首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同轮作模式对太湖地区大棚菜地土壤氮淋失的影响
引用本文:陆扣萍,闵炬,施卫明,王海龙.不同轮作模式对太湖地区大棚菜地土壤氮淋失的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(3):689-697.
作者姓名:陆扣萍  闵炬  施卫明  王海龙
作者单位:1.浙江农林大学环境与资源学院,浙江临安 311300;
基金项目:公益性行业(农业)科研专项,国家自然科学基金项目,浙江农林大学科研发展基金(人才引进)
摘    要:为控制太湖地区设施菜地氮素淋失,减小地下水污染风险,本研究选取2种轮作模式,即芹菜-番茄-莴苣(模式1)和金花菜-番茄-莴苣(模式2),2种轮作模式下分别设置2个施氮量水平,即习惯施氮(N1)和减量施氮(N2),研究不同轮作模式和施氮水平对设施菜地全年氮素淋洗的影响,并观测了不同轮作模式下土壤硝态氮含量、 电导率和pH的变化。结果表明,与模式1 相比,模式2可分别使N1和N2处理的淋洗液中的 NO-3-N 平均浓度降低了36%和38%,进而使全年总氮淋洗量减少了41% 和38%,但淋洗液体积不变。模式2 结合减量施氮(N2)对设施菜地氮素淋失阻控效果最佳,全年总氮淋失量为63.0 kg/hm2,而年经济效益最高,可达 51.9104 Yuan/hm2,最大经济效益提高29%。一年三季蔬菜收获后,N1处理下模式2的土壤硝态氮含量(020 cm)为189.2 mg/kg,而模式1的高达269.3 mg/kg。因此模式2可分别使N1和N2水平下的土壤硝态氮含量减少30% 和 26%,同时也显著降低了土壤pH和电导率(P<0.05)。在太湖地区,选择需氮量较少的作物进行合理优化轮作(如金花菜-番茄-莴苣轮作模式),是减少设施菜地氮素流失的有效手段,且具有较好的经济效益。

关 键 词:太湖地区    设施菜地    氮淋洗    轮作模式
收稿时间:2012-09-11

Effect of rotation patterns on nitrogen leaching loss from protected vegetable soil in Tai Lake region
LU Kou-ping , MIN Ju , SHI Wei-ming , WANG Hai-long.Effect of rotation patterns on nitrogen leaching loss from protected vegetable soil in Tai Lake region[J].Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science,2013,19(3):689-697.
Authors:LU Kou-ping  MIN Ju  SHI Wei-ming  WANG Hai-long
Institution:1. 1 College of Environmental and Resource Sciences,Zhejiang A & F University,Lin’an,Zhejiang 311300,China; 2 Research Center of Non-point Source Pollution Control,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008,China
Abstract:To control nitrogen (N) leaching loss from protected vegetable production fields and minimize the risk of N pollution of groundwater in the Tai Lake region, China, a field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different rotation patterns and fertilizer application rates on nitrogen leaching loss using lysimeters. Soil NO-3-N concentration, electrical conductivity and pH values were also analyzed. There were two types of rotation patterns, pattern 1 (celery-tomato-lettuce) and pattern 2 (burclover-tomato-lettuce), and two N levels, the conventional N application rate (N1) and reduced N application rate (N2). Comparison with the rotation pattern 1, the averageNO-3-N concentrations in the leachate of the rotation pattern 2 are decreased by 36% (N1) and 38% (N2), and the total N leaching under the two N treatments decreased by 41% and 38% respectively, although the leachate volumes are not affected by the rotation pattern or N application rates. The optimum way to control the N leaching loss is a combination of the rotation pattern 2 and the reduced N application rate (N2). For example, the total annual N leaching loss is 63.0 kg/ha under the combined treatment, and an economic return (up to 519 thousand Yuan/ha) is achieved, which is an increase of 29%. After growing three vegetable crops in a year, soilNO-3-N concentration in the topsoil (0-20 cm) is 189.2 mg/kg in the N1/rotation pattern 2 combination, whereas it is 269.3 mg/kg in the N1/rotation pattern 1 combination. In addition, the rotation pattern 2 reduces soilNO-3-N content by 30% (N1) and 26% (N2) respectively, and soil pH and electrical conductivity are reduced significantly (P<0.05). In the Tai Lake region, rotation patterns requiring less N input (e.g., bur clover-tomato-lettuce) could be practiced to reduce N leaching loss and achieve greater economic return.
Keywords:Taihu Lake region  protected vegetable production  nitrogen leaching  rotation pattern
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《植物营养与肥料学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《植物营养与肥料学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号