首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparative study of antioxidant defence mechanisms in marine fish fed variable levels of oxidised oil and vitamin E
Authors:DR Tocher  G Mourente  A Van der Eecken  JO Evjemo  E Diaz  M Wille  JG Bell  Y Olsen
Institution:(1) Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK;(2) Departamento de Biología Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real (Cádiz), Andalucía, Spain;(3) Laboratory of Aquaculture and Artemia Reference Center, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium;(4) Department of Botany, Faculty of Chemistry and Biology, Brattøra Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway
Abstract:The aim of the study was to compare theantioxidant systems in juvenile marine fish ofcommercial importance to European aquaculture,namely turbot (Scophthalmus maximus),halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) andgilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Thepresent dietary trial was specifically designedto investigate the antioxidant effects ofvitamin E under moderate oxidising conditions,including high dietary levels of highlyunsaturated fatty acids and the feeding ofoxidised oils. The objective was to induce astressful pro-oxidant status to enablecharacterisation of the biochemical responsesto peroxidative stress without causingunnecessary suffering to the experimentalanimals or high mortalities during the trials. Both sea bream and turbot showed excellentgrowth, whereas growth was poorer in halibut.Dietary oxidised oil significantly reducedgrowth in turbot and especially in halibut, butnot in sea bream. Vitamin E improved growth insea bream fed oxidised oil but not in turbot orhalibut. However, vitamin E supplementationappeared to improve survival in all threespecies. In sea bream and turbot, liverantioxidant defence enzyme activities weregenerally increased by feeding peroxidised oiland reduced by vitamin E. Conversely, inhalibut, the liver antioxidant defence enzymeactivities were not increased by feedingperoxidised oil and only superoxide dismutasewas reduced by feeding vitamin E. Consistentwith these data, feeding oxidised oil increasedlipid peroxidation products in halibut, butgenerally not in sea bream or turbot.Furthermore, lipid peroxidation products weregenerally reduced by dietary vitamin E in bothsea bream and turbot, but not in halibut. Therefore, halibut liver antioxidant defenceenzymes did not respond to dietary oxidised oilor vitamin E as occurred in turbot and,especially sea bream. This resulted inincreased levels of lipid peroxides in halibutcompared to turbot and sea bream in fish givendietary oxidised oil. In addition, supplementalvitamin E did not reduce lipid peroxides inhalibut as it did in turbot and sea bream. Theincreased peroxidation stress in halibut mayaccount for their poorer growth and survival incomparison to turbot and especially sea bream.Halibut were reared at a lower temperature,although relatively high for halibut, thaneither turbot or sea bream but they were alsoslightly younger/smaller fish and possibly,therefore, more developmentally immature, andeither or all of these factors may be importantin the lack of response of the liver enzymes inhalibut.
Keywords:agr-tocopherol" target="_blank">gif" alt="agr" align="BASELINE" BORDER="0">-tocopherol  Antioxidant defence enzymes  Hippoglossus hippoglossus  Lipid peroxidation  Oxidised oil  Vitamin E  Scophthalmus maximus  Sparus aurata
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号