Iron fertilizers applied to calcareous soil on the growth of peanut in a pot experiment

A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L., Fabceae) to evaluate iron compound fertilizers for improving within-plant iron content and correcting chlorosis caused by iron deficiency. Peanuts were planted in containers with calcareous soil fertilized with three different granular iron nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) fertilizers (ferrous sulphate (FeSO₄)–NPK, Fe–ethylendiamine di (o-hydroxyphenylacetic) (EDDHA)–NPK and Fe–citrate–NPK). Iron nutrition, plant biomass, seed yield and quality of peanuts were significantly affected by the application of Fe–citrate–NPK and Fe–EDDHA–NPK to the soil. Iron concentrations in tissues were significantly greater for plants grown with Fe–citrate–NPK and Fe–EDDHA–NPK. The active iron concentration in the youngest leaves of peanuts was linearly related to the leaf chlorophyll (via soil and plant analyzer development measurements) recorded 50 and 80 days after planting. However, no significant differences between Fe–citrate–NPK and Fe–EDDHA–NPK were observed. Despite the large amount of total iron bound and dry matter, FeSO₄–NPK was less effective than Fe–citrate–NPK and Fe–EDDHA–NPK to improve iron uptake. The results showed that application of Fe–citrate–NPK was as effective as application of Fe–EDDHA–NPK in remediating leaf iron chlorosis in peanut pot-grown in calcareous soil. The study suggested that Fe–citrate–NPK should be considered as a potential tool for correcting peanut iron deficiency in calcareous soil.     

Effects of phosphate carriers,iron, and indoleacetic acid on iron nutrition and productivity of peanut on a calcareous soil

Results of a field experiment designed to assess the effects of phosphate carriers, iron (Fe), and indoleacetic acid (IAA) on the Fe nutrition of peanut grown on a calcareous soil showed that single superphosphate (SSP) was more effective than diammonium phosphate (DAP) in improving Fe nutrition and chlorophyll synthesis. Increased phosphorus (P) and Fe contents of chlorotic leaves showing symptoms of Fe deficiency suggested that Fe, despite absorption and uptake, was subjected to inactivation, and that the Fe content per se was not the cause of the observed chlorosis. Better amelioration of chlorosis with the SSP treatment as compared with DAP indicated a role of sulphur (S) in preventing inactivation of Fe, possibly caused by excessive P accumulation. A foliar spray of Fe‐EDDHA corrected the chlorosis, but a ferric citrate foliar treatment did not. This further suggested that the mobility of Fe was impaired in chlorotic plants. An IAA foliar spray only also tended to improve Fe nutrition. Significant increase in peanut productivity was observed following improvement in Fe nutrition both with soil and foliar treatments.     

Interaction of Different Iron Chelates with an Alkaline and Calcareous Soil: A Complementary Methodology to Evaluate the Performance of Iron Compounds in the Correction of Iron Chlorosis

Abstract

A great number of studies have shown that the stability of iron chelates as a function of pH is not the unique parameter that must be considered in order to evaluate the potential effectiveness of Fe‐chelates to correct iron chlorosis in plants cultivated in alkaline and calcareous soils. In fact, other factors, such as soil sorption on soil components or the competition among Fe and other metallic cations for the chelating agent in soil solution, have a considerable influence on the capacity of iron chelates to maintain iron in soil solution available to plants. In this context, the aim of this work is to study the variation in concentration of the main iron chelates employed by farmers under field conditions—Fe‐EDDHA (HA), Fe‐EDDHMA (MA), Fe‐EDDHSA (SA), Fe‐EDDCHA (CA), Fe‐EDTA (EDTA), and Fe‐DTPA (DTPA)—in the soil solution of a calcareous soil over time. To this end, soil incubations were carried out using a soil:Fe solution ratio corresponding to soil field capacity, at a temperature of 23°C. The soil used in the experiments was a calcareous soil with a very low organic matter content. The variation in concentration of Fe and Fe‐chelates in soil solution over time were obtained by measuring the evolution in soil solution of both the concentration of total Fe (measured by AAS), and the concentration of the ortho‐ortho isomers for Fe‐EDDHA and analogs or chelated Fe for Fe‐EDTA and Fe‐DTPA (measured by HPLC). The following chelate samples were used: a HA standard prepared in the laboratory and samples of HA, MA, SA, CA, Fe‐EDTA, and Fe‐DTPA obtained from commercial formulations present in the market. The percentage of iron chelated as ortho‐ortho isomers for HAs was: HA standard (100%); HA (51.78%); MA (60.06%); SA (22.50%); and CA (27.28%). In the case of Fe‐EDTA and Fe‐DTPA the percentages of chelated iron were 96.09 and 99.12, respectively. Results show that it is possible to classify the potential effectiveness of the different types of iron chelates used in our experiments as a function of two practical approaches: (i) considering the variation of total iron in soil solution over time, MA is the best performing product, followed by HA, CA, SA, DTPA, EDTA, and ferrous sulfate in the order listed and (ii) considering the capacity of the different iron chelates to maintain the fraction of chelated iron (ortho‐ortho isomers for HA, MA, SA, and CA and total chelated iron for EDTA and DTPA) in soil solution, the order is: SA > CA > HA > MA > EDTA ≈ DTPA. This result, that is related to the nature of the chelate and does not depend on the degree of chelated Fe in the products, indicates that SA and CA might be very efficient products to correct iron chlorosis. Finally, our results also indicate the suitability of this soil incubation methodology to evaluate the potential efficiency of iron compounds to correct iron chlorosis.     

Fe Chelates for Remediation of Fe Chlorosis in Strategy I Plants

Abstract

Iron chlorosis is a mineral disorder due to low Fe in the soil solution and the impaired plant uptake mechanism. These effects increased with high pH and bicarbonate buffer. The solution to Fe chlorosis should be made by either improving the Fe uptake mechanism or increasing the amount of Fe in the soil solution. Among Fe fertilizers, only the most stable chelates (EDDHA and analogous) are able to maintain Fe in the soil solution and transport it to the plant root. In commercial products with the same chelating agent, the efficacy depends on the purity and the presence of subproducts with complexing activity, that can be determined by appropriate analytical methods such as HPLC. In commercial products declaring 6% as Fe‐EDDHA, purity varied from 0.5% to 3.5% before 1999, but in 2002 products ranging 3–5.4% chelated Fe are common in the Spanish market. Fe‐o,p‐EDDHA, as a synthesis by‐product with unknown efficacy, is present in all Fe‐EDDHA formulations. Commercial Fe‐EDDHMA products also contain methyl positional isomers. Fe‐EDDHSA synthesis produces condensation products with similar chelating capacity to the Fe‐EDDHSA monomer that can account for more than 50% of the chelated iron in the commercial products. Chelates with different molecules should be compared for their efficacy considering firstly their ability to maintain Fe in solution and secondly their capacity to release iron to the roots. Accepting the turnover hypothesis, their efficacy is also dependent thirdly on the ability of the chelating agent to form the chelate using native iron from the soil. The 1st and 3rd points are related to the chemical stability of the chelate, while plants make better use of iron from the less stable chelates. Plant response is the ultimate evaluation method to compare commercial products with the same chelating agent or different chelates.     

Interaction of iron chelates with several soil materials and with a soil standard

Frequently the effectiveness of iron (Fe) chelates is low because they can be retained or destroyed by soil materials. The high cost of these Fe fertilizers makes it necessary to study soil material reaction with Fe chelates. Commercial Fe chelates with EDTA, EDDHA, and EDDHMA as ligands and their standards, prepared in the laboratory, were shaken for one hour with various soil materials [amorphous Fe(III) oxide, acid peat, calcium (Ca)‐montmorillonite and calcium carbonate (CaCO₃)] and with a soil standard made in the laboratory. After agitation, the chelate‐soil mixtures were filtered and the micronutrients and chelated Fe that remained in solution were determined. Among the soil materials used, amorphous Fe(III) oxide and acid peat had the greatest affect on the amount of chelated Fe remaining in solution. The type of chelating agent was the next major factor that affected the availability of soluble Fe following reaction with the soil materials. Another factor was the commercial formulation of the Fe chelates. The chelates comprised of EDDHA or EDDHMA maintained the highest percentages of chelated Fe in solution after interaction with the solid phases, except for the acid peat. The last soil material, acid peat, retained more chelated Fe for the Fe chelates with EDDHA or EDDHMA than with EDTA as the chelating agent. The commercial Fe‐EDDHA chelates had greater losses of chelated Fe than their standard after interaction with all the solid phases. The commercial Fe‐EDDHA chelate (Sequestrene) and the commercial Fe‐EDDHMA chelate (Hampirón) solubilized the highest amount of copper (Cu) from soil standard. This was attributed to the presence of by‐products in the commercial formulations since the Fe‐EDDHA standard did not have Cu in solution after the interaction. Therefore, the commercial Fe chelate by‐products are able to form Cu‐complexes which could affect chelated Fe and its availability to plants.     

Efficacy of commercial Fe(III)‐EDDHA and Fe(III)‐EDDHMA chelates to supply iron to sunflower and corn seedlings

Use of synthetic iron (Fe) chelates is the most common and effective way to treat Fe chlorosis in plants. Most commercial products contain Fe‐EDDHA or Fe‐EDDHMA but their efficacy can be quite different. Commercial products with EDDHA or EDDHMA as active components were chosen based on the data obtained by Lucena et al. (1992) in their chemical test. The chelates present extreme differences in behavior in the mentioned chemical tests. The analysis of the products revealed that the total Fe concentration is greater than the one indicated by the manufacturer in spite of a lesser amount of FeY^‐ present. The plant response to these commercial products was tested using short‐term greenhouse hydroponic cultures. Sunflower and corn were chosen because of their different behavior under Fe‐stress conditions. No significant difference between plants treated with Fe‐EDDHA or Fe‐EDDHMA chelates were observed. Since the purity index indicates there are too many differences between commercial formulations of the same type of chelate, the differentiation between groups cannot be determined with commercial products. Index I3, described by Lucena et al. (1992), does not correlate with the plant response because it did not consider the purity percentage of the products.     

The use of iron chelates in compound fertilizers containing trace elements

Abstract

The chemical behaviour of iron chelates, incorporated in compound fertilizers with inorganic micronutrient compounds, was studied. Pot experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of these products in controlling iron deficiency. A commercial compound fertilizer, containing 0.09% Fe as Fe‐DTPA, 0.12% Cu, 0.16% Mn and 0.04% Zn as sulfates, proved to be ineffective in preventing iron chlorosis in Chamaecyparis lawsoniana ’Alumii’, growing on sphagnum peat at two lime levels. The same fertilizer formulation with 0.09%‐ Fe as Fe‐EDDHA did prevent iron chlorosis at both lime levels. Fe‐EDTA, incorporated in the compound fertilizer, gave good results at the lower but not at the higher lime level, due to the low stability of Fe‐EDTA at high pH. Data from laboratory experiments showed that copper replaced the chelated iron in the compound fertilizer containing Fe‐DTPA, causing the iron to precipitate. The strong competition between copper and iron for the organic ligand is due to a specific affinity of copper for DTPA, resulting in a copper chelate with high stability constant and a molar ratio of copper to chelating agent of 2 : 1.

In the case of Fe‐EDDHA and Fe‐EDTA the competition between iron and copper is much weaker. In contrast to Fe‐DTPA, these chelates remain rather stable when incorporated in fertilizers containing micronutrients.     

Iron treatment of lime‐induced chlorosis: Implications for chlorophyll,Fe2 +, Fe3 + and K+ in leaves 1

This study addressed some complementary aspects related to plant Fe nutrition. A field and a greenhouse experiment were conducted to monitor changes in chlorophyll, Fe³⁺, Fe²⁺, Ca²⁺ and K⁺ along with the progressive evolution of lime‐induced chlorosis, and following soil (Fe‐EDDHA, Fe‐EDTA, Fe‐DTPA, DTPA) and foliar (Fe‐EDDHA, FeSO₄, “Fe‐Metalosate") treatments, in a chlorosis‐susceptible ornamental plant, Hydrangea macrophylla, over a year's growing period. Though soil Fe‐EDDHA was the most effective compound in alleviating chlorosis symptoms, it became less so with time and was only partly effective as a foliar spray. Leaf analysis showed that as chlorosis intensified and chlorophyll content decreased, phenanthroline ‐ Fe (Fe²⁺) decreased with corresponding increases in total iron (Fe³⁺) and K⁺ concentrations. The reliability of these chlorosis‐indicators was confirmed as the reverse changes occurred upon chlorosis plant recovery.     

Methodology to Screen New Iron Chelates: Prediction of Their Behavior in Nutrient Solution and Soil Conditions

Abstract

Iron chelates analogous to ethylenediamino‐di(o‐hydroxyphenyl)acetic acid (EDDHA) are the fertilizers chosen to treat iron chlorosis of crops grown on calcareous soils. Characterization of these synthetic ligands should be made to establish their chemical behavior and efficiency as chlorosis correctors. The aim of this research was to develop an appropriate methodology to screen new iron chelates using analytical determinations and chemical equilibrium concepts. Fe‐EDDHA, Fe‐EDDH4MA, Fe‐EDDH5MA, and Fe‐PDDHA chelates, were compared to check the proposed methodology. Titrimetric purity, protonation and Ca, Mg, and Fe(III) stability constants, pFe and species distribution in nutrient solution and soil conditions were determined. The iron chelate stability constants were in order EDDHA > EDDH4MA > EDDH5MA > PDDHA. When pFe was calculated, the larger value corresponds to Fe‐EDDHA chelate at pH below 8; but at pH above 8 the Fe‐EDDH4MA shows the larger pFe values. When the species was plotted against pH, the dominant species was FeL^? at the physiological pH range in all cases. The pH at a FeL/L_T ratio of 80% in both Fe(OH)_3amorp and Fe_soil systems was considered as an iron chelate stability index. This index was EDDH4MA > EDDH5MA > EDDHA > PDDHA in both systems, but shows that all of the chelates tested were sufficiently stable in most soil and nutrient solution conditions. In conclusion, the proposed procedure is adequate for the preliminary evaluation of the synthetic chelating agents, using important parameters such as analytical and speciation properties to predict their chelating behavior and efficiency in nutrient solution and soil conditions.     

Prevention of Iron‐Deficiency Induced Chlorosis in Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) Through Soil Application of Synthetic Vivianite in a Calcareous Soil

Abstract

In this study we have tested the hypothesis that lime‐induced Fe deficiency chlorosis of kiwifruit may be prevented by the application of a synthetic iron(II)‐phosphate analogous to the mineral vivianite [(Fe₃(PO₄)₂·8H₂O)]. Two experiments, under greenhouse and field conditions, were performed. In the greenhouse, 1‐year old micropropagated plants (Actinidia deliciosa, cv. Hayward), grown in 3‐L pots on a calcareous soil, were treated in early autumn with soil‐applied: (1) synthetic vivianite (1.35 g plant^?1) and (2) Fe‐EDDHA (24 mg Fe plant^?1). The synthetic vivianite suspension, prepared by dissolving ferrous sulfate and mono‐ammonium phosphate, was injected into the soil as a sole application whereas the Fe‐EDDHA solution was applied four times at weekly intervals. The field experiment was conducted in a mature drip‐irrigated kiwifruit orchard located on a calcareous soil in the Eastern Po Valley (Italy). Treatments were performed in early autumn by injecting synthetic vivianite (1.8 kg tree^?1) and Fe‐EDDHA (600 mg Fe tree^?1) into four holes in the soil around each tree, at a depth of 25–30 cm. The Fe‐chelate application was repeated at the same rate in the following spring. Untreated (control) plants were used in both experiments. Autumn‐applied Fe fertilisers significantly prevented development of Fe chlorosis under greenhouse conditions whereas in the field only vivianite was effective. In conclusion, these 1‐year results show that vivianite represents an effective alternative to soil‐applied Fe chelates for preventing Fe chlorosis in kiwifruit orchards.     

Effects of Fe compounds on nutrient uptake by plants grown in sand media with different pH

The effect of soil and foliar application of different iron (Fe) compounds (FeSO₄, Fe‐EDTA, Fe‐EDDS, and Fe‐EDDHA) on nutrient concentrations in lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv. Australian gelber) and ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Prego) was investigated in a greenhouse pot experiment using quartz sand as growth medium. Soil application was performed in both the acidic and alkaline pH range, and foliar application to plants grown in the alkaline sand only. Lettuce growth was depressed by Fe deficiency in the alkaline sand, whereas the treatments had no effect on ryegrass growth. Soil‐applied Fe compounds raised the Fe concentrations in lettuce. This was especially true for the Fe chelates, which also increased yields. Soil‐applied Fe compounds had no statistically significant effect on Fe concentrations in ryegrass. Concentrations of manganese (Mn) in lettuce were equally decreased by all soil‐applied chelates. In the alkaline sand, soil application of Fe‐EDDHA elevated copper (Cu) and depressed zinc (Zn) concentrations in lettuce. The chelates increased Zn concentration in ryegrass. Foliar application of Fe‐EDDS increased Fe concentrations in lettuce and in ryegrass most. Fe‐EDDHA depressed Mn and Zn concentrations in lettuce more than other Fe compounds, suggesting the existence of another mechanism, in addition to Fe, that transmits a corresponding signal from shoot to roots with an impact on uptake of micronutrients.     

Comparison of iron chelates and complexes supplied as foliar sprays and in nutrient solution to correct iron chlorosis of soybean

The application of synthetic chelates is the most efficient remedy for correcting iron (Fe) chlorosis. However, chelates are usually expensive and nondegradable products. Recently, new degradable chelates have been proposed for their use as Fe fertilizers. Also, Fe complexes cheaper than synthetic chelates and derived from natural products are also used to correct Fe deficiencies. Fifteen products, including five different synthetic chelates (Fe‐EDDS, Fe‐IDHA, and three Fe‐EDTA formulations) and ten natural complexes (humates, lignosulfonates, amino acids, glycoproteins, polyamines, citrate, and gluconate), have been compared when applied at low concentration to soybean (Glycine max L.) chlorotic plants grown in hydroponics under controlled conditions. In the first experiment, Fe compounds were applied to the nutrient solution, while in the second trial, Fe was foliar‐supplied. Dry matter, Fe concentration in shoots and roots, and SPAD values were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Fe in the different products. In the nutrient‐solution experiment, synthetic chelates provided better plant growth, Fe concentration, and SPAD values than complexes. Among the Fe complexes, transferrin generally provided good plant responses, similar to those obtained with synthetic chelates. After foliar application, the highest regreening was observed for plants treated with synthetic chelates and amino acid complexes, but the translocation to roots only occurred for Fe lignosulfonate. Fe‐EDDS and Fe‐EDTA performed in a similar way when applied in nutrient solution or as foliar sprays.     

Timing and rate of iron chelate application to correct chlorosis of peanut

The timing and rate of application of iron (Fe) chelates (seques‐trene 138 Fe) to correct Fe chlorosis of peanut grown on calcareous soils was studied for three seasons (1985–87) in seven experiments. It was found that the biological yield of peanut increased up to the highest rate of chelate used (8 g/m²). However, under the existing prices of the chelate and peanuts, application is financially untenable above 4 g/m². The time of chelate application should not be at sowing, but after the crop becomes chlorotic. Even though the yield differences between early application at branching, 25 to 30 days after emergence, and an application at anthesis, 45 to 50 days after emergence, was small, the trend in yield and size of nuts favored the earlier application. Therefore, it is recommended that the application of the Fe chelate be at the early stages of plant development, particularly in cases of severe chlorosis.     

Influence of micronutrient and phosphorous levels and chelator to iron ratio on growth,chlorosis, and nutrition of bluecrop highbush blueberries

‘Bluecrop’ blueberry plants were exposed to 2×2×2 factorial treatments of high and low phosphate and micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, and B) and excess or stoichiometric concentrations of a chelator (EDDHA) added to Fe(NO₃), in pH 6.8 solution cultures. The effects on growth, Fe chlorosis and overall nutrition were accessed. Phosphorous was applied at 20 (low) or 400 (high) μM levels, micronutrients at low or high levels and either a 1:1 or 10:1 ratio of chelator to Fe concentration. Plants grown in excess chelator and low micronutrient supply grew normally. Plants grown in all high micronutrient solutions were chlorotic after 34 days. Plants in low micronutrient and stochiometric chelator to Fe ratio solutions were also chlorotic.

Foliar Fe was not a good indicator of Fe chlorosis development. High Cu levels in roots grown in high micronutrients without excess chelator may have been a causative factor in Fe chlorosis development, but not in reducing foliar Fe levels. There was no indication that excess chelator facilitated Fe transport as has been reported for other crops. However, this work demonstrates that highbush blueberry has an effective ability to absorb Fe from strong Fe chelates and remain non‐chlorotic even at high solution pH levels under an all nitrate‐nitrogen regime. Chemical name used: EDDHA‐ethylenediaminedi‐o‐hydroxyphenlyacetic acid.     

Influence of the soil/solution ratio, interaction time, and extractant on the evaluation of iron chelate sorption/desorption by soils

Synthetic Fe chelates are the most efficient agricultural practice to control Fe deficiency in crops, EDTA/Fe3+ and o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ being the most commonly used. Their efficacy as Fe sources and carriers in soils can be severely limited by their retention on it. The aim of this work is to evaluate the possible bias introduced in the studies of the iron chelate retention by soils. For that purpose, results obtained for EDTA and EDDHA iron chelates from two batch studies with different soil/solution ratios were compared with data obtained for a leaching column experiment. Moreover, different extractants were tested to study the o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ and o,p-EDDHA/Fe3+ desorption from a calcareous soil, and also the effect of the interaction time in their retention process has been evaluated. In summary, the mobility through a calcareous soil of the studied iron chelates differs greatly depending on the type of iron chelate and also on the procedure used to evaluate the retention and the soil/solution ratio used. In general, the leaching column method is preferred because the achieved conclusions are more representative of the natural conditions, but batch methods are very useful as a preliminary experiment, especially one with a high soil/solution ratio. The iron chelate desorption could be quantified by using a sequential extraction with water, sodium sulfate, and DTPA as extractants. Under the experimental conditions used in this study, o,o-EDDHA/Fe3+ retention increased with interaction time.     

Glutathione foliar fertilisation prevents lime‐induced iron chlorosis in soil grown Medicago scutellata

It has been proposed that glutathione can relieve the effects of Fe deficiency. This study tested the effects of glutathione foliar treatments to prevent Fe chlorosis, using as positive controls soil and foliar Fe fertilisation. Medicago scutellata plants were grown in soil (5.7% CaCO₃) supplemented or not with 4 and 8% CaCO₃. Two Fe(III)‐EDDHA soil treatments (5 and 10 mg Fe kg^?1), and three foliar treatments (three applications each of 2.14 mM Fe(III)‐EDDHA, 1 mM glutathione, and the previous two combined) were applied. Measurements include leaf chlorophyll and Fe concentrations, biomass, leaf enzymatic and non‐enzymatic antioxidant systems and carboxylates. The addition of CaCO₃ caused typical Fe deficiency symptoms, including changes in chlorophyll, Fe, antioxidant systems and carboxylates, which were prevented by soil and foliar Fe fertilisation. The foliar treatment with glutathione also led to higher chlorophyll, leaf extractable Fe and root Fe, as well as decreases in some antioxidant systems, whereas leaf Fe concentrations decreased. The combined foliar application of glutathione and Fe was even more efficient in preventing chlorosis. Including glutathione in foliar fertilisation programs should be considered as an option for Fe chlorosis prevention, especially when relatively large leaf total Fe concentrations occur in the so called chlorosis paradox.     

树干高压注射铁肥矫正苹果失绿症及其机理

利用N-Fe、邻二氮杂菲铁和.59Fe作为铁源,以3-8年生富士／八棱海棠为试材进行主干强力高压注射试验。结果表明,铁肥树干强力高压注射,主要以二价铁(Fe2+)沿中央木质部的导管运输,大部分向下运输,使铁在根中大量贮存;向上运输较少,运输速度为每小时数百厘米,矫正缺铁失绿症的速度比根系输液慢,但由于根中贮存大量的铁,持效期较长。主干强力高压注射产生肥害的机理是先使吸收根中毒,然后导致叶片枯萎,提高注射部位,提高注射液浓度和减少注射的用药量,可以防止或减轻肥害的产生。     

Synthesis of o,p-EDDHA and its detection as the main impurity in o,o-EDDHA commercial iron chelates

Ethylenediamine-N,N'bis(o-hydroxyphenyl)acetic acid (o,o-EDDHA) is one of the most efficient iron chelates employed to relieve iron chlorosis in plants. However, the presence of positional isomers of EDDHA in commercial iron chelates has been recently demonstrated, and among them, it has been claimed that ethylenediamine-N(o-hydroxyphenylacetic)-N'(p-hydroxyphenylacetic) acid (o,p-EDDHA) is the main impurity present in EDDHA fertilizers. Here we report the preparation of o,p-EDDHA, a compound whose synthesis had not been previously reported. The synthetic o,p-EDDHA is able to form ferric complexes, and it has been used as a standard in the analysis of the impurities of commercial iron fertilizers. The presence of o,p-EDDHA/Fe(3+) in commercial samples has been unambiguously demonstrated by HPLC.     

花生缺铁黄化的敏感时期及耐低铁品种的筛选指标

采用盆栽试验,系统研究了石灰性土壤上16个花生品种在各个生育时期新叶的黄化度、叶绿素值、活性铁含量的差异及其动态变化。结果表明,缺铁胁迫下花生耐低铁和铁敏感品种间叶片的黄化程度存在着显著差异,大多数铁敏感品种在出苗后50～65 d时黄化度最高。供试16个品种顶部新展开叶片的叶绿素值（SPAD值）和活性铁含量在整个生育期的变幅分别为4.5～34.6和8.0～36.3 mg/kg, FW,随生长时间的延长两者均呈高―低―高的动态变化趋势。在生长前期,耐低铁品种新叶的叶绿素值和活性铁含量均显著高于铁敏感品种;开花期是花生对缺铁胁迫最为敏感的时期,此阶段黄化现象最严重、各品种新叶的叶绿素值和活性铁含量最低。相关分析表明,在生长前期叶绿素值与黄化度、活性铁及荚果产量之间均呈极显著的相关关系。新叶叶绿素值可作为花生耐低铁品种筛选的一可靠指标。     

Characterization of commercial iron chelates and their behavior in an alkaline and calcareous soil

Iron deficiency is a common problem for many plants grown in alkaline and calcareous soils. To correct this problem, iron is supplied to plants as chelates. Several iron chelates are sold under diverse trademarks with different characteristics. This work evaluated 18 commercial products containing the most representative chelated iron sources used in agricultural practice in Spain when the study was done, namely the ferric chelates of EDDHA, EDDHMA, EDDCHA, EDDHSA, EDTA, and DTPA. The chelates were comprehensively characterized and quantitated by several techniques, including several chromatographic methods. Iron and chelate dynamics in soil were also studied in a model alkaline and calcareous soil. Results indicate that, in this model soil, among the different iron compounds studied only FeEDDHA and analogues have the capacity to maintain soluble iron in soil solution over time. These results are in agreement with general experience under field conditions. Furthermore, among the different ortho-ortho isomers of FeEDDHA's, FeEDDHSA and FeEDDCHA showed greater capacity than FeEDDHA and FeEDDHMA to maintain the chelated iron in soil solution over time.