首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Advancing research on urban greenspace experiences and perceptions in disadvantaged communities: A social housing perspective
Affiliation:1. School of Ecosystem and Forest Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Australia;2. Departmeng of Geography, Geomatics and Environment, University of Toronto, Canada;3. School of Business, Law, and Entrepreneurship, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia;4. Melbourne School of Design, The University of Melbourne, Australia;5. Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Melbourne, Australia;6. Department of Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada;7. King''s Business School, King''s College London, Monash University, Australia;1. Guangzhou Institute of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Guangzhou 510405, China;2. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China;1. School of Public Policy and Government, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil;2. University of Brasilia, School of Public Health, Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil;3. University of Brasilia, Geoscience Institute, Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil;4. University of Brasilia, Planaltina, Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil;5. University of Brasilia, Ceilândia, Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil;1. Department of Landscape Architecture, Landscape Planning Laboratory, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110866, China;2. School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Rd., Shanghai 200240, China;3. Key Laboratory of Forest Tree Genetics, Breeding and Cultivation of Liaoning Province, China;4. Shanghai Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, China;5. Shanghai Yangtze River Delta Eco-Environmental Change and Management Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China;1. Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Management, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3. College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, 800 Reserve Street, Stevens Point, WI 54481, USA;4. Department of Human Resources Management, School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;5. Environment and Resources College, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China;1. Global Environment Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea;2. Natural Environment Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea;3. Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Abstract:Empirical assessments of the experiences and perceptions of urban green space (UGS) in a social housing context are scant. Studying UGS perception in these contexts is important to understand how people experience and derive benefits from UGS in disadvantaged communities. This short communication provides interdisciplinary and methodological guidance on how to conduct empirical assessment of UGS experience and perception in social housing neighborhoods. For conducting these types of studies, we suggest researchers go beyond simply calculating UGS abundance around communities and consider assessing UGS experiences and perceptions. We suggest designing studies that account for the mixed nature of many social housing communities and that develop useful UGS perception measures that can be associated with wellbeing and community indicators. Finally, we also recommend: (1) designing studies at the local scale and developing strong relationsihps with the social housing communities before and while conducting these studies; (2) considering safety as a key component of UGS perception measures; (3) considering the association between UGS perception measures and wellbeing and community experience indicators to strengthen existing models of UGS benefit provision.
Keywords:Public housing  Urban greening  Green infrastructure  Environmental equity  Environmental attitudes  Community attitudes
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号