华北平原氮肥周年深施对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系土壤氨挥发的影响

氮肥深施能有效减少土壤氨挥发，然而目前国内外关于小麦-玉米轮作体系氮肥深施缺乏周年系统性研究。本试验于2018年10月—2019年10月在中国科学院栾城农业生态系统试验站小麦-玉米轮作农田进行，利用动态箱法研究不同深施模式氨挥发损失率、氨挥发特征，旨在探讨冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系下土壤氨排放对氮肥深施的响应，为减少农业源氨排放和优化农田施肥提供理论依据。试验设置5个处理：不施肥（CK）、常规肥料表施（T₁）、缓释肥表施（T₂）、缓释肥基追肥分层深施（T₃）、缓释肥一次性分层深施（T₄）。结果表明：氨挥发主要发生在玉米追肥季，占全年氨挥发量的84.84%；T₁、T₂、T₃和T₄处理的周年氨挥发累积量分别为22.75 kg·hm^-2、6.17 kg·hm^-2、2.25 kg·hm^-2和0.55 kg·hm^-2，分别占总施肥量的4.86%、1.32%、0.48%和0.13%。与常规肥料表施（T₁）相比，缓释肥处理（T₂、T₃和T₄）分别降低72.88%、90.11%和97.32%的氨挥发损失；一次性深施处理（T₄）能避开土壤氨高挥发期，周年氨挥发累积量与不施肥处理（0.43 kg·hm^-2）没有显著差异，且显著低于表施处理。CK、T₁、T₂、T₃和T₄全年产量分别为8.31 t·hm^-2、13.20 t·hm^-2、12.66 t·hm^-2、14.42 t·hm^-2和14.22 t·hm^-2；与常规肥料表施（T₁）相比，缓释肥深施（T₃和T₄）均可提高作物产量，分别增产9.25%和7.75%。而缓释肥表施（T₂）产量略有降低。综合考虑土壤氨排放和作物产量，缓释肥表施（T₂）可以显著降低土壤氨挥发，但是作物产量不稳定；而氮肥深施（T₃、T₄）能在保证作物高产的基础上显著降低土壤氨排放，是一种高效、简便、环境友好的施肥方式。     

Development of Superhydrophobic Microfibers for Bandage Coatings

In this research work, a fabricated composite fiber is proposed to protect wound surfaces from infectious organisms present in water. The composite fiber comprising PMMA, ZnO, and zinc stearate was developed using an electrospinning technique. The fiber surface was scientifically studied using scanning electron microscope, Energy dispersive analysis of X-rays, powder X-ray diffraction analysis and Fourier transform Infra-Red analysis. The pores present in between perpendicularly aligned fibers serves as an excellent medium for vapor transport to a wound surface. The maximum water contact angle of the developed fiber surface was approximately 151 degrees. A commercial cotton bandage after coated with this composite layer behaves as a perfect barrier to the entry of infectious water towards the wound. The pores in the fiber surface support rich supply of environmental oxygen and transport of exudate vapor from the wound. This fiber when coated over a cotton bandage cloth on one side served as an excellent wound protecting bandage against the penetration of external microbial water and also it admits the air, water vapor etc., towards the interior. Water penetration ability of hydrophilic cotton bandage and the water arresting ability of superhydrophobic fiber coated bandage were evaluated using a facile technique. Furthermore, antimicrobial activity of test samples was evaluated against gram positive and gram negative microorganism. Also, a bacterial infiltration test supports the blocking capability of superhydrophobic fiber to water-borne bacteria. The results obtained through this experiment may be used in future as wound healing bandages in an efficient manner.