首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

利用冠层分析仪测算苹果园叶面积指数及其可靠性分析
引用本文:张继祥,魏钦平,张静,王连新,孙协平,王翠玲,宋凯.利用冠层分析仪测算苹果园叶面积指数及其可靠性分析[J].园艺学报,2010,37(2):185-192.
作者姓名:张继祥  魏钦平  张静  王连新  孙协平  王翠玲  宋凯
作者单位:( 山东农业大学园艺科学与工程学院,作物生物学国家重点实验室,山东泰安 271018; 北京市农林科学院林业果树研究所,北京 100093; 山东省蓬莱市农业局果树站,山东蓬莱 265600)
基金项目:国家现代苹果产业技术体系(MATS)功能岗位专家项目,国家高技术研究发展计划['863'计划]项目,国家科技支撑计划项目 
摘    要:以山东省苹果主产区成龄密植园、间伐园和疏枝园苹果树为材料,利用方框取样法(直接法,di)和冠层分析仪法(间接法,in)分别测定了叶面积指数(LAI)。结果表明:冠层分析仪法与方框取样法测量的LAI 平均值分别为3.0±0.2 和4.3±0.2,前者比后者平均低30.2%,且随着LAI 增加,二者相差增大.密植园、间伐园和疏枝园相应偏低32.0%、35.5%和25.0%。统计分析表明,LAIdi 与LAIin 相关性极显著,密植园、间伐园和疏枝园中的相关系数(r)分别为0.91、0.89 和0.92。把冠层分析仪鱼眼摄像头最外圈去掉(平均视天顶角为68º)LAIdi 与LAIin 之间相差在13%以内,校正后密植园、间伐园和疏枝园中二者的相关系数(r)分别为0.93、0.93 和0.94。尽管方框取样法和冠层分析仪法测量的LAI 具有极显著的相关性,但冠层分析仪法的测值偏低,因此,在应用冠层分析仪估计苹果园的LAI 时,要改进冠层分析仪的测量方法,并利用方框取样法测得的结果对其进行校正,以便提高准确性。在本研究中,密植园、间伐园和疏枝园内冠层分析仪的校正系数分别为1.3004、1.2077 和1.1762。

关 键 词:苹果  果园  叶面积指数  冠层分析仪  方框取样法  
收稿时间:2009-8-31
修稿时间:2009-12-28

Leaf Area Index Estimated with Plant Canopy Analyzer in Apple Orchards and Analysis of Its Reliability
ZHANG Ji-xiang,WEI Qin-ping,ZHANG Jing,WANG Lian-xin,SUN Xie-ping,WANG Cui-ling, SONG Kai.Leaf Area Index Estimated with Plant Canopy Analyzer in Apple Orchards and Analysis of Its Reliability[J].Acta Horticulturae Sinica,2010,37(2):185-192.
Authors:ZHANG Ji-xiang  WEI Qin-ping  ZHANG Jing  WANG Lian-xin  SUN Xie-ping  WANG Cui-ling    SONG Kai
Institution:(;1.State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology,College of Horticultural Science and Engineering,Shandong Agricultural University,Tai’an,Shandong 271018,China;;2.Institute of Forestry & Pomology,Beijing Academy of Agriculture & Forestry Sciences,Beijing 100093,China;;3.Pomology Station,Penglai Bureau of Agriculture,Penglai,Shandong 265600,China)
Abstract:It was studied that leaf area index(LAIs)were respectively estimated with sampling with a cubic frame(direct method)and using a plant canopy analyzer(indirect method)in more than 40 adult apple orchards(including unthinned,thinned and partially-cut-branch orchards)selected randomly in Shandong Province.The results showed that LAIs estimated with direct and indirect methods in all orchards tested were3.0±0.2 and 4.3 ±0.2,respectively.Compared to LAI with the direct method(LAI_(di)),average underestimation of LAIs with indirect method(LAI_(in))was 30.2%,in which the underestimation of LAIs were32.0%,35.5% and 25.0%,respectively in unthinned,thinned and partially-cut-branch orchards.In addition,the larger LAI was,the more serious underestimation was in various types of orchards.LAIs estimated with direct and indirect methods were strongly and linearly interrelated to each other(r = 0.91,0.89 and 0.92,respectively,in three types of orchards,P<0.00001).When omitting the reading of the external ring of the plant canopy analyzer and being recalculated,the linear correlation between LAI_(di) and LAI_(in) was more significant(r = 0.93,0.93 and 0.94,respectively,in three types of orchards,P<0.00001),and the difference became less(less than 13%).When LAI of apple orchards is estimated by a plant canopy analyzer,further correction of the data can improve its performance and produce reliable estimation through being modified by direct reference measurement.At this study,the modified coefficients of plant canopy analyzer were 1.3004,1.2007 and 1.1762,respectively,in three types of orchards,that is to say,real LAIs in three types of orchards were about 1.3,1.2 and 1.2 times respectively,more than estimated values(modified)of plant canopy analyzer.
Keywords:apple  orchard  leaf area index  plant canopy analyzer  sampling with a cubic frame
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《园艺学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《园艺学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号