The use of remote sensing for estimating ET of irrigated wheat and cotton in Northwest Mexico

Components of a satellite-based system for estimating the crop water requirements of irrigated vegetation have been combined, applied, and tested against field data in the Yaqui Valley, northwest Mexico. Frequent satellite observations have the potential to provide snap shots of cloud variability at the high spatial and temporal resolutions that are needed for making simple, near real-time estimates of incoming solar radiation and, thus, daytime evaporation required for irrigation scheduling. Less frequent polar orbiting satellites offer the capacity of following the vegetation development at higher spatial resolution. The operational framework for obtaining cloud cover has been developed and applied using hourly sampled, 1 km resolution, GOES-10 data received in real-time. The high-resolution, cloud-screening algorithm has proved to be efficient and reliable and has been used to provide high-resolution (4 km) estimates of solar radiation. Relationships between vegetation indices (NDVI and SAVI) and crop coefficients (the ratio of measured to reference evapotranspiration) have been derived with four different models (Shuttleworth, Penman, Priestley–Taylor and Makkink), using ground-based surface reflectance measured over the crop. Continuous measurements of surface fluxes and other meteorological variables were made following almost the entire vegetative cycle of the plant using a station equipped with standard meteorological instruments and an eddy-correlation system. Actual evapotranspiration was computed as the product of the estimated crop coefficients, derived from field radiometer measurements, and reference evapotranspiration. In comparison with ground data, RMSE values are on the order of 1 mm per day. Finally the opportunity to use high-resolution satellite data to make near real-time estimates of crop evaporation is discussed.     

简化参照作物蒸散量（ETo）计算公式在青海省高寒区的适用性分析

【目的】以Penman-Monteith FAO-56公式为参照,分析Hargreaves、Priestley-Taylor和Makkink 3种简化的参照作物蒸散量(ETo)公式在青海高寒区的适用性。【方法】以青海省5个气候区(湿润、半湿润、半干旱、干旱和极端干旱)11个气象站1984-2011年的旬气象资料计算ETo,建立分析3种简化公式旬ETo与PenmanMonteith FAO-56公式的线性回归方程,并对比其年值的均方根误差率,分析3种简化公式的适用性。【结果】Hargreaves公式在大多数站点都低估了ETo,但在湿润和半湿润区的计算结果较好;Priestley-Taylor公式在多数站点都高估了ETo;Makkink公式在所有站点都低估了ETo,但其旬ETo值的误差最小,其与PMF-56公式的线性回归结果也最好。除极端干旱区外,Priestley-Taylor和Makkink公式计算的ETo与PMF-56公式的年均方根误差率均小于15%。【结论】Hargreaves公式只适用于青海省的湿润和半湿润区,Priestley-Taylor和Makkink公式可以直接用于青海省极端干旱区以外地区ETo的计算。     

基于称重式蒸渗仪实测日值评价16种参考作物蒸散量(ET_0)模型

参考作物蒸散量(ET_0)的准确估算是作物需水量及区域农业水分供需计算的关键,尽管已提出大量方法,但缺乏基于实测值的严格检验。本文利用北京小汤山2012年称重式蒸渗仪实测日值,检验16个ET_0模型,包括5个综合法、6个辐射法、5个温度法模型。依据均方根误差RMSE值,各模型估算效果的排序为FAO79 Penman=1963 Peman1996 Kimberly PenmanFAO24 PenmanFAO56 Penman-Monteith(PM)TurcFAO24 Blaney-Criddle(BC)DeBruin-KeijmanJensen-HaisePriestley-Taylor(PT)FAO24RadiationHargreavesMakkinkHamonMcloudBlaney-Criddle(BC)。总体而言,综合法表现最好,其RMSE在1.33~1.47mm·d~(-1),以FAO79 Penman和1963 Penman为最好;辐射法次之,其RMSE在1.48~1.77mm·d~(-1),以Turc最好;温度法检验效果最差,其RMSE在1.50~2.68mm·d~(-1),以FAO24 BC为最好。FAO79Penman和1963 Penman比最好的辐射法和温度法模型的精度分别高10%和13%。综合法、辐射法模型普适性好于温度法的原因在于其均含有影响ET_0的关键因子——辐射或饱和水汽压差VPD。所有模型均具有低蒸发条件下高估、高蒸发条件下低估的阈值特点,综合法及辐射法平均低估0.14mm·d~(-1)和0.33mm·d~(-1),而温度法平均高估0.52mm·d~(-1)。前两类方法 ET_0阈值相对较低,更适于低蒸发力条件,而温度法较适于高蒸发力条件。所有综合法、辐射法模型及温度法的Hargreaves和FAO24 BC法估算值与实测值变化趋势一致,说明模型结构合理,可通过参数校正提高精度;但对于与实测值趋势不吻合的温度法,模型结构尚需优化。VPD和最大湿度RHx是影响综合法、辐射法估算偏差的两大主要因子,其中VPD对低估类模型偏差影响最大,且偏差随着VPD增加而增大;而RHx对高估类综合法模型(1963 Penman、FAO79 Penman)偏差影响最大,且偏差随RHx增加而减小。校正后的PT(1.38)、Makkink(0.83)、Turc(0.014)及Hamon(1.248)系数大于原系数,而Hargreaves(0.0019)和BC(0.192)校正系数低于原系数。此外,PT与Hamon的系数利用最小相对湿度、Turc和Makkink系数利用VPD、Hargreaves和BC系数利用辐射或日照时数能得到最佳估算。FAO56 PM表现不佳(RMSE=1.47mm·d~(-1))的原因与站点气候干燥程度、较低的空气动力项权重有关。后人对原始Penman式的诸多修正并没有显著改善精度,因此建议在类似气候条件地区继续使用老版本Penman式。同时,对FAO56 PM的进一步检验将有助于回答"FAO56 PM是否真正比其它综合法具有优势,在何种气候下表现好,在高蒸发条件下低估是否为普遍现象"等科学问题。     

豫西北几种ET_0计算方法的比较及Hargeaves公式的修正

根据豫西北地区30年的气象资料,选用辐射法中的Makkink公式和Priestley-Taylor公式以及温度法的Hargreaves公式和McCloud公式计算了ET0,并以Penman-Monteith公式为标准,分别对各公式年值和旬均值的绝对误差、相对误差和累计误差进行分析,结果显示Hargreaves公式的精度最高。为了进一步提高Hargreaves公式的应用精度,建立了线形回归方程,并对其进行了修正。     

基于改进Makkink模型的四川盆地参考作物蒸散量估算

为了有效提高四川盆地参考作物蒸散量ET₀的预报精度,选取四川盆地16个代表性气象站点1961-2019年逐日气象数据,基于差分进化算法(DE)对辐射模型的经验参数校准改进Makkink模型并估算四川盆地ET₀,在日、月尺度上对改进的Makkink模型(M1-M6)和Jennsen-Haise(JH)及Irmak(IK)模型评价.结果表明:在日尺度上,改进的Makkink(M1-M6)模型(R²为0.77~0.87)模拟结果比JH和IK模型(R²为0.74~0.76)更精确,改进的Makkink模型中,M4模型估算精度最高,综合性指标GPI中位数为1.05;在月尺度上,改进的Makkink模型模拟结果(误差为3.59~15.71 mm/月)也优于JH和IK模型(误差为6.84~25.31 mm/月),其中M4模型估算精度最佳,综合性指标GPI为1.72.总体而言,推荐以温度和相对湿度作为输入数据的M4模型模拟四川盆地ET₀.