首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于AHP法的郑州城市公园康养景观评价
引用本文:杨芳绒,张晨曦,鲁黎明.基于AHP法的郑州城市公园康养景观评价[J].西北林学院学报,2022,37(1):247-252.
作者姓名:杨芳绒  张晨曦  鲁黎明
作者单位:(河南农业大学 风景园林与艺术学院,河南 郑州 450002)
基金项目:河南省科技智库立项(HNKJZK-2020-01C)。
摘    要:以郑州市人民公园为对象,应用层次分析法,通过6个准则层因素和30个指标层因素来研究影响城市公园康养景观的重要景观因素。结果表明:1)准则层的权重由大到小排序为:安全性B1(0.355 0)、健康性B2(0.232 0)、生态性B5(0.150 3)、人文关怀B6(0.133 6)、便捷性B4(0.082 8)、舒适性B3(0.046 4);2)指标层的重要性程度中最高值和最低值分别为:B1的空间布局的安全性(0.359 2)、植物品种的安全性(0.061 5),B2的疾病预防(0.448 1)、增强体力(0.072 2),B3的空间尺度的舒适性(0.333 7)、色彩的舒适性(0.030 2),B4的空间的可达性(0.473 2)、交通的合理性(0.122 0),B5的景观多样性(0.479 6)、物种多样性(0.115 0),B6的无障碍设施的人性化(0.481 3)、标识系统的人性化(0.097 9);3)人民公园的综合评分为3.689 7,评级为“良”。该研究为今后科学系统地进行城市公园康养景观评价提供参考依据。

关 键 词:康养景观  城市公园  景观评价  郑州市  人民公园  层次分析法

Healthy Landscape Evaluation of Urban Parks in Zhengzhou City Based on AHP
YANG Fang-rong,ZHANG Chen-xi,LU Li-ming.Healthy Landscape Evaluation of Urban Parks in Zhengzhou City Based on AHP[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2022,37(1):247-252.
Authors:YANG Fang-rong  ZHANG Chen-xi  LU Li-ming
Institution:(College of Landscape Architecture and Art,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450002,Henan,China)
Abstract:Taking Zhengzhou People's Park as an example,this paper studied the important landscape factors affecting the Healthy Landscape of the park through six criterion layer factors and thirty indicator layer factors by using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP).The results showed that 1)weight ranking of the criterion layer was safety B1(0.3550),health B2(0.2320),ecology B5(0.1503),humanistic care B6(0.1336),convenience B4(0.0828),comfort B3(0.0464).2)The highest and lowest importance evaluation indicators of each indicator layer were B1:security of spatial layout(0.3592),safety of plant varieties(0.0615);B2:(rehabilitation)disease prevention(0.4481),strength building(0.0722);B3:comfort of spatial scale(0.3337),comfort of color(0.0302);B4:accessibility of space(0.4732),rationality of traffic(0.1220);B5:landscape diversity(0.4796),species diversity(0.1150);B6:humanization of accessibility(0.4813),humanization of identification system(0.0979).3)The comprehensive score of the People's Park was 3.6897,which indicated that the effect of healthy landscape was better.This study provides a reference for the scientific and systematic evaluation of Urban Park healthy landscape in the future.
Keywords:healthy landscape  urban park  landscape evaluation  Zhengzhou City  People's Park  AHP
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《西北林学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西北林学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号