首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

焦化场地PAHs污染土壤的电动-化学氧化联合修复
引用本文:张海欧,郭书海,李凤梅,吴波. 焦化场地PAHs污染土壤的电动-化学氧化联合修复[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(10): 1904-1911
作者姓名:张海欧  郭书海  李凤梅  吴波
作者单位:1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳 110016; 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
2. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳,110016
基金项目:国家高技术研究发展计划(863)(2013AA06A210);辽宁省“百千万人才工程”
摘    要:焦化场地土壤多环芳烃(PAHs)污染严重,目前的修复技术都存在不同程度的弊端。通过研究化学氧化、电动及其联合技术对焦化场地高浓度多环芳烃污染土壤的修复效果,比较了两种技术组合方式对修复效果的影响。结果表明,单一技术及联合技术对焦化场地PAHs均有一定的去除效果。在单一技术处理中,电动处理、芬顿和活化过硫酸钠对多环芳烃的去除率分别为24.86%、10.27%和22.19%;在联合技术处理中,活化过硫酸钠-电动组合、电动-活化过硫酸钠组合、芬顿-电动组合和电动-芬顿组合对多环芳烃的去除率分别为49.65%、41.73%、36.72%和31.39%。电动-化学氧化联合技术对PAHs的去除效果较单一技术提高了6.53%~27.46%。两种技术的组合方式及氧化剂类型均对联合处理效果产生影响,化学氧化-电动处理的多环芳烃去除率较电动-化学氧化处理高5.33%~7.92%,其差异主要由化学氧化去除率差异所引起;应用活化过硫酸钠试剂的组合对多环芳烃的去除率高出应用芬顿试剂的组合12.93%~10.34%。经联合处理后,污染物的残留量及毒性当量浓度均有不同程度降低,说明电动-化学氧化联合技术是一种有效的预处理方法。

关 键 词:焦化土壤  多环芳烃  电动修复  化学氧化  联合处理
收稿时间:2014-03-05

Remediation of PAHs Contaminated Soil at Coking Site by Integrated Electrokinetics and Chemical Oxidation
ZHANG Hai-ou,GUO Shu-hai,LI Feng-mei and WU Bo. Remediation of PAHs Contaminated Soil at Coking Site by Integrated Electrokinetics and Chemical Oxidation[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.), 2014, 33(10): 1904-1911
Authors:ZHANG Hai-ou  GUO Shu-hai  LI Feng-mei  WU Bo
Affiliation:Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Abstract:Soils at coking sites have been heavily contaminated with PAHs. Currently there is lack of effective remediation techniques for PAHs-contaminated soils. In this study, the efficiencies of chemical oxidation and electrokinetics and their integration for remediating PAHs heavily contaminated soils from coking sites were evaluated in a laboratory-scale experiment. Removal rates of PAHs were 24.86%, 10.27% and 22.19%, respectively, in treatments of electrokinetics, Fenton and activated persulfate. However, higher removal rates of PAHs were achieved for activated persulfate-electrokinetics, electrokinetics-activated persulfate, Fenton-electrokinetics and electrokinetics-Fenton, which were 49.65%, 41.73%, 36.72% and 31.39%, respectively. Integrating electrokinetics and chemical oxidation further enhanced the removal rate of PAHs by 6.53%~27.46% compared to electrokinetics or chemical oxidation alone. The sequence of applying electrokinetics and chemical oxidants and oxidant types impacted on the PAHs removal efficiency. Chemical oxidation- electrokinetics removed 5.33%~7.92% more PAHs than electrokinetics-chemical oxidation did. Applying activated persulfate increased PAHs removal by 12.93% ~10.34% compared to using Fenton. These results show that integration of electrokinetics and chemical oxidation could be a promising pre-treatment technique to remove the PAHs in highly contaminated soils efficiently and to alleviate the residual toxicity.
Keywords:coking site soil  PAHs  electrokinetics  chemical oxidation  combined remediation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号