Web2.0环境下学科馆员信息服务创新研究

在简述学科馆员概念、职责并分析Web2.0内涵的基础上,阐述了Web2.0对高校学科馆员的服务理念、服务深度和服务手段产生的深刻变化。     

比较PubMed，Scopus，Web of Science和Google Scholar的优点和缺点

PubMed,Scopus,web of Science和Google Scholar是当代生物医学科学信息最流行的资源工具。本文旨在比较这四种数据库在特定生物医学主题中检索信息、更新引文分析的区别。用数据库的官方网页在期刊涵盖的范围、用于搜索的实用程序及其限制、更新频率、引文特征等进行比较。用实例对关键词搜索来评估这些数据库检索结果的特点,并检索特定的一篇文章查看其引文特征。     

基于SCIE中动物遗传育种文献的分析

利用SCIE数据库,统计分析了1995―2008年间的动物遗传育种研究文献,并利用该数据库所带的分析工具(Results Analysis),对所获得的数据做进一步的挖掘。探讨了分子生物学文献研究的年代分布、语种、文献类型、期刊分布、作者、学科以及发文量前10名的国家和机构,以期了解世界各国在这一研究领域的进展情况。     

Web2.0对数字图书馆信息服务模式创新的启示

介绍了Web2.O的理念和典型特征,对数字图书馆现存信息服务模式的弊端进行分析,最后讨论了如何将Web2.0的服务理念融入到图书馆信息服务中来,使信息服务模式尽快地从"以图书馆为中心"向"以用户为中心"转变。     

基于Web3．0环境下图书馆虚拟参考咨询服务发展探析

介绍了Web3．0的概念、特点,提出了在Web3．0环境下图书馆虚拟参考咨询服务的发展方向。     

基于CiteSpace的草原碳汇研究的知识图谱分析

为全面深入了解草原碳汇相关研究在全球的现状和发展趋势,客观反映相关研究国家、机构、期刊、研究者的科研动向和影响力,采用Web of Science核心合集数据库中2010-2019年收录的有关草原碳汇研究的相关文献,基于CiteSpace软件进行可视化分析。结果表明:关于草原碳汇全球发文量,中国居榜首,美国和德国其次,国际合作方面,英国贡献最大,其他国家需加强合作和成果分享。发文量最多的机构为中国科学院,远超其他机构。《Global Change Biology》期刊在被引次数方面优势明显,在学术界有较大影响力。国外学者Butterbach-Bahl K发表相关文献数量最多,为领域作出较大贡献,其他作者之间合作强度还需加强。综合分析热点和前沿,提出了需加强对草原碳平衡的综合评估,丰富研究方法,扩大研究内容。     

浅谈网络环境下企业MIS开发中的软件工程思想

论述了软件工程思想在开发网络环境下企业MIS的几个主要阶段中的应用与改进。     

Information Literacy Across the Disciplines: Using the Science Information Literacy Wiki as a Collaborative Tool in Agriculture,Natural Resources,and Science Librarianship

The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Science and Technology Section (STS) wiki was launched in 2008. This article discusses the STS wiki development, content, publicity, and its application across the science disciplines. Information about assessment and future plans for the wiki is also provided. Some of the information included in this article was presented in a panel for the 2010 United States Agricultural Information Network (USAIN) Conference.     

Analysis of BioOne Journal Collections: Their Quality,Indexing Coverage,and Scholarly Content

This study examined the 130 current full-text titles in the BioOne.1 and BioOne.2 collections to determine whether they are peer-reviewed, contain book reviews, and are supplied by document delivery vendors. We identified indexing coverage in 11 major databases in agriculture and life sciences: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, Current Contents, Environmental Sciences and Pollution Abstracts, GeoRef, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Zoological Record. We concluded that the majority of the titles in BioOne collections are refereed and scholarly, indexed in several of the major indexing and abstracting journals in the field of agriculture and life sciences, and available via several major document delivery vendors. We find both BioOne collections to be valuable, useful, cost-effective journal aggregations.     

Global Bibliometric Analysis of the Research in Biochar

Global interest in studying biochar stems from its ability to sequester carbon in soil and render nutrients and moisture more readily available to root systems. Therefore, a bibliometric analysis was conducted to investigate global scientific publications related to biochar research, providing insight into the number of articles published, journal platforms, subjects, citations, and overall trends. The primary databases employed were the Web of Science and Science Citation Index. A total of 1,697 articles published between 2000 and 2015 were evaluated. This systematic bibliometric analysis will assist research groups and individuals to understand global biochar research trends and focus future research. The influence of biochar on soil, plants, and the environment continues to require greater attention.