快速型黄羽肉鸡饲料利用效率性状的基因组选择研究

旨在探究快速型黄羽肉鸡饲料利用效率性状的遗传参数,评估不同方法所得估计育种值的准确性。本研究以自主培育的快速型黄羽肉鸡E系1 923个个体（其中公鸡1 199只,母鸡724只）为研究素材,采用"京芯一号"鸡55K SNP芯片进行基因分型。分别利用传统最佳线性无偏预测（BLUP）、基因组最佳线性无偏预测（GBLUP）和一步法（SSGBLUP）3种方法,基于加性效应模型进行遗传参数估计,通过10倍交叉验证比较3种方法所得估计育种值的准确性。研究性状包括4个生长性状和4个饲料利用效率性状：42日龄体重（BW42D）、56日龄体重（BW56D）、日均增重（ADG）、日均采食量（ADFI）和饲料转化率（FCR）、剩余采食量（RFI）、剩余增长体重（RG）、剩余采食和增长体重（RIG）。结果显示,4个饲料利用效率性状均为低遗传力（0.08~0.20）,其他生长性状为中等偏低遗传力（0.11~0.35）;4个饲料利用效率性状间均为高度遗传相关,RFI、RIG与ADFI间为中度遗传相关,RFI与ADG间无显著相关性,RIG与ADG间为低度遗传相关。本研究在获得SSGBLUP方法的最佳基因型和系谱矩阵权重比基础上,比较8个性状的估计育种值准确性,SSGBLUP方法获得的准确性分别比传统BLUP和GBLUP方法提高3.85%~14.43%和5.21%~17.89%。综上,以RIG为选择指标能够在降低日均采食量的同时保持日均增重,比RFI更适合快速型黄羽肉鸡的选育目标;采用最佳权重比进行SSGBLUP分析,对目标性状估计育种值的预测性能最优,建议作为快速型黄羽肉鸡基因组选择方法。     

基于简化基因组测序技术和基因芯片技术比较研究黄羽肉鸡基因组选择

旨在比较简化基因组测序技术和基因芯片技术实施基因组选择的基因组估计育种值（GEBV）准确性。本研究在AH肉鸡资源群体F₂代中随机选取395个个体（其中公鸡212只,母鸡183只,来自8个半同胞家系）,同时采用10×SLAF测序技术和Illumina Chicken 60K SNP芯片进行基因标记分型。采用基因组最佳无偏估计法（GBLUP）和BayesCπ对6周体重、12周体重、日均增重、日均采食量、饲料转化率和剩余采食量等6个性状进行GEBV准确性比较研究,并采用5折交叉验证法验证。结果表明,采用同一基因标记分型平台,两种育种值估计方法所得GEBV准确性差异不显著（P>0.05）;不同的性状对基因标记分型平台的选择存在差异,对于6周体重,使用基因芯片可获得更高的GEBV准确性（P<0.05）,对于剩余采食量,则使用简化基因组测序可获得更高的GEBV准确性（P<0.05）。综合6个性状GEBV均值比较,两个基因标记分型平台之间差异不到0.01,高通量测序技术和基因芯片技术都可以用于黄羽肉鸡基因组选择。     

GBLUP技术在鸡品种选育中的应用效果研究

为揭示遗传力和标记密度对估计基因组育种值的影响和探讨基因组选择在家禽育种中的效果,运用QMSim软件分别模拟不同遗传力、不同标记数目的群体结构数据、基因组信息数据及相应的表型数据;运用基因组最佳线性无偏估计(GBLUP)方法估计基因组育种值,并计算基因组育种值的准确性;比较基因组选择与表型选择在育种成本以及遗传进展的差异。结果显示,随着遗传力和标记数目增加,估计育种值准确性明显提高,同时基因组选择在遗传进展上具有明显优势,但是在对表型选择与基因组选择进行成本分析时,基因组选择的成本并没有明显提高。因此,基因组选择育种在家禽育种过程中具有明显优势。     

猪血液免疫性状的复合基因组选择研究

该研究在提出“复合基因组选择（composite genomic selection）”概念的基础上,利用华中农业大学农业动物遗传育种与繁殖教育部重点实验室构建的免疫资源群体数据,通过交叉验证（cross-validation）策略,与标准GBLUP法对照,利用白细胞（WBC）、噬中性粒细胞（NE）等13项血液免疫性状对复合基因组选择的预测效果开展验证。研究结果表明,除血小板（PLT）等3个性状外,所有性状复合基因组选择的准确性均高于标准GBLUP法,分析结果支持复合基因组选择优于基于单一加性遗传组分的GBLUP的结论。同时,还探讨了不同交叉验证参数组合对复合基因组选择准确性的影响,发现最宜交叉验证倍数是性状特异性的,跟性状特性有关。总之,该研究提出了基于全部遗传组分的复合基因组选择法,并得到猪血液免疫性状数据分析结果的初步支持,特别是针对较小规模群体,复合基因组选择可能是提高基因组预测准确性的有效方法。     

畜禽基因组选择方法研究进展

畜禽的选种选育在生产中至关重要,育种值估计是选种选育的核心。基因组选择（genomic selection,GS）是利用全基因组范围内的高密度标记估计个体基因组育种值的一种新型分子育种方法,目前已在牛、猪、鸡等畜禽育种中得到应用并取得了良好的效果。该方法可实现畜禽育种早期选择,降低测定费用,缩短世代间隔,提高育种值估计准确性,加快遗传进展。基因组选择主要是通过参考群体中每个个体的表型性状信息和单核苷酸多态性（single nucleotide polymorphism,SNP）基因型估计出每个SNP的效应值,然后测定候选群体中每个个体的SNP基因型,计算候选个体的基因组育种值,根据基因组育种值的高低对候选群体进行合理的选择。随着基因分型技术快速发展和检测成本不断降低,以及基因组选择方法不断优化,基因组选择已成为畜禽选种选育的重要手段。作者对一些常用的基因组选择方法进行了综述,比较了不同方法之间的差异,分析了基因组选择存在的问题与挑战,并展望了其在畜禽育种中的应用前景。     

基于GBLUP和Bayes方法实现山羊体重基因组选择

为有效实现山羊基因组选择,提高选择准确性,根据前期对内蒙古绒山羊生产性能的遗传评估结果,以山羊的体重(h2=0.11)性状为例,结合NCBI已经公布的山羊基因组序列信息,设定群体传递过程和基因组参数,模拟获得个体表型和基因型数据,利用GBLUP和Bayes方法进行基因组育种值估计。结果表明,不同历史群体变化模式下,基因组选择对山羊体重基因组育种估计值准确性无显著影响(P>0.05)。GBLUP法估计的准确性高于Bayes Lasso,准确性达0.40。在历史群体下降模式下,基因组选择准确性高于恒定模式。     

基于GBLUP等模型对梅花鹿(Cervus Nippon)生长相关性状基因组选择的预测准确性比较

旨在基于GBLUP等模型对梅花鹿(Cervus Nippon)生长相关性状基因组选择的预测准确性进行比较。本研究以吉林某鹿场2014—2019年所产梅花鹿261只作为研究群体(公鹿96只，母鹿165只),对梅花鹿体重体尺等生长相关性状进行遗传力估计，并基于5-fold交叉验证方法对GBLUP、Bayes A、Bayes B、Bayes C、Bayes Lasso、RRBLUP六种基因组选择模型预测准确度进行了比较，以筛选出适合梅花鹿生长相关性状的基因组选择模型。结果发现：1)管围与臀端高的遗传力分别为0.43、0.50,属于高遗传力；体重、体高与体斜长的遗传力分别为0.22、0.30、0.27,属于中等遗传力；而胸围的遗传力为0.15,属于低遗传力；2)在GBLUP中，基因组选择预测的准确度与性状的遗传力呈正相关关系，而在Bayes类与RRBLUP法中并未表现明显正相关关系；3)在样本量较少的情况下，选取GBLUP作为基因组选择模型具有一定的优势；Bayes A可在低遗传力性状中作为首选；体重、体高、体斜长、管围、胸围、臀端高预测准确度最高的分别为GBLUP、Bayes B、Bayes...     

比较机器学习等算法对肉鸡产蛋性状育种值估计的准确性

我国白羽肉鸡育种中,通过遗传途径提高产蛋数和控制合适的蛋重是培育优良品系的一个重要方面。为探索适合我国白羽肉鸡育种中的基因组选择模型,本研究以2 474只白羽肉鸡品系的产蛋性状为研究对象,主要分析了机器学习算法KAML、BLUP(包括：PBLUP、GBLUP、SSGBLUP)和Bayes(包括：Bayes A、Bayes B和Bayes Cπ)方法对产蛋数和蛋重性状的预测准确性,准确性以5倍交叉验证进行评估。利用系谱以及基因组信息估计了产蛋数和蛋重性状的遗传力和遗传相关。结果表明,产蛋数性状遗传力为0.061~0.16,属于低遗传力性状;蛋重遗传力为0.28~0.39,属于中等遗传力性状;产蛋数与蛋重是中等遗传负相关(-0.518~-0.184),不同阶段产蛋数之间是强的遗传正相关(0.736~0.998)。不同模型预测43周产蛋数和52周蛋重的育种值估计准确性结果表明,KAML方法对两者的预测准确性分别为0.115和0.266,与GBLUP方法(准确性分别为0.118和0.283)和SSGBLUP方法(准确性分别为0.136和0.259)的准确性差异显著,同时显著低于Bayes方法(准确性分别为0.230~0.239、0.336~0.340)的预测准确性, PBLUP方法预测准确性最低(准确性分别为0.095和0.246)。因此,在白羽肉鸡产蛋数和蛋重性状中应用Bayes方法将获得最高的育种值估计准确性。     

河北省大白猪繁殖性状基因组选择参考群体构建和应用

联合育种是我国生猪遗传改良计划的重要工作，联合育种能够扩大群体规模，增加群体内遗传变异，提高育种值估计的准确性，且相较于传统育种方法对低遗传力的繁殖性状有着更明显的效果。本研究收集了河北大好河山养殖有限公司、河北裕丰京安养殖有限公司、石家庄清凉山养殖有限公司（以下分别简称大好河山、京安和清凉山）3家育种场共6 790条大白猪的繁殖性状，构建了基因组选择合并参考群体，通过基因型填充将纽勤50K(Geneseek)芯片基因型填充到液相50K，采用一步法进行基因组联合遗传评估。结果表明：清凉山与裕丰京安两场遗传背景相近，大好河山场与其他两场存在较远的联系；基于系谱信息预测大好河山个体的总产仔数育种值准确性为0.170，基因组预测准确性则为0.324；通过联合基因组遗传评估，总产仔数基因组预测的准确性进一步提升至0.347，比基于单场系谱信息提高了104%。本研究表明通过基因型填充统一各场SNP芯片类型，构建河北省大白猪繁殖性状基因组选择参考群，从而进行联合基因组选择是可行的，尤其对提高常规育种进展缓慢的繁殖性状意义重大。     

母系猪繁殖性状的基因组选择策略

与生长性状相比,猪的繁殖性状具有遗传力低和限性表现的特点,通过传统育种方法很难获得较高的育种值估计准确性,且无法缩短世代间隔。因此,猪的繁殖性状选育策略应与生长性状不同。基因组选择是一种基于全基因组信息的标记辅助选择。与生长性状相比,基因组选择对提高繁殖性状(如产仔数)的预测准确性更具有优势。然而,基因组选择的育种成本较高阻碍了该技术的广泛应用。本文旨在探讨母系猪繁殖性状基因组选择的参考群体构建策略,以节省基因组育种成本和加快遗传进展。     

Genomic prediction in a numerically small breed population using prioritized genetic markers from whole-genome sequence data

The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of genomic prediction of body weight and eating quality traits in a numerically small sheep population (Dorper sheep). Prediction was based on a large multi-breed/admixed reference population and using (a) 50k or 500k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes, (b) imputed whole-genome sequencing data (~31 million), (c) selected SNPs from whole genome sequence data and (d) 50k SNP genotypes plus selected SNPs from whole-genome sequence data. Furthermore, the impact of using a breed-adjusted genomic relationship matrix on accuracy of genomic breeding value was assessed. The selection of genetic variants was based on an association study performed on imputed whole-genome sequence data in an independent population, which was chosen either randomly from the base population or according to higher genetic proximity to the target population. Genomic prediction was based on genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), and the accuracy of genomic prediction was assessed according to the correlation between genomic breeding value and corrected phenotypes divided by the square root of trait heritability. The accuracy of genomic prediction was between 0.20 and 0.30 across different traits based on common 50k SNP genotypes, which improved on average by 0.06 (absolute value) on average based on using prioritized genetic markers from whole-genome sequence data. Using prioritized genetic markers from a genetically more related GWAS population resulted in slightly higher prediction accuracy (0.02 absolute value) compared to genetic markers derived from a random GWAS population. Using high-density SNP genotypes or imputed whole-genome sequence data in GBLUP showed almost no improvement in genomic prediction accuracy however, accounting for different marker allele frequencies in reference population according to a breed-adjusted GRM resulted to on average 0.024 (absolute value) increase in accuracy of genomic prediction.     

Comparison between Reduced-Representation Genome Sequencing and SNP Chip for Genomic Selection in Yellow-feathered Broiler

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) using reduced-representation genome sequencing technology and SNP chip technology to implement genomic selection. A total of 395 individuals (212♂+ 183♀, from 8 half-sib families) were randomly selected from F₂ generation of AH broiler resource population, and genotyped with 10×specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) and Illumina Chicken 60K SNP BeadChip. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and BayesCπ were used to compare the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for 6 traits: body weight at the 6^th week, body weight at the 12^th week, average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and residual feed intake (RFI). A 5-fold cross validation procedure was used to verify the accuracies of GEBV between prediction models and between genotyping platforms. The results showed that there was no significant difference between accuracies of GEBV predicted by GBLUP and BayesCπ using the same genotyping platform(P>0.05). The superiority of the two genotyping platforms was different for different traits. For body weight at the 6^th week, the accuracy of GEBV was higher using chip SNPs (P<0.05). On the contrary, the accuracy was higher using SLAF-seq for residual feed intake (P<0.05). Comprehensive comparison of the means of GEBV for 6 traits, the difference between the two genotyping platforms was less than 0.01, therefore, both high throughput sequencing and chip SNPs can be used for genomic selection in yellow-feathered broiler.     

Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for feed intake and other traits in growing beef cattle, and opportunities for selection

Growth, feed intake, and temperament indicator data, collected over 5 yr on a total of 1,141 to 1,183 mixed-breed steers, were used to estimate genetic and phenotypic parameters. All steers had a portion of Hereford, Angus, or both as well as varying percentages of Simmental, Charolais, Limousin, Gelbvieh, Red Angus, and MARC III composite. Because the steers were slaughtered on various dates each year and the animals thus varied in days on feed, BW and feed data were adjusted to a 140-d feeding period basis. Adjustment of measures of feed efficiency [G:F or residual feed intake (RFI), intake adjusted for metabolic body size, and BW gain] for body fatness recorded at slaughter had little effect on the results of analyses. Average daily gain was less heritable (0.26) than was midtest BW (MBW; 0.35). Measures of feed intake had greater estimates of heritability, with 140-d DMI at 0.40 and RFI at 0.52; the heritability estimate for G:F was 0.27. Flight speed (FS), as an indicator of temperament, had an estimated heritability of 0.34 and a repeatability of 0.63. As expected, a strong genetic (0.86) correlation was estimated between ADG and MBW; genetic correlations were less strong between DMI and ADG or MBW (0.56 and 0.71). Residual feed intake and DMI had a genetic correlation of 0.66. Indexes for phenotypic RFI and genotypically restricted RFI (no correlation with BW gain) were compared with simple economic indexes incorporating feed intake and growth to elucidate expected selection responses under different criteria. In general, few breed differences were detected across the various measurements. Heterosis contributed to greater DMI, RFI, and MBW, but it did not significantly affect ADG, G:F, or FS. Balancing output (growth) with input costs (feed) is needed in practicing selection, and FS would not be recommended as an indicator trait for selection to change feed efficiency. An index including BW gain and RFI produced the best economic outcome.     

Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium

The degree of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers differs depending on the location of the genome; this difference biases genetic evaluation by genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). To correct this bias, we used three GBLUP methods reflecting the degree of LD (GBLUP‐LD). In the three GBLUP‐LD methods, genomic relationship matrices were conducted from single nucleotide polymorphism markers weighted according to local LD levels. The predictive abilities of GBLUP‐LD were investigated by estimating variance components and assessing the accuracies of estimated breeding values using simulation data. When quantitative trait loci (QTL) were located at weak LD regions, the predictive abilities of the three GBLUP‐LD methods were superior to those of GBLUP and Bayesian lasso except when the number of QTL was small. In particular, the superiority of GBLUP‐LD increased with decreasing trait heritability. The rates of QTL at weak LD regions would increase when selection by GBLUP continues; this consequently decreases the predictive ability of GBLUP. Thus, the GBLUP‐LD could be applicable for populations selected by GBLUP for a long time. However, if QTL were located at strong LD regions, the accuracies of three GBLUP‐LD methods were lower than GBLUP and Bayesian lasso.     

Genome‐wide association study and genomic evaluation of feed efficiency traits in Japanese Black cattle using single‐step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method

The objectives of this study were to better understand the genetic architecture and the possibility of genomic evaluation for feed efficiency traits by (i) performing genome‐wide association studies (GWAS), and (ii) assessing the accuracy of genomic evaluation for feed efficiency traits, using single‐step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP)‐based methods. The analyses were performed in residual feed intake (RFI), residual body weight gain (RG), and residual intake and body weight gain (RIG) during three different fattening periods. The phenotypes from 4,578 Japanese Black steers, which were progenies of 362 progeny‐tested bulls and the genotypes from the bulls were used in this study. The results of GWAS showed that a total of 16, 8, and 12 gene ontology terms were related to RFI, RG, and RIG, respectively, and the candidate genes identified in RFI and RG were involved in olfactory transduction and the phosphatidylinositol signaling system, respectively. The realized reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values were low to moderate in the feed efficiency traits. In conclusion, ssGBLUP‐based method can lead to understand some biological functions related to feed efficiency traits, even with small population with genotypes, however, an alternative strategy will be needed to enhance the reliability of genomic evaluation.     

提高猪饲料效率的测定与选择

为提高猪饲料效率的选择,本试验测定一些与猪饲料效率相关的生产性状并进行遗传评估。方法：测定60头军牧1号白猪后备公猪的采食量、体增重、背膘厚等生产性状,用猪剩余采食量（RFI）和饲料转化率（FCR）作为评价饲料效率的两个指标,并对其遗传参数进行评估。结果：测定期内军牧1号公猪群体FCR均值为2．61,RFI的标准差为77．52。RFI与FCR的遗传力分别是0．35、0．33,RFI与ADFI（日采食量）、ADG（日增重）、BF（背膘厚）的遗传相关分别是0．89、0．12、-0．05,FCR与ADFI、ADG、BF的遗传相关分别是0．55、-0．65、-0．11。结论：军牧1号白猪品种内饲料效率存在较大的遗传差异,由于RFI与ADG遗传相关很低,因此用RFI作为选择性状可有效提高猪的饲料效率。     

Genetic correlations between males, females and castrates for residual feed intake, feed conversion ratio, growth rate and carcass composition traits in Large White growing pigs

Data were collected in the course of a divergent selection experiment for residual feed intake (RFI) of Large White growing pigs. This data set was used to estimate (i) heritability for RFI and genetic correlations of RFI with growth and carcass traits within the three sexes (male, castrate and female) and (ii) genetic correlations between sexes for these traits. Individual feed intake of animals raised in collective pens was measured by single-place electronic feeders on 1121 males (candidates for selection), 508 females and 535 castrates (sibs of candidates). Variance components were estimated using the REML methodology applied to a multitrait animal model. Estimates of heritability for RFI were 0.16 ± 0.04, 0.16 ± 0.08 and 0.23 ± 0.10 for males, females and castrates, respectively. Estimates of genetic correlations between sexes for homologous traits were not significantly different from 1 (0.88 to 0.99 for RFI, 0.79 to 0.99 for growth traits and 0.65 to 0.99 for carcass composition traits). The relatively low genetic correlations between castrates and males or females for backfat thickness (0.65 and 0.69, respectively) suggest the presence of genotype by sex interactions for this trait.