| 黄淮海地区夏大豆品种比较试验初报 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 卜新华,侯定臣,赵铁锁.黄淮海地区夏大豆品种比较试验初报[J].山西农业科学,2000,28(2):41-43. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 卜新华 侯定臣 赵铁锁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 太原市小店区农技中心,山西,太原,030032
2. 太原市种子公司,山西,太原,030002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对 12个夏大豆品种进行比较试验 ,结果表明 ,中作 96 6产量居第 1位 ,平均为 370 2kg/hm2 ,比对照早熟 18增产 9.9% ;太 96 - 38居第 2位 ,平均产量 342 7.5kg/hm2 ,比对照增产 1.7%。但产量居前 3位的品种均比对照晚熟 ,生育日数超过 10 0d ,不适宜在太原地区种植 ,在临汾、运城无霜期较长的地区可以作夏播品种应用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 夏大豆 品种 生育期 丰产性 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-2481(2000)02-0041-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 1999年12月7日 |
Preliminary Study of Comparing Summer Soybean Varieties of Huang - Huai - Hai Area |
| |
| BU Xin-hua,HOU Ding-chen,ZHAO Tie-suo.Preliminary Study of Comparing Summer Soybean Varieties of Huang - Huai - Hai Area[J].Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences,2000,28(2):41-43. |
| |
| Authors: | BU Xin-hua HOU Ding-chen ZHAO Tie-suo |
| |
| Abstract: | Yield results showed that ZHONGZUO 966 ranked first, it had an average yield of 3 702kg/hm 2, 9.9% higher than ZAOSHU 18, the control; TAI 96-38 ranked second with the average yield of 3 427 kg/hm 2, 1.7% higher than CK. However, the first three varieties matured later than CK, their growth period were over 100d. The three varieties could be planted as summer sowing varieties in the area with long frost-freeing period such as Linfen and Yuncheng, but not in Taiyuan. |
| |
| Keywords: | Soybean Varieties Growth period High yielding character |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
