测结果相符,前者更适用于猪血清中乙脑IgG抗体的大规模检测。     

Detection of pseudorabies virus DNA in individual single-reactor pigs found in certified pseudorabies-free herds

During monitoring of certified pseudorabies (PRV)-free herds to confirm their PRV -free status, occasional individual gE-seropositive pigs are detected. These single-reactor pigs remain gE-seropositive when further serum samples are collected and tested. For the eradication programme to proceed, it is important to determine whether these pigs are only false positives or are; in fact, infected with field PRV. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could detect field PRVDNA in single-reactor pigs and so confirm positive reactions in the serologic monitoring programme. First, DNA samples of various tissues from 15 single-reactor pigs all from different herds were examined for field PRV by PCR. Additionally, serum samples from these pigs were analyzed in a gE-confirmation enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (gE-confirmation ELISA). PCR detected PRVDNA in five of the 15 pigs, and these results were confirmed by the gE-confirmation ELISA. The remaining 10 pigs that tested negative in the PCR also tested negative in the gE- confirmation ELISA. We conclude that PCR can be used to discriminate between true and false serological positive single-reactor pigs and, moreover, that the gE-confirmation ELISA confirms these PCR results.     

Comparison of a commercial ELISA with the modified agglutination test for detection of Toxoplasma infection in the domestic pig

The modified agglutination test (MAT) and a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were compared for detection of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in naturally-infected market-aged pigs. Infected pigs were obtained from commercial slaughter facilities and from farms where infection had previously been detected. Infection was confirmed by bioassay in cats. For 70 bioassay positive pigs, 60 were positive by MAT (85.7% sensitivity) and 62 were positive by ELISA (88.6% sensitivity). Of 204 bioassay negative samples 193 were negative by MAT (94.6% specificity) and 200 were negative by ELISA (98.0% specificity). Good correlation was seen between MAT and ELISA results. The results suggest that the ELISA may be a good tool for epidemiological studies of Toxoplasma infection on pig farms.     

Evaluation of tongue inspection and serology for diagnosis of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine: usefulness of ELISA using purified glycoproteins and recombinant antigen

Evaluation of serology using glycoproteins (GPs) purified by preparative isoelectric focusing (pH 8.8) and recombinant chimeric antigen (RecTs) of Taenia solium was carried out using (1) blood samples on filter papers from pigs infected with different doses of eggs of T. solium in Mexico, (2) serum samples from pigs found infected naturally in Vietnam and Ecuador and (3) serum samples from pigs suspected to be infected with T. solium by tongue inspection in Tanzania. Antibody responses (IgG) were detectable in experimentally infected pigs confirmed harbouring 16 or more cysts at necropsy from 30 days after egg inoculation. One of three pigs naturally infected and harbouring 2.5 cysts/kg muscle and most of pigs harbouring=5.0 cysts/kg were also seropositive by ELISA. Although pigs may be infected with other taeniid species such as Taenia hydatigena, pigs harbouring this parasite were negative in ELISA. Approximately, 76 and 78% of sera from pigs having nodule(s) in the tongue (positive tongue inspection) were serologically positive by both ELISA and immunoblot, respectively. Furthermore, approximately 34 and 18% of sera from pigs having no nodules in the tongue (negative tongue inspection) were also seropositive by ELISA and immunoblot, respectively. ELISA using the two antigens was more sensitive than immunoblot and reliable for differentiation of pigs infected with cysticerci of T. solium from those either uninfected or infected with other taeniid species. Pigs without nodule by tongue inspection should be checked serologically in endemic areas.     

Infection trials in pigs with a human isolate of Brucella ( isolate 02/611 'marine mammal type' )

AIM: To determine if pigs could support infection of a human Brucella isolate (Brucella 02/611) from New Zealand, and to study seroconversion to this isolate using a competitive ELISA. METHODS: Ten weaner piglets were challenged with 4.8 x 10(8) cfu of organisms by the oral and ocular routes. Culture was attempted on blood samples taken prior to challenge, and 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 21 and 28 days post-challenge, and on tissue samples taken at the termination of the trial, 1 month after challenge. Sera were analysed for antibody using an ELISA. For reference comparison, similar trials were conducted in two pigs using an isolate of Brucella suis biovar 1, and two pigs using an isolate of B. suis biovar 3. RESULTS: Brucella 02/611 organisms were re-isolated from one lymph node each from three pigs; all other samples were negative. Low and transient antibody titres were detected using a competitive ELISA in three pigs, two of which were culture negative. Organisms of B. suis reference strains were re-isolated from multiple samples from each of the four animals. CONCLUSION: Brucella 02/611 does not seem to replicate readily in pigs. It is unlikely that pigs were the original maintenance hosts for Brucella 02/611.     

口蹄疫病毒A型竞争ELISA抗体检测试剂盒在流行病学调查中的应用

为评价口蹄疫病毒A型竞争ELISA(cELISA)抗体检测试剂盒在流行病学调查中的应用前景,对2017年从福建省三明市采集的336份黄牛、奶牛、羊和猪血清样品,用A型cELISA抗体检测试剂盒进行抗体检测。结果显示,92份黄牛血清、92份羊血清、92份猪血清、60份奶牛血清的A型抗体阳性率分别为13.04%、11.96%、20.65%、86.67%。从上述4种血清中,各挑选10份血清(阴性、阳性各5份)共40份,采用口蹄疫病毒液相阻断ELISA(LPB-ELISA)抗体检测试剂盒进行验证。结果显示:cELISA检测为阳性的20份血清中,用LPB-ELISA检出阳性19份;cELISA检测为阴性的20份血清中,用LPB-ELISA检出阴性17份;两种方法的κ值为0.8,总符合率为90.00%。结果表明,A型cELISA试剂盒与LPB-ELISA试剂盒的符合率和一致性均较高,可用于口蹄疫流行病学调查和血清学监测。     

Evaluation of solid-phase chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and latex agglutination tests for screening toxoplasma IgG in samples obtained from cats and pigs.

Serum samples from cats and pigs were analyzed by the solid-phase chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (SPCEI), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and indirect latex agglutination (ILA) methods. The SPCEI and ILA methods accurately analyzed Toxoplasma IgG (T-IgG) in both clinical and spiked samples from pigs and cats. The ELISA method accurately analyzed T-IgG in spiked samples from cats and pigs or clinical samples from pigs, but it did not accurately analyze T-IgG in clinical samples from cats. The antibody used in the ELISA kit did not cross-react with cat T-IgG. The SPCEI method that uses a stand-alone automated analyzer provided quantitative analysis, whereas the ELISA and ILA methods provided qualitative or, at best, semiquantitative analysis of T-IgG. The SPCEI and ELISA methods were rapid (60-90 minutes for 30 samples), whereas the ILA method required 13-15 hours for 30 samples. Although the three methods accurately distinguished positive from negative samples, the ILA method yielded many weakly positive results that were not confirmed by either the ELISA or SPCEI method. Thus, the indirect agglutination tests may give nonspecific responses at lower T-IgG concentrations.     

Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test for the detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) antibody in pigs from conventional farms

To evaluate the immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) antibody, conventional pigs in PRRSV-positive and -negative commercial farms were examined. Antibody development patterns in ELISA and IFA tests were compared in 3 week old piglets experimentally infected with the PRRSV. The virus was detected from 2 days post infection (PI) and then the antibody titers and S/P ratios rose by both methods. A total of 208 serum samples were collected from 4 PRRSV-negative farms and 210 samples from PRRSV-positive farms, and were tested for the PRRSV antibody by IFA and ELISA. The titer of 64 should be set as the cut-off point in IFA for field sera. Similarly, the cut-off S/P ratio should be set at 0.4 in ELISA. A high degree of correlation was observed between antibody titers by the two methods in these 418 samples, with a correlation coefficient of 0.84. The coincidence rate between the two tests was 84.7% (354/418). In non-coincident cases, ELISA was able to detect the antibody with a low titer in the serum samples which were negative in IFA but from PRRSV positive farms. ELISA was more sensitive than IFA to detect PRRSV infected animals or farms.     

应用ELISA(双抗体夹心法)检测猪流行性腹泻病猪粪便中的病毒抗原

应用猪流行性腹泻(PED)—ELISA直接法(双抗体夹心法)对120头健康猪和5头猪传染性胃肠炎(TGE)病猪粪便标本进行检测,均不出现交叉反应;对15头PED病毒实验感染仔猪粪便标本检测,全部呈阳性;将对3(?)份ELISA阳性粪便标本和3份阴性标本的检测结果与电镜观察结果比较,其阳性符合率为97.37％,阴性符合率为100％;对在PED发病季节从不同地区采集的腹泻病猪粪便标本112份检测结果,阳性率为60.71％,而阴性反应的标本,绝大多数是在病愈后15～20d采集的。