共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
在我国"走出去"与"引进来"战略推动下,我国木材产业的发展持续加快,进出口贸易水平显著提升。中美贸易争端的不断升级,给我国木材进出口带来了一定的压力与挑战。阐述了中美贸易争端基本现状,分析了我国木材进出口贸易企业所受到的影响,在此基础上提出了相关应对策略,这对于我国木材企业更好地融入国际市场,提升市场竞争力具有重要意义。 相似文献
4.
5.
应对国际林产品贸易面临的新挑战 总被引:4,自引:2,他引:2
伴随着林产品贸易规模的扩大, 中国林产品贸易环境面临不断恶化的风险。金融危机、森林认证和雷斯法案构成了中国林产品贸易环境变化的主要因素。如何应对林产品贸易面临的新挑战成为制约中国林产品贸易发展的首要问题。文中首先分析中国林产品贸易环境的构成因素并简要介绍各个因素产生和发展的背景; 在此基础上, 结合中国林产品贸易的实际情况, 对不同因素的影响分别予以分析; 最后, 针对贸易环境不同层次的特点, 提出应对国际林产品贸易环境变化的系统性的政策建议。 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
针对美国次贷危机对木材贸易的影响,以迪拜和BIG5展会上的木材交易为实证,分析了木材贸易在次贷危机中所面临的主要问题,指出了木材贸易所面临的世界通缩国内通胀的挑战和机遇,为木材贸易应对危机提出了维护老客户、开发新兴市场、建立知识产权和品牌,调整产品结构、双向贸易等相应措施。 相似文献
10.
11.
文中运用复杂网络拓扑结构指标,从整体网络形态和局部结构特征2个方面分析和比较了美国《雷斯法修正案》和《欧盟木材法案》对世界原木贸易网络结构的影响,结果表明:2000—2015年全球金融危机造成了整体贸易关系数量的大幅下降;《雷斯法修正案》的实施未对原木贸易网络产生显著影响,主要表现于内部结构调整,以核心国家为中心的局部集中化程度呈此消彼长态势;《欧盟木材法案》影响程度较低。 相似文献
12.
推动作为林产品的珍稀濒危物种可持续经营认证对于保护生物、生态环境的多样性、促进森林可持续经营具有重要意义。通过分析《雷斯法案》修正案对珍稀濒危物种可持续经营认证及国际贸易的影响,以ICUN极危物种铁皮石斛Dendrobiumofficinale为例,提出作为生产者要积极开展森林可持续认证,为产品开拓国际市场,同时对于珍稀濒危物种的生产要积极开展去濒工作,助力其国际市场的形成,推动森林认证市场驱动力的提升。 相似文献
13.
14.
The US and EU markets are the main destinations of Chinese forest products.Through analyzing the similarities and differences between the US Lacey Act Amendment and the EU Timber Regulation,the paper focused on how to realize better compatibility and practicality of Chinese timber legality verification scheme in terms of verification standard setting,verification procedures,pilot work of timber legality verification scheme,capacity-building trainings and studies on key problems. 相似文献
15.
从林业地位、森林资源和林产品贸易三个方面介绍了巴西林业的概况,并在分析巴西林产品贸易特点的基础上,总结出对我国林产品贸易的4点启示,即要拓宽国内外市场,保证供需;稳扎稳打步步为营,形成优势出口产品品牌;内外兼顾,完善本国对外贸易法规;防微杜渐,提高管理和科技水平。巴西是世界生物资源和森林资源最为丰富的国家之一,总结和借鉴巴西林产品贸易情况对推动和促进我国林产品贸易及林业产业发展具有重要意义。 相似文献
16.
按照服务国家外交、外贸2个大局,我国正在加强实施林业“走出去”战略,寻求多元化的林业国际合作。洪都拉斯位于中美洲北部,水热条件良好,森林资源丰富,是我国在拉美地区开展林业双边合作的潜在国家。文中介绍了洪都拉斯森林资源状况、林业法规政策、林业管理体制、森林经营管理和林产品贸易等现状,归纳了洪都拉斯林业存在的问题,展望了我国林业未来与之在天然林可持续经营、发展人工林、林产品加工和林业扶贫减贫等重点领域的合作前景,以期为我国未来与之开展林业双边合作提供参考,有利于我国在拉美地区树立林业双边合作的样板,提升我国在该地区的形象与影响力。 相似文献
17.
The Lacey Act of 1900 was amended on May 22, 2008, to prohibit the import of illegally sourced plant materials and products manufactured from them into the United States and its territories, and to similarly ban their interstate transport. Trade theory suggests that the effect of the new law would be to reduce the flow of illegally sourced fiber into the United States, increasing prices. Monthly U.S. import data on tropical lumber (January 1989–June 2013) and hardwood plywood (January 1996–June 2013) quantity and unit value were used to estimate alternative statistical models that quantify the impact of the 2008 Lacey Act Amendment on import prices and import quantities of products from potential source countries. Results show that the Amendment's quantity effects are generally negative and double in magnitude in percentage terms than the price effects, consistent with expectations of the effects of a backwards shift in foreign supply against an elastic import demand. Models indicate that there have been double-digit percentage increases in prices and decreases in quantities of tropical lumber imports from Bolivia, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Peru. Similarly large changes in hardwood plywood import prices and quantities from Brazil, Indonesia, and Malaysia have occurred, while smaller, and in some cases statistically insignificant, changes have been observed for hardwood plywood imports from China, Ecuador, and Taiwan. 相似文献
18.
Teemu Harrinkari Pia Katila Heimo Karppinen 《Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research》2017,32(1):6-18
Major revisions of the Finnish Forest Act were carried out in 1994–1996 and 2010–2013. The need for revision emerged from societal changes and changes in the forest sector’s operational environment that related to the globalisation of markets and influences of international policies. This study analysed the influences of global and European Union forest and environmental policies on the revision of the Forest Act by combining advocacy coalition framework with the four pathways of influence framework introduced by Bernstein and Cashore. The results show that the three identified advocacy coalitions, namely Forestry administration, Private forestry and Environmental coalition remained rather stable over the two revision processes from 1990s to 2010s. The importance of the different pathways of international influence differed between the coalitions. Private forestry and Forestry administration coalitions, which represented forestry paradigm, stressed market-related arguments, whereas Environmental coalition representing environmental paradigm mainly referred to international legally binding rules and non-legally binding initiatives. The argumentation of the actors indicated that international rules and international norms and discourse were regarded to be as equally important. 相似文献