不同麻前给药配合乳化七氟烷对矮马肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统及无创血压影响的对比

本试验旨在比较不同麻前给药方案配合乳化七氟烷进行麻醉时对矮马无创血压及肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统（RAAS）的影响。以半野生矮马为研究对象，将10匹矮马随机分成KFXES组、KFDBES组两组，采用肌内注射的方式，KFXES组使用氯胺酮、静松灵、芬太尼对矮马进行诱导麻醉，KFDBES组使用氯胺酮、布托啡诺、右旋美托咪定和芬太尼对矮马进行诱导麻醉。矮马保持自主呼吸，采用静脉给药的方式，恒速静脉滴注6%乳化七氟烷维持麻醉2 h。在给药前记录常态下试验动物基础体征，在麻醉后持续2 h记录矮马的生命体征，分别于0、30、60、90、120 min监测无创血压，并同步采集血液样本，检测血浆中肾素、血管紧张素、醛固酮等因子的浓度。结果显示，在试验过程中，KFXES组矮马的血压与试验前对比有显著性差异（P<0.05），在0~60 min时，对RAAS的抑制性两试验组间无明显差异（P>0.05），麻醉时间超过90 min时，KFXES组对RAAS的抑制显著弱于KFDBES组（P<0.05）。因此，氯胺酮、芬太尼、布托啡诺及右旋美托咪定复合乳化七氟烷相对于氯胺酮、静松灵及芬太尼复合乳化七氟烷对半野生矮马进行麻醉时血压稳定性更好，在麻醉90 min后对RAAS的影响更大。本研究结果可为矮马的麻醉方法或剂量优化提供参考。     

Bispectral monitoring in dogs subjected to ovariohysterectomy and anesthetized with halothane, isoflurane or sevoflurane

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of halothane (H), isoflurane (I) or sevoflurane (S) on the bispectral index (BIS), and the effect of the addition of meperidine in dogs subjected to ovariohysterectomy.Study designProspective, randomized, blinded, clinical trial.AnimalsForty-eight female mixed-breed dogs, with weights varying from 10 to 25 kg.MethodsAll dogs were premedicated with acepromazine (A) (0.1 mg kg^?1 IM) or A and meperidine (M) (3 mg kg^?1 IM) and they were divided into six groups of eight animals (AH, AMH, AI, AMI, AS, and AMS). Fifteen minutes after premedication they were anesthetized with propofol (5 mg kg^?1 IV) and then orotracheally intubated. Anesthesia was maintained with halothane, isoflurane or sevoflurane, respectively. The BIS,

variables were recorded at 15 minutes after administering pre-anesthetic medication (T0); 10 minutes of anesthesia maintenance (T1); right ovarian pedicle ligation (T2); muscle suturing (T3); skin suture (T4) and 10 minutes after terminating the inhalant anesthetic (T5), respectively.ResultsBIS values were decreased at all times when compared to the baseline values in all groups (p < 0.05). In the comparative assessment between groups, the values obtained at T0 and T1 were similar for all groups. At T2, the values in AMH were lower than those obtained in AI, AMI and AS (p < 0.05). At the same time significantly higher values were found for AI when compared to AMS (p < 0.01). There was a correlation between the bispectral index and the expired anesthetic fraction in all groups.Conclusions and clinical relevanceWithin groups given the same inhalant anesthetic the bispectral index was a good indicator for the degree of hypnosis in dogs, indicating a good correlation with the amount of anesthetic and the nociceptive stimulation. BIS was a less reliable indicator of relative anesthetic depth when comparing equipotent end-tidal concentrations between the three inhalants.     

Effects of vatinoxan in dogs premedicated with medetomidine and butorphanol followed by sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomized clinical study

ObjectiveTo investigate effects of vatinoxan in dogs, when administered as intravenous (IV) premedication with medetomidine and butorphanol before anaesthesia for surgical castration.Study designA randomized, controlled, blinded, clinical trial.AnimalsA total of 28 client-owned dogs.MethodsDogs were premedicated with medetomidine (0.125 mg m^?2) and butorphanol (0.2 mg kg^?1) (group MB; n = 14), or medetomidine (0.25 mg m^?2), butorphanol (0.2 mg kg^?1) and vatinoxan (5 mg m^?2) (group MB-VATI; n = 14). Anaesthesia was induced 15 minutes later with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen (targeting 1.3%). Before surgical incision, lidocaine (2 mg kg^?1) was injected intratesticularly. At the end of the procedure, meloxicam (0.2 mg kg^?1) was administered IV. The level of sedation, the qualities of induction, intubation and recovery, and Glasgow Composite Pain Scale short form (GCPS-SF) were assessed. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (f_R), mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane (Fe′Sevo) and carbon dioxide (Pe′CO₂) were recorded. Blood samples were collected at 10 and 30 minutes after premedication for plasma medetomidine and butorphanol concentrations.ResultsAt the beginning of surgery, HR was 61 ± 16 and 93 ± 23 beats minute^?1 (p = 0.001), and MAP was 78 ± 7 and 56 ± 7 mmHg (p = 0.001) in MB and MB-VATI groups, respectively. No differences were detected in f_R, Pe′CO₂, Fe′Sevo, the level of sedation, the qualities of induction, intubation and recovery, or in GCPS-SF. Plasma medetomidine concentrations were higher in group MB-VATI than in MB at 10 minutes (p = 0.002) and 30 minutes (p = 0.0001). Plasma butorphanol concentrations were not different between groups.Conclusions and clinical relevanceIn group MB, HR was significantly lower than in group MB-VATI. Hypotension detected in group MB-VATI during sevoflurane anaesthesia was clinically the most significant difference between groups.     

Effect of sevoflurane concentration on visual evoked potentials with pattern stimulation in dogs

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of sevoflurane concentration on canine visual evoked potentials with pattern stimulation (P-VEPs). Six clinically normal laboratory-beagle dogs were used. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane was detected from all subjects by tail clamp method. The refractive power of the right eyes of all subjects was corrected to −2 diopters after skiascopy. For P-VEP recording, the recording and reference electrode were positioned at inion and nasion, respectively, and the earth electrode was positioned on the inner surface. To grasp the state of CNS suppression objectively, the bispectral index (BIS) value was used. The stimulus pattern size and distance for VEP recording were constant, 50.3 arc-min and 50 cm, respectively. P-VEPs and BIS values were recorded under sevoflurane in oxygen inhalational anesthesia at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 2.75 sevoflurane MAC. For analysis of P-VEP, the P100 implicit time and N75-P100 amplitude were estimated. P-VEPs were detected at 0.5 to 1.5 MAC in all dogs, and disappeared at 2.0 MAC in four dogs and at 2.5 and 2.75 MAC in one dog each. The BIS value decreased with increasing sevoflurane MAC, and burst suppression began to appear from 1.5 MAC. There was no significant change in P100 implicit time and N75-P100 amplitude with any concentration of sevoflurane. At concentrations around 1.5 MAC, which are used routinely to immobilize dogs, sevoflurane showed no effect on P-VEP.     

Effects of constant rate infusions of dexmedetomidine,remifentanil and their combination on minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in dogs

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of constant rate infusions (CRIs) of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil alone and their combination on minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in dogs.Study designRandomized crossover experimental study.AnimalsA total of six (three males, three females) healthy, adult neutered Beagle dogs weighing 12.6 ± 1.4 kg.MethodsAnesthesia was induced with sevoflurane in oxygen until endotracheal intubation was possible and anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane using positive-pressure ventilation. Each dog was anesthetized five times and was administered each of the following treatments: saline (1 mL kg^–1 hour^–1) or dexmedetomidine at 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 or 5.0 μg kg^–1 loading dose intravenously over 10 minutes followed by CRI at 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 or 5.0 μg kg^–1 hour^–1, respectively. Following 60 minutes of CRI, sevoflurane MAC was determined in duplicate using an electrical stimulus (50 V, 50 Hz, 10 ms). Then, CRI of successively increasing doses of remifentanil (0.15, 0.60 and 2.40 μg kg^–1 minute^–1) was added to each treatment. MAC was also determined after 30 minutes equilibration at each remifentanil dose. Isobolographic analysis determined interaction from the predicted doses required for a 50% MAC reduction (ED₅₀) with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine, with the exception of dexmedetomidine 5.0 μg kg^–1 hour^–1, obtained using log-linear regression analysis.ResultsThe sevoflurane MAC decreased dose-dependently with increasing infusion rates of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil. Remifentanil ED₅₀ values were lower when combined with dexmedetomidine than those obtained during saline–remifentanil. Synergistic interactions between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for MAC reduction occurred with dexmedetomidine at 0.5 and 1.0 μg kg^–1 hour^–1.Conclusions and clinical relevanceCombined CRIs of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil synergistically resulted in sevoflurane MAC reduction. The combination of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil effectively reduced the requirement of sevoflurane during anesthesia in dogs.     

Cardiopulmonary effects of butorphanol in sevoflurane‐anesthetized guineafowl (Numida meleagris)

ObjectiveTo evaluate the cardiopulmonary changes induced by intravenous butorphanol administration in guineafowl anesthetized with sevoflurane.Study designProspective experimental trial.AnimalsEight adult guineafowl (Numida meleagris) weighing 1.61 ± 0.49 kg were used for the study.MethodsBirds were anesthetized with sevoflurane and allowed to breathe spontaneously. After endotracheal intubation, end-tidal sevoflurane was adjusted to 1.0 individual sevoflurane MAC that was previously determined in triplicate using a standard bracketing technique. The brachial artery was catheterized for direct pressure measurement and blood sampling. Heart rate and rhythm were monitored by electrocardiography and respiratory rate was recorded. Baseline data were recorded 30 minutes after induction. Then, end-tidal sevoflurane was adjusted to 0.8 individual MAC and after 15 minutes physiologic variables were measured again. Subsequently, butorphanol (4 mg kg^?1) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds and physiologic responses were recorded at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 45 minutes after administration.ResultsButorphanol administration was associated with arrhythmias in all birds, including second-degree atrioventricular block, sinus arrest, ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular premature complexes. Heart rate and arterial blood pressures decreased significantly 1 minute after butorphanol administration. Two birds developed severe hypotension, apnea and ventricular fibrillation 5 minutes after administration, and one died.Conclusions and clinical relevanceThe butorphanol dose (4 mg kg^?1) that produces clinically relevant sevoflurane MAC reduction in guineafowl caused severe adverse cardiopulmonary effects in two birds and was considered unsafe under the conditions used in this study.     

Delivery of sevoflurane to dogs using a Stephens anaesthetic machine

ObjectiveTo investigate the sevoflurane concentrations produced within the Stephens anaesthetic machine circuit (vaporizer in-circle system) at different fresh gas flow rates (FGFRs), temperatures, vaporizer settings and vaporizer sleeve positions when used to anaesthetize dogs of different body sizes.Study designExperimental non-blinded studies.AnimalsEighteen mixed breed dogs, weights 4–39 kg.MethodsAnaesthetic induction with propofol was followed by maintenance with sevoflurane in oxygen via the Stephens anaesthetic machine. In study 1, the vaporizer setting, temperature and circuit FGFRs were altered with the vaporizer sleeve down (n = 3), or in separate experiments, up (n = 3). Delivered (Fi’SEVO) and expired sevoflurane concentrations were recorded. Study 2 determined the vaporizer settings (sleeve up) required to achieve predetermined multiples of minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of Fi’SEVO when sevoflurane was delivered to dogs (n = 12) of different bodyweights and at different FGFRs.ResultsDelivered concentrations of sevoflurane were sufficient to maintain anaesthesia in all dogs, regardless of bodyweight, FGFR, vaporizer temperature and sleeve position. Fi’SEVO increased with increasing temperature, when the vaporizer sleeve was down, when vaporizer setting was increased and when FGFR was decreased. As the FGFR increased or the dog’s bodyweight decreased, higher vaporizer settings were required to produce the same Fi’SEVO. The median Stephens vaporizer settings to achieve an Fi’SEVO of 1.3 MAC ranged from 4.3 to 5.0 for a small dog (1–10 kg), 2.5 to 5.6 for a medium dog (15–25 kg) and 2.5 to 3.5 for a large dog (30–40 kg), depending on the FGFR.Conclusion and clinical relevanceThe Stephens anaesthetic machine can deliver to dogs, weighing 4 kg and above, concentrations of sevoflurane sufficient or in excess of that required to maintain anaesthesia, at temperatures from 10 to 35 °C, FGFRs of 1 to 5 times the patient’s estimated metabolic oxygen requirement and at any vaporizer sleeve position.     

Minimum end‐tidal sevoflurane concentration necessary to prevent movement during a constant rate infusion of morphine,or morphine plus dexmedetomidine in ponies

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of a constant rate infusion (CRI) of dexmedetomidine and morphine to those of morphine alone on the minimum end-tidal sevoflurane concentration necessary to prevent movement (MAC_NM) in ponies.Study designProspective, randomized, crossover, ‘blinded’, experimental study.AnimalsFive healthy adult gelding ponies were anaesthetized twice with a 3-week washout period.MethodsAfter induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane in oxygen (via nasotracheal tube), the ponies were positioned on a surgical table (T0), and anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (Fe‘SEVO 2.5%) in 55% oxygen. Monitoring included pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and measurement of anaesthetic gases, arterial blood pressure and body temperature. The ponies were mechanically ventilated and randomly allocated to receive IV treatment M [morphine 0.15 mg kg^?1 (T10-T15) followed by a CRI (0.1 mg kg^?1 hour^?1)] or treatment DM [dexmedetomidine 3.5 μg kg^?1 plus morphine 0.15 mg kg^?1 (T10-T15) followed by a CRI of dexmedetomidine 1.75 μg kg^?1 hour^?1 and morphine 0.1 mg kg^?1 hour^?1]. At T60, a stepwise MAC_NM determination was initiated using constant current electrical stimuli at the skin of the lateral pastern region. Triplicate MAC_NM estimations were obtained and then averaged in each pony. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to detect differences in MAC between treatments (a = 0.05).ResultsSevoflurane-morphine MAC_NM values (median (range) and mean ± SD) were 2.56 (2.01–4.07) and 2.79 ± 0.73%. The addition of a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine significantly reduced sevoflurane MAC_NM values to 0.89 (0.62–1.05) and 0.89 ± 0.22% (mean MAC_NM reduction 67 ± 11%).Conclusion and clinical relevanceCo-administration of dexmedetomidine and morphine CRIs significantly reduced the MAC_NM of sevoflurane compared with a CRI of morphine alone at the reported doses.     

Endocrine, haematological and metabolic responses to sevoflurane anaesthesia in lambs

Objective To compare the magnitude and duration of the peri‐operative haematological, endocrine and metabolic effects of surgery performed under sevoflurane anaesthesia. Study Design Prospective randomized study. Animals Ten, 55‐day‐old lambs of both sexes, mean weight 20.8 ± 0.3 kg (range 18.5–23.6 kg). Methods Animals were randomly allocated to two equal groups. All were anaesthetized with sevoflurane for 3 hours. Surgery (end‐to‐end anastomosis of the right carotid artery and right jugular vein) was performed in animals of Group 1 only. The electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, cardiac output and noninvasive arterial blood pressure (NIBP) were monitored. Venous blood samples (5 mL) were taken 30 minutes before induction of anaesthesia (T = 0) and 1 (T1), 24 (T2), 48 hours (T3) and 7 days (T4) after anaesthesia in order to measure plasma cortisol, ACTH, insulin, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), glucose, protein concentrations and haematological variables. Results Sevoflurane decreased NIBP (minimum mean value: 64 ± 3 mm Hg) in both groups. Plasma cortisol and ACTH concentration increased in Group 1 (maximum mean values: cortisol: 136.2 nmol L^?1, ACTH: 54.5 pmol L^?1) and Group 2 (maximum mean values: cortisol: 128.7 nmol L^?1, ACTH: 44.0 pmol L^?1). Cyclic AMP increased only in Group 1 (9.3 nmol) 1 hour after anaesthesia. Neutrophilia, lymphopaenia and a decreased PCV were observed in both groups 1 hour after anaesthesia. Plasma protein and glucose concentrations did not change. Conclusions Increased ACTH and cortisol concentrations recorded 1 hour after anaesthesia suggest that sevoflurane induces a stress response in lambs. Clinical relevance The study did not identify the mechanism by which sevoflurane induces a stress response although hypotension is implicated.     

A comparison of the duration and quality of recovery from isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthesia in dogs undergoing magnetic resonance imaging

ObjectiveTo compare the recovery after anaesthesia with isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane in dogs undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain.Study designProspective, randomized clinical trial.AnimalsThirty‐eight dogs weighing 23.7 ± 12.6 kg.MethodsFollowing pre‐medication with meperidine, 3 mg kg^?1 administered intramuscularly, anaesthesia was induced intravenously with propofol (mean dose 4.26 ± 1.3 mg kg^?1), the trachea was intubated, and an inhalational anaesthetic agent was administered in oxygen. The dogs were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group I (n = 13) received isoflurane, group S (n = 12) received sevoflurane and group D (n = 13) received desflurane. Parameters recorded included cardiopulmonary data, body temperature, end‐tidal anaesthetic concentration, duration of anaesthesia, and recovery times and quality. Qualitative data were compared using chi‐squared and Fisher's exact tests and quantitative data with anova and Kruskal–Wallis test. Post‐hoc comparisons for quantitative data were undertaken with the Mann–Whitney U‐test.ResultsThe duration of anaesthesia [mean and standard deviation (SD)] in group I was: 105.3 (27.48) minutes, group S: 120.67 (19.4) minutes, and group D: 113.69 (26.68) minutes (p = 0.32). Times to extubation [group I: 8 minutes, (interquartile range 6–9.5), group S: 7 minutes (IQR 5–7), group D: 5 minutes (IQR 3.5–7), p = 0.017] and to sternal recumbency [group I: 11 minutes (IQR 9.5–13.5), group S: 9.5 minutes (IQR 7.25–11.75), group D: 7 minutes (range 3.5–11.5), p = 0.048] were significantly different, as were times to standing. One dog, following sevoflurane, had an unacceptable quality of recovery, but most other recoveries were calm, with no significant difference between groups.Conclusions and clinical relevanceAll three agents appeared suitable for use. Dogs’ tracheas were extubated and the dogs recovered to sternal recumbency most rapidly after desflurane. This may be advantageous for animals with some neurological diseases and for day case procedures.