首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

甘蔗梢腐病田间抗性评价体系的建立
引用本文:王泽平,段维兴,李毅杰,梁强,周主贵,张木清,林善海.甘蔗梢腐病田间抗性评价体系的建立[J].华南农业大学学报,2016,37(3):67-72.
作者姓名:王泽平  段维兴  李毅杰  梁强  周主贵  张木清  林善海
作者单位:1. 广西大学农学院,广西南宁530005; 广西农业科学院甘蔗研究所/中国农业科学院甘蔗研究中心/农业部广西甘蔗生物技术与遗传改良重点实验室,广西南宁530007;2. 广西农业科学院甘蔗研究所/中国农业科学院甘蔗研究中心/农业部广西甘蔗生物技术与遗传改良重点实验室,广西南宁,530007;3. 广西农业科学院花卉研究所,广西南宁,530007;4. 广西大学农学院,广西南宁,530005
基金项目:现代农业产业体系建设专项(CARS-20-2-3);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903004-41);广西自然科学基金(2015GXNSFAA139051);广西农科院基本业务专项(2015JM03)
摘    要:【目的】探讨甘蔗梢腐病田间分级标准和品种(系)区域性抗病差异。【方法】以11个甘蔗新品种(系)和广西当前主栽品种ROC22在南宁、柳州、河池、百色、北海和崇左6个试验点梢腐病的发病情况为依据,建立甘蔗梢腐病田间病害分级标准及品种(系)抗性评价体系。【结果】参试点新植蔗梢腐病发病率为0.16%~23.82%(平均为3.51%),病情指数为0.03~16.48(平均为3.45),宿根蔗梢腐病发病率为0~25.89%(平均为4.27%),病情指数为0~17.37(平均为4.61)。建立了田间抗性评价标准,并将抗性水平划分为高抗、抗病、中抗、中感、感病和高感6个不同抗性等级。研究的12个品种(系)中没有发现高抗和高感材料,其中桂辐06-156、桂糖05-3846、桂选B9和ROC22抗性最好,表现为抗性;桂糖06-1023和桂糖06-400抗性最差,均表现为感病。根据病情指数对12个材料进行聚类分析,结果显示,不同甘蔗品种(系)的聚类与抗性等级划分的结果一致。梢腐病在广西蔗区的发生呈现区域性,崇左、柳州和河池3个试验点属于梢腐病重发区;北海次之;百色和南宁2个试验点属于轻发区。【结论】不同甘蔗种植区域、不同品种(系)以及不同植期存在感抗梢腐病差异性。

关 键 词:甘蔗  梢腐病  分级标准  抗性评价  聚类分析
收稿时间:2015/10/26 0:00:00

Establishment of an evaluation system for field resistance against sugarcane pokkah boeng
Institution:1 Agricultural College of Guangxi University,2 Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science/ Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement(Guangxi),Ministry of Agriculture,,2 Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science/ Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement(Guangxi),Ministry of Agriculture,,2 Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science/ Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement(Guangxi),Ministry of Agriculture,,2 Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science/ Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement(Guangxi),Ministry of Agriculture,,3 Flowers Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,,1 Agricultural College of Guangxi University, and 2 Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science/ Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement(Guangxi),Ministry of Agriculture,
Abstract:Objective] To discuss the field grading standard on sugarcane pokkah boeng disease severity , and study regional and varietal ( clonal ) differences in occurrence of pokkah boeng disease .Method]The occurrence of pokkah boeng disease on 11 new sugarcane varieties ( lines) and the dominant cultivar ROC22 in Guangxi was investigated in six sites including Nanning , Liuzhou, Hechi, Baise, Beihai and Chongzuo cities .The grading standard on sugarcane pokkah boeng disease and the resistance evaluation system were established .Result]The incidence and disease severity index ( DSI) of new-planting sugar-cane were 0.16%-23.82% ( average 3.51%) and 0.03 -16.48 ( average 3.45 ) respectively , and those of ratoon cane were 0-25.89%( average 4.27%) and 0-17.37 ( average 4.61 ) .According to the new standard , six resistance grades were established , including high resistance ( HR ) , resistance ( R) , medium resistance ( MR ) , medium susceptible ( MS ) , susceptible ( S ) and high susceptible (HS).HR and HS sugarcane varieties (clones) were not found in the 12 tested materials.Among the 12 varieties, Guifu06-156, Guitang05-3846, GuixuanB9 and ROC22 belonged to R grade and demonstra-ted the highest resistance against pokkah boeng disease , and Guitang06-1023 and Guitang06-400 were S grade with the lowest resistance .The 12 tested sugarcane varieties ( clones ) were clustered according to the DSI, and the result agreed with that of resistance grading .The incidence of pokkah boeng disease showed regional difference in Guangxi .The sugarcane areas of Chongzuo , Liuzhou and Hechi were the most serious , followed by Beihai , and Baise and Nanning were the least serious .Conclusion] There were distinct differences among different sugarcane areas , among varieties(lines)and among planting sea-sons regarding the susceptibility and resistance against pokkah boeng disease .
Keywords:sugarcane  pokkah boeng  grading standard  resistance evaluation  cluster analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《华南农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《华南农业大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号