首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

直播方式对水稻生理性状和产量的影响及其成本分析
引用本文:张耗,余超,陈可伟,孔祥胜,刘海浪,陈俊义,顾骏飞,刘立军,王志琴,杨建昌. 直播方式对水稻生理性状和产量的影响及其成本分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(13): 58-64. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.13.008
作者姓名:张耗  余超  陈可伟  孔祥胜  刘海浪  陈俊义  顾骏飞  刘立军  王志琴  杨建昌
作者单位:1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理国家重点实验室培育点/粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心,扬州,225009;2. 江苏省宜兴市农林局农业技术推广中心,宜兴,214206
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划973项目(2015CB150404);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300206-4);中国科协青年人才托举工程项目(2016QNRC001);江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(15KJA210005);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目;扬州大学高端人才支持计划
摘    要:为探讨水稻不同直播方式对产量和生理特性以及成本的影响,该文设置了旱直播、水直播和机条播3种直播方式,研究了水稻的产量表现、群体发育、生理特征以及经济效益。结果表明,与旱直播相比,机条播和水直播的产量分别增加了11.9%和6.3%,氮肥农学利用率分别增加了10.1%和4.9%。从产量构成因素分析,产量的提高主要得益于单位面积穗数的增多。机条播显著提高了茎蘖成穗率、花后与成熟期干物质积累量、生长中后期的茎蘖数、叶面积指数与持续期、群体生长速率、叶片光合速率和根系氧化力。机条播因其机械作业效率高、费用低以及除草成本低使得总成本降低和经济效益提高,说明机条播方式提高了直播水稻叶片光合性能,并促进了地上部群体合理生长和地下部根系活力,从而获得了较高的产量和经济效益。

关 键 词:农作物  机械化  土壤  水稻  直播  产量  生理  成本
收稿时间:2017-01-22
修稿时间:2017-05-10

Effect of direct-seeding methods on physiological characteristics and grain yield of rice and its cost analysis
Zhang Hao,Yu Chao,Chen Kewei,Kong Xiangsheng,Liu Hailang,Chen Junyi,Gu Junfei,Liu Lijun,Wang Zhiqin and Yang Jianchang. Effect of direct-seeding methods on physiological characteristics and grain yield of rice and its cost analysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(13): 58-64. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.13.008
Authors:Zhang Hao  Yu Chao  Chen Kewei  Kong Xiangsheng  Liu Hailang  Chen Junyi  Gu Junfei  Liu Lijun  Wang Zhiqin  Yang Jianchang
Affiliation:1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;,1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;,2. Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Agricultural and Forestry Bureau, Jiangsu Province, Yixing 214206, China;,1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;,1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;,2. Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Agricultural and Forestry Bureau, Jiangsu Province, Yixing 214206, China;,1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;,1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;,1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; and 1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;
Abstract:Abstract: Little is known about the differences on yield performance, population development, physiological characteristics, cost and economic benefit among different direct-seeding methods of rice. Three direct-seeding methods, manual direct-seeding on dry land (MaDD), manual direct-seeding on wet land (MaDW), and mechanical direct-seeding on wet land (MeDD), were applied. The experiments were conducted using conventional rice, Wuyunjing 23, to investigate the yield and its components, nitrogen use efficiency, number of tillers and productive tillers, dry matter accumulation of shoot and root, leaf photosynthetic rate, root oxidation activity, leaf area index and duration, crop growth rate and cost. The results showed that, compared with MaDD, MeDD and MaDW increased the grain yield by 10.2% and 4.9% and agronomic N use efficiency by 10.1% and 4.9%, respectively. From the yield components analysis, the increase in grain yield was mainly attributed to the increase in panicles per unit area. Compared with MaDD, MeDD significantly increased the number of tillers at heading and maturity stage and productive tillers. Except mid tillering stage, the shoot dry matter weight under MeDD and MaDW was greater than that under MaDD during whole growth period. The shoot dry matter weight under MeDD was greater than that under MaDW at maturity stage. Similar to shoot dry weight, root dry weight performed the same change trend during whole growth period. The ratio of root to shoot under MaDD was the greatest at mid tillering stage. There was no difference on the ratio of root to shoot among the 3 direct-seeding methods except mid tillering stage. Compared with MaDD, MeDD significantly increased the leaf photosynthetic rate and root oxidation activity of rice at heading and maturity stage. At mid tillering stage, there was no difference on leaf area index among 3 direct-seeding methods. Leaf area index under MeDD and MaDW was greater than that under MaDD at middle and late growth stage. Leaf area index under MeDD was greater than that under MaDW at maturity stage. At early growth stage (from sowing to panicle initiation stage), there was no difference on leaf area duration among 3 direct-seeding methods. Leaf area duration under MeDD and MaDW was greater than that under MaDD at middle and late growth stage (from panicle initiation to maturity stage). Leaf area duration under MeDD was greater than that under MaDW at grain filling stage. The crop growth rate showed the similar change trend as leaf area index. MeDD cost the minimum, 3 540 yuan per hectare in total, which included 1 350 yuan soil preparation cost, 450 yuan sowing cost, 1 140 yuan herbicide and employee cost and 600 yuan manual weeding and employee cost. Production value and total cost were 24 624 and 14 115 yuan per hectare under MeDD, respectively. Economic benefit, 10 509 yuan per hectare under MeDD, was higher than that of MaDD and MaDW. The results suggested that MeDD significantly increased productive tillers and dry matter accumulation from heading to maturity stage, and number of tillers, leaf area index and duration, crop growth rate, leaf photosynthetic rate and root oxidation activity at middle and late growth stage of rice. MeDD also decreased total cost and increased economic benefit because of its high efficiency and low cost in mechanical operation and low weeding cost. In conclusion, MeDD improves leaf photosynthetic performance and enhances aboveground population reasonable growth and underground root activity, and achieves higher grain yield and economic benefits.
Keywords:crops   mechanization   soils   rice   direct seeding   yield   physiology   cost
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号