首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

御道口牧场不同类型防护林的枯落物水文效应
引用本文:郝弯弯,赵鹏,李思维,谷建才.御道口牧场不同类型防护林的枯落物水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):197-204.
作者姓名:郝弯弯  赵鹏  李思维  谷建才
作者单位:河北农业大学林学院, 河北 保定 071000
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目"坝上高原及华北北部山地沙化土地治理与沙产业技术研发及示范"(2016YFC0500802);基于CFERN基础上的不同人工针叶林生物量和碳储量研究(LY201515)
摘    要:以承德市围场县御道口牧场4种不同类型(落叶松、樟子松、落叶松和樟子松混交林、樟子松和榆树混交林)防护林为研究对象,采用样地调查和室内浸泡法,对其枯落物的水文效应进行研究。结果表明:各种类型防护林的枯落物蓄积量的范围为5.42~24.59 t/hm~2,其中落叶松蓄积量最大,为24.59 t/hm~2,樟子松和榆树混交林蓄积量最小,为5.42 t/hm~2,且4种林分类型的半分解层蓄积量均大于未分解层;平均最大持水量规律为落叶松(16.61 t/hm~2)樟子松和落叶松混交林(14.80 t/hm~2)樟子松(10.22 t/hm~2)樟子松和榆树混交林(9.99 t/hm~2);平均最大持水率大小依次为落叶松(427.02%)樟子松和榆树混交林(396.30%)樟子松和落叶松混交林(360.88%)樟子松(303.13%);有效拦蓄量规律为樟子松和落叶松混交林(74.65 t/hm~2)落叶松(71.21 t/hm~2)樟子松(48.82 t/hm~2)樟子松和榆树混交林(17.66 t/hm~2);有效拦蓄率规律为落叶松(344.99%)樟子松和榆树混交林(326.66%)樟子松和落叶松混交林(286.27%)樟子松(215.49%)。综合结果表明落叶松的枯落物层持水能力最好,该地区落叶松防护林的枯落物层涵养水源功能优于其他类型的林分。

关 键 词:御道口牧场  不同林分  防护林  枯落物  水文效应
收稿时间:2019/5/31 0:00:00

Hydrologic Effects of Different Forest Types Shelterbelt Litter in Yudaokou Ranch
HAO Wanwan,ZHAO Peng,LI Siwei,GU Jiancai.Hydrologic Effects of Different Forest Types Shelterbelt Litter in Yudaokou Ranch[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,33(6):197-204.
Authors:HAO Wanwan  ZHAO Peng  LI Siwei  GU Jiancai
Institution:College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei 071000
Abstract:In this paper, four different forest stands (larch pine forest, camphor pine forest, mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine, and mixed forest of camphor pine and elm) of yudaokou pasture in weichang County, Chengde city were chosen as objects and their hydrologic effect of litter was studied by sample survey and indoor soaking method. The results showed that the amount of litter in various forest stands was 5.42~24.59 t/hm2, of which larch pine forest had the largest amount, 24.59 t/hm2, and the amount of mixed forests of camphor pine and elm was the smallest, 5.42 t/hm2. The contents of the semi-partition layer of the four stands of forest were all larger than the undecomposed layer. The average maximum water holding capacity was larch pine forest (16.61 t/hm2) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (14.80 t/hm2) > camphor pine forest (10.22 t/hm2) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (9.99 t/hm2). The average maximum water holding rate was larch pine forest (427.02%) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (396.30%) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (360.88%) > camphor pine forest (303.13%). The effective retaining content was mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (74.65 t/hm2) > larch pine forest (71.21 t/hm2) > camphor pine forest (48.82 t/hm2) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (17.66 t/hm2). The effective retaining rate was larch pine forest (344.99%) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (326.66%) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (286.27%) > camphor pine forest (215.49%). The comprehensive results showed that larch pine forest has the best water holding capacity in litter layer, and the function of retaining water in litter layer of larch shelter forest in this area is better than other types of forest stand.
Keywords:Yudaokou ranch  different forest stands  shelterbelt  litter  hydrological effects
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水土保持学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号