首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同密度杉木幼林系统生产力和生态效益研究
引用本文:方奇.不同密度杉木幼林系统生产力和生态效益研究[J].林业科学,2000,36(Z1):28-35.
作者姓名:方奇
作者单位:中国林业科学研究院林业研究所!北京100091
摘    要:杉木幼林系统是由4个不同密度级处理系列小区组成,栽植密度为1665、3330、4995和6660株/hm^2(以下分别用A、B、C和D代替)。这些小区土壤质地及地形别无二致,都是用1年生实生苗1987年春天定植。8年生时调查了这些幼林系统林木生长、冠层厚度、枝下高以及生态效益等。随着密度由A增加到D:平均胸径生长量从8.1cm降到6.6cm;平均树高生长量由5.9m降至5.4m;平均冠层厚度自4.

关 键 词:密度级  生态效益  经济效益  生产力  杉木幼林系统
修稿时间:1998-08-25

STUDY ON PRODUCTIVITY AND ECOLOGIC BENEFITS OF YOUNG GROWTH CHINESE FIR PLANTATIONS SYSTEMS IN DIFFERENT DENSITIES
Fang Qi.STUDY ON PRODUCTIVITY AND ECOLOGIC BENEFITS OF YOUNG GROWTH CHINESE FIR PLANTATIONS SYSTEMS IN DIFFERENT DENSITIES[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2000,36(Z1):28-35.
Authors:Fang Qi
Abstract:Chinese fir \%Cunninghamia lanceolata\%(Lamb.)Hook.]plantation systems were a series experiment plots consisted of four density treatments: 1665trees/hm\ 2, 3330trees/hm\ 2,4995trees/hm\ 2 and 6660 trees/hm\ 2 (four densities levels are taken place by A,B,C and D).There were not differences in the soil texture and topography of the experimental plots. 1-year-old Chinese fir seedlings were planted in spring of 1987. Tree growth, canopy thickness, tree height under first branch, and ecological benefit of different plantation systems were investigated at 8-year-old of Chinese fir trees. The average DBH increment decreased from 8.1?cm to 6.6?cm with the increase of plantation density from A to D, at the same time the average tree height increment decreased from 5\^9?m to 5\^4?m, the canopy thickness thined from 4.9?m to 3.3?m, the average tree height under first branch raised from 1.0?m to 2.3?m. The productivities of different density systems were 4.6, 7.3, 9.5, 10.3 t/hm\ 2\5a from A to D respectively. The systimatic runoff coefficient, liguid runoff, and solid runoff in the A density region were 1.35%, 19.4 mm/hm\ 2\5a, and 334?kg/hm\ 2\5a respectively, and those in the B density region were 0.52%, 8.1?mm/hm\ 2\5a, and 138?kg/hm\ 2\5a respectively, in the C density region were 0\^69?%, 8\^9?mm/hm\ 2\5a, 196?kg/hm\ 2\5a respectively, and 0.75%, 11.8?mm/hm\ 2\5a, 284?kg/hm\ 2\5a in the D density region respectively. The ecological benefits of B and C density region were better than others. The comprehensive evaluation results based on 5 intems including 15 category values showed that in the score of C density was 50, the score of B density was 43. The score of A density was 36, that of A density was 21.
Keywords:Density level  Ecologic benefit  Liquid runoff  Solid runoff  Economic benefit  Productivity
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号