首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

黄土高原丘陵区水土流失综合治理生态环境效应评价
引用本文:王 兵,张光辉,刘国彬,杨勤科,杨艳芬. 黄土高原丘陵区水土流失综合治理生态环境效应评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(20): 150-161
作者姓名:王 兵  张光辉  刘国彬  杨勤科  杨艳芬
作者单位:1. 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院,北京 100875
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,杨凌 712100
3. 西北大学城市与环境学院,西安 710127
4. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,中国科学院生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
基金项目:中国科学院战略性先导科技专项:退耕还林(草)工程固碳速率和潜力研究(XDA05060300);中国科学院百人计划支持项目。
摘    要:生态环境的层次性、复杂性和多变性,决定了对其质量进行评价的难度。确立构建一套合理、科学,在解决同一类问题中具有代表性的指标体系和评价方法,是众多学者长久以来关注的关键问题。该文以延安水土保持与生态环境建设试验示范区为实证对象,选取灰色关联度法、综合评价法和驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应多方案综合决策支持系统(driving force pressure state impact response framework-multiple decision support system,DPSIR-mDSS)对研究区域1999-2009年水土流失综合治理生态恢复环境效应进行了评家,结果表明:DPSIR-mDSS模型在构建水土流失综合治理生态恢复环境效应评价指标体系时将人类社会行为和经济行为与环境系统间复杂的相互关系简化为一对一因果链,评价过程得以分解、简化,且评价结果与研究区域生态恢复环境效应实际变化情况一致,能较好的解释研究区域水土流失综合治理生态恢复环境效应随时间的变化情况,为生态恢复环境效应评价提供了一种新的评价思路和方法。总体而言,退耕还林(草)工程的实施极大的促进了研究区生态环境状况,但一些新的问题诸如耕地压力、生态需水亏缺等接踵而至,应在今后予以重视。

关 键 词:生态  治理  模型  质量评价  多方案综合决策支持系统  退耕还林(草)  黄土丘陵区
收稿时间:2011-12-05
修稿时间:2012-07-15

Ecological and environmental evaluation for water and soil loss comprehensive harness in Loess hilly region
Wang Bing,Zhang Guanghui,Liu Guobin,Yang Qinke,and Yang Yanfen. Ecological and environmental evaluation for water and soil loss comprehensive harness in Loess hilly region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(20): 150-161
Authors:Wang Bing  Zhang Guanghui  Liu Guobin  Yang Qinke  and Yang Yanfen
Affiliation:1. School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Water and Soil Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China; 3. College of Urbun and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)
Abstract:Hierarchy, complexity and polytropy of eco-environment determine the difficulty in accessing its quality. It is a key issue that many scholars concern for a long time in establishing a set of index system and evaluation method, which is reasonable, scientific and representative in solving the same kind of problem. Methods of Grey relation degree, comprehensive evaluation and DPSIR-mDSS model (driving force, pressure, state, impact, response framework-multiple decision support system) were adopted to compare their difference in accessing eco-environmental effects. Meanwhile, demonstration area of soil conservation and eco-environment construction in Yan'an was taken as a study object to access environmental effects of ecological restoration of water and soil loss comprehensive harness from 1999 to 2009. The results showed that complicated relationship between human social and economic behavior and environmental system could be simplified to "one to one" causal chain by DPSIR model in constructing index system for accessing environmental effect of ecological restoration of water and soil loss comprehensive harness, accessing process could be decomposed and simplified. Also, the evaluation results of DPSIR-mDSS model was consistent with the actual situation of ecological restoration effects of study area, and would be better explained the variation of ecological restoration effects of water and soil loss comprehensive harness with time, which also provide a new method for ecological restoration effects assessment. In general, the eco-environmental status improved greatly due to the implement of "grain for green" project. However, more attention should be paid to problems in the future, such as pressure on cropland and ecological water storage deficit.
Keywords:ecology   control   models   quality assessment   multiple decision support systems   grain for green   Loess hilly region
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号