首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

土地整治规划综合效益评价
引用本文:于跃,张延军,宋广伟,郭久艳,刘琛.土地整治规划综合效益评价[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(23):70-74.
作者姓名:于跃  张延军  宋广伟  郭久艳  刘琛
作者单位:1. 伊通满族自治县国土资源局2. 吉林大学地球科学学院
基金项目:伊通满族自治县土地整治规划(2011-2015)编制研究
摘    要:为了有效评估土地整治规划制定的科学性,指导土地整治工作顺利进行,以伊通满族自治县土地整治规划(2011—2015)为研究实例,根据研究地区伊通满族自治县的实际情况,从生态影响、经济影响和社会影响3方面进行分析,建立了一套科学的综合效益评价指标体系。同时,利用层次分析法,将每项指标进行赋值,评判出经过土地整治之后的综合效益变化结果。结果表明:(1)规划实施后,该地区生态影响分值为0.2998,经济影响分值为0.5400,社会影响分值为0.1565,综合影响得分为0.9663;(2)本轮规划比规划初始年综合影响分值增加0.1122,说明土地整治对环境有一定的提升作用。因此,土地整治规划综合效益影响评价为土地整治规划的有效实施提供科学的依据和现实的保障。

关 键 词:马铃薯  马铃薯  二倍体  NaCl胁迫  耐盐性  筛选  
收稿时间:2013/11/14 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/12/24 0:00:00

Comprehensive Benefits Evaluation of Land Rearrangement Planning
Abstract:In order to assess the scientificity of land rearrangement planning and guide the process as well, with land rearrangement planning to Yitong Manchu Autonomous County, according to the actual situation in Yitong Manchu Autonomous County, with analyzing from natural effects, economic effects and social effects, the author set up a scientific evaluation index system of comprehensive benefits impact assessment. In the meantime, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assign every index, the author evaluated how much comprehensive benefits had changed after the land consolidation. The results showed that: (1) after the implementation planning, the score of nature affect was 0.2998, the economic impact score was 0.5400, and social impact score was 0.1565, and the score of comprehensive influence was 0.9663; (2) which was 0.1123 higher than the planning initial year. All proved that land consolidation had a certain improvement effect on environment. Hence people could gain scientific basis and the reality of security from implementing the comprehensive benefits of land rearrangement planning effectively.
Keywords:Yitong Manchu Autonomous County
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号