Habitat variability in young-of-the-year winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, in Maine estuaries

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act defines essential fish habitat (EFH) as “the waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, and growth to maturity” and the protection of nursery areas has become a key element in US Federal fisheries management. Distribution and abundance by habitat for age-0, young-of-the-year (YOY) winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, were compared for 28 Maine estuaries to help define essential fish habitat for this life history stage. The Maine coast was divided into three broad geographic zones based upon geological features and sampled over 5 consecutive years; during April–November of 2000 in the Mid-coast, in 2001 and 2002 along the Southwest coast and in 2003 and 2004 along the Eastern Maine coast. One beam trawl (2.0 m width, 3 mm mesh) sample was collected in one to four habitats in estuaries: eelgrass (Zostera marina), kelp (Laminaria longicruris), drift algae (Phyllophora sp.) and unvegetated sand/mud. Fish were sampled every 2 weeks, April–November 2000–2004. Abundance of YOY winter flounder was greatest in Mid-coast estuaries between Casco and Penobscot Bays and was significantly lower in Southwest and Eastern estuaries. Abundance was similar across all four habitats in Mid-coast estuaries in 2000. In the other years, YOY were found in higher abundance in eelgrass relative to other habitats. A logistic regression model based on nearshore habitat characteristics was developed to predict the distribution of this species along the three broad geological zones of the Maine coast with the physical and biological variables most important in discriminating between habitats with and without individual fish identified. This logistic regression model correctly classified winter flounder 72.4% of the time based on the year, zone, the physical habitat variables (temperature, salinity, depth) and the presence–absence of submerged aquatic vegetation (eelgrass, kelp or algae). These results indicate that the type of habitat most important to YOY winter flounder varies among estuaries and EFH for this species and life stage must be defined with care.     

Landscape features determine brown trout population structure and recruitment dynamics

Variation in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) population recruitment and structure is related to migratory patterns, which should depend on ease of access to habitats providing increased opportunity for growth. We quantified the number of young of year (YOY) as a proportion of the total number of brown trout at 24 locations on 11 streams within the Taieri catchment, New Zealand, including back calculated growth rates and emergence dates from otoliths. Locations with high absolute and relative abundance of YOY fish were related to elevation and distance from the river mainstem (habitat used by migratory fish), fish density, and the interaction between invertebrate food biomass, distance and elevation. Hatch date and growth were not related to the proportion of YOY fish, though growth was negatively correlated to total fish density. We suggest landscape features play a large role in determining recruitment and population structure. Locations at lower elevations have a high YOY density, high competition and lower growth, likely prompting out‐migration. These conditions could be created by successful return migration and spawning of large fecund fish resulting in YOY densities exceeding the habitat carrying capacity. Environmental factors, such as food availability, also played a role in determining population structure. These results provide an example of how population structure and recruitment might be controlled by local conditions and access to high growth environments in wild populations of introduced brown trout across a catchment.     

Prey abundance, channel structure and the allometry of growth rate potential for juvenile trout

Abstract  The application of a drift-foraging bioenergetic model to evaluate the relative influence of prey abundance (invertebrate drift) and habitat (e.g. pool frequency) on habitat quality for young-of-the-year (YOY) and yearling juvenile cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarki (Richardson) is described. Experiments and modelling indicated simultaneous limitation of fish growth by prey abundance and habitat, where depth and current velocity limit the volume of water and prey flowing through a fish's reactive field as well as swimming costs and prey capture success. Predicted energy intake and growth increase along a depth gradient, with slower deeper pool habitat generating higher predicted growth for both YOY and yearling trout. Bioenergetic modelling indicated that fish are constrained to use progressively deeper habitats to meet increasing energy requirements as they grow. Sensitivity of growth to prey abundance identified the need to better understand how variation in invertebrate drift and terrestrial drop affects habitat quality and capacity for drift-feeding fishes.     

Fish feeding in changing habitats: effects of invasive macrophyte control and habitat complexity

Abstract –  Many freshwater lakes have been invaded by non-native aquatic plants. Although managing the invasions is necessary to restore native macrophytes, little is known about the effects of invasive macrophyte eradication on fish foraging. This study was designed to determine whether fish feeding was affected by large-scale changes in plant composition after selective control of invasive Eurasian watermilfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum , and whether feeding was correlated with habitat complexity or abundance of invasive plants on a smaller scale. Popnets were used to collect plants, invertebrates and fishes in the littoral zone of four Minnesota lakes twice a year for 4 years. The degree of stomach fullness in fishes was not correlated with the proportion of invasive plants or habitat complexity. Bluegills, the most abundant fish species, exhibited high selectivity for Diptera and their preferences varied little in different plant habitats. Changes in niche width of bluegills were not consistent with invasive plant control. Overall, invasive macrophyte control with timely restoration of the native plant community did not affect the characteristics of fish feeding we investigated. This study also contributes to our understanding of fish–macroinvertebrate interactions as a function of habitat complexity.     

Environmental requirements and heterogeneity of rheophilic fish nursery habitats in European lowland rivers: Current insights and future challenges

The large-scale degradation of riparian ecotones and of the connectivity between rivers and their floodplains has resulted in a drastic decline of rheophilic fish populations in European temperate lowland rivers. Recent river restoration projects have had variable success in effectively restoring these fish populations. Knowledge on nursery habitat requirements is considered essential for effective population restoration. However, a detailed understanding of the role of habitat heterogeneity in young-of-the-year (YOY) fish population development is limited. Therefore, we carried out a synthesis of the available knowledge on nursery habitat requirements of rheophilic fish species found in European temperate lowland rivers (<200 m elevation). From a total of 603 papers, 77 studies with primary information were selected, containing 390 associations between habitat features and YOY fish. As expected, most studies focused on static components of physical riparian habitat. Generally, YOY fish require habitats of shallow depth (<0.5 m), with slow-flowing water (<0.2 m/s), gentle bank slope (<20°), variety in substratum types (fine sand to gravel), relatively warm water and high food availability. Surprisingly, no clear ontogenetic habitat shifts between larvae and juveniles were found, which may be explained by the limited spatial–temporal resolution of most studies. Since 2011, studies on habitat heterogeneity have increased, but few have explicitly assessed its role in relation to movement patterns of YOY fish for nursery success. Therefore, we recommend that future research focuses on fish movement patterns between habitat patches in heterogeneous (river-floodplain) environments, to increase the knowledge base for effective recovery of rheophilic fish populations.     

Influence of aquatic plant‐specific habitat on an assemblage of small neotropical floodplain fishes

Dibble ED, Pelicice FM. Influence of aquatic plant‐specific habitat on an assemblage of small neotropical floodplain fishes.
Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2010: 19: 381–389. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S Abstract – This study investigated the effects of plant‐specific habitat on the distribution of young and small adult fishes in lagoons of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. We compared fish catch per unit effort (CPUE) and species richness and used an indirect gradient analysis to investigate fish‐plant relationships within three aquatic macrophytes beds (Cabomba furcata, Eichhornia azurea, Nymphaea amazonum), and explored microhabitat influence (indexed by eight variables related to physical structure and water quality) on the structure of fish assemblages. Rarefaction analysis was used to compare fish species richness among the vegetated habitats. We captured a total of 1599 fish constituting 23 species, 7 families and 3 orders. Fish CPUE and species richness increased relative to microhabitat structure innate to the macrophytes; higher CPUE and richness were observed in C. furcata beds, a submerged aquatic macrophyte with finely dissected leaves. On the contrary, N. amazonum, a species that provides low microhabitat complexity, harbored fewer individual fish and number of species. Reproduction dynamics, hydrology and the amount of available plant‐generated habitat structure (surface effect) contributed to the disproportionally high number of individuals captured during the dry season. Our data suggest that the microhabitat physical structure (e.g., edge distance, stem density and patch size) provided by macrophyte beds in the lagoons of the Upper Paraná River may play a more important role than physicochemistry (e.g., oxygen, temperature and pH) at mediating distribution patterns of small‐sized fishes.     

Distribution and feeding of juvenile fish on invertebrates in littoral reed (Phragmites) stands

Abstract – Complex interactions between fish predators and their prey have been found in structurally complex habitats built by submerged macrophytes. In contrast, the role of comparably structured littoral reed stands in shaping biotic interactions has not been investigated. We hypothesised that reed stands may be a valuable feeding habitat for juvenile fish, and that perch and roach may segregate along the spatial and dietary niche dimensions between reed and open water habitats. In contrast, the protection effect of reed against predators was assumed to be rather low because of the lower plant volume infested in reed when compared with submerged macrophytes. We analysed biomass and growth of juvenile (age 0 and age 1) perch and roach in littoral reed habitats and in open water habitats in front of the reed in the shallow Lake Müggelsee over 4 months in 2000. Sampling was conducted by point-abundance electrofishing over the full diel cycle (day, dusk, night, dawn). Zooplankton and benthos biomasses were determined in both habitats as well, and habitat-specific diet of fish was assessed during day and night. Roach were more frequent than perch in both habitats. Food of roach included a higher proportion of zooplankton, whereas perch fed more on macroinvertebrates. Overall, diet overlap between the fish groups was high. Diel distribution of fish did not follow the expectations of habitat segregation between perch and roach. Instead, the function of reed as refuge habitat against littoral piscivores (mainly birds) may have caused the strong daytime preference for reed in almost all fish groups, which was partly upset by roach at night. The higher behavioural plasticity of roach may explain their good performance even under the conditions of high structural complexity.     

Fish community composition of a tropical nonestuarine embayment in Zanzibar,Tanzania

ABSTRACT:   By using a seine net, fish samples were taken from the nonestuarine Chwaka Bay (Zanzibar, Tanzania) from the mangroves, mud/sand flats and seagrass beds. Sampling was done twice per month between November 2001 and October 2002. In total, 150 fish species belonging to 55 families were identified. Diversity ( H' ) ranged from 1.9 in mud/sand flats to 3.4 within the Chwaka seagrass beds. Mean density of fishes was significantly higher in the mangrove creeks than in any other habitat (mean = 238.7 ind./1000 m²). Highest, but non-significantly different mean biomasses were recorded in the mangrove creeks (1.7 kg/1000 m²) and in the Marumbi seagrass beds (1.6 kg/1000 m²). The mangrove channel had the lowest biomass (0.6 kg/1000 m²). A high overlap in species composition (as high as 93.4% similarity) was found for adjoining habitats (i.e. mangrove creeks and mangrove channel), while habitats that were far apart showed low overlap (6.6% similarity for the Marumbi seagrass beds and mangrove creeks). On average, 58.4 and 63.2% in terms of abundance and biomass, respectively, of the fish assemblage of Chwaka Bay were of commercial fishery importance. Thus, Chwaka Bay appears to be an important juvenile habitat for various commercially important fish species.     

Summer microhabitat use by adult and young‐of‐year snail darters (Percina tanasi) in two rivers

Ashton MJ, Layzer JB. Summer microhabitat use by adult and young‐of‐year snail darters (Percina tanasi) in two rivers. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2010: 19: 609–617. © Published 2010. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Abstract – We characterised microhabitat availability and use by adult and young‐of‐year (YOY) snail darters (Percina tanasi Etnier 1976 ) while snorkelling in the French Broad and Hiwassee rivers, TN, USA. Both age groups of snail darters disproportionately used most microhabitat variables compared to their availability. Snail darters primarily occupied moderately deep, swift water over gravel substrates with little macrophyte coverage and no silt. Univariate comparisons indicated that adult and YOY darters occupied different habitat, but there was no marked differences between principal components analysis plots of multivariate microhabitat use within a river. Although the availability of microhabitat variables differed between the French Broad and Hiwassee rivers, univariate means and multivariate plots illustrated that the habitats used were generally similar by age groups of snail darters between rivers. Because our observations of habitat availability and use were constrained to low flow periods and depths <1 m, the transferability of our results to higher flow periods may be limited. However, the similarity in habitat use between rivers suggests that our results can be applied to low‐normal flow conditions in other streams.     

Evaluation of the removal of impassable barriers on anadromous salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River Basin

Despite the popularity of barrier removal as a habitat restoration technique, there are few studies that evaluate the biological effects of restored stream crossings. An extensive post‐treatment study design was used to quantify fish populations (e.g. species, life stage, abundance) and habitat attributes (e.g. gradient, geomorphic channel units) at 32 culvert removal or replacement projects to determine their effectiveness in restoring habitat access for juvenile salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and steelhead, O. mykiss (Walbaum), in the Columbia River Basin, USA. Anadromous fish (steelhead, Chinook salmon O. tshawytscha [Walbaum]) abundance, juvenile steelhead abundance and habitat conditions were not significantly different between paired reaches (i.e. upstream and downstream of former barrier sites), suggesting these sites are no longer full barriers to movement. This suggests that barrier removal projects on small Columbia Basin streams provide adequate fish passage, increased habitat availability and increased juvenile anadromous fish abundance immediately upstream of former barriers.