首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

最优权重组合模型和高光谱估算苹果叶片全磷含量
引用本文:冯海宽,杨福芹,李振海,杨贵军,郭建华,贺鹏,王衍安.最优权重组合模型和高光谱估算苹果叶片全磷含量[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(7):173-180.
作者姓名:冯海宽  杨福芹  李振海  杨贵军  郭建华  贺鹏  王衍安
作者单位:1. 北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 农业部农业信息技术重点实验室,北京 100097; 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097;2. 北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 农业部农业信息技术重点实验室,北京 100097; 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 河南工程学院土木工程学院,郑州 451191;3. 山东农业大学生命科学学院,泰安,271018
基金项目:国家高技术研究发展计划863课题(2011AA100703)。
摘    要:为了估算苹果叶片全磷含量,该文使用2012年和2013年在山东省肥城市潮泉镇下寨村的2个苹果示范园获取的整个生育期苹果叶片全磷含量和对应的叶片光谱数据,建立了预测苹果叶片全磷含量的最优权重组合模型。首先分析了苹果叶片全磷含量和原始光谱的相关关系,确定了以553和722 nm为苹果叶片全磷含量的诊断波段;根据叶片全磷含量与400~2 500 nm范围两两组合的决定系数等值线图,确立了对苹果叶片全磷含量敏感的546和521 nm、553和518 nm组合的归一化差值指数和543和525 nm、1 394和718 nm组合的比值指数;最后以553和722 nm的反射率以及546和521 nm、553和518 nm组合的归一化差值指数和543和525 nm、1 394和718 nm组合的比值指数为自变量,构建了基于苹果叶片全磷含量的最优权重组合模型,实现了对苹果叶片全磷含量的高光谱估算。结果表明,最优权重组合模型无论是建模集还是验证集,其预测能力(R2=0.94)要优于该文中的6种统计方法(平均R2=0.82),研究结果为快速无损诊断苹果叶片的磷素状况提供新的技术途径。

关 键 词:光谱分析    模型  苹果叶片  最优权重  RBF神经网络
收稿时间:2015/11/26 0:00:00
修稿时间:2/4/2016 12:00:00 AM

Hyperspectral estimation of leaf total phosphorus content in apple tree based on optimal weights combination model
Feng Haikuan,Yang Fuqin,Li Zhenhai,Yang Guijun,Guo Jianhu,He Peng and Wang Yan''an.Hyperspectral estimation of leaf total phosphorus content in apple tree based on optimal weights combination model[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(7):173-180.
Authors:Feng Haikuan  Yang Fuqin  Li Zhenhai  Yang Guijun  Guo Jianhu  He Peng and Wang Yan'an
Institution:1. Beijing Research Center for Information Technology In Agriculture, Beijing,100097, China2. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China3. Key Laboratory for Information Technologies in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, 100097, China4.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China,1. Beijing Research Center for Information Technology In Agriculture, Beijing,100097, China2. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China3. Key Laboratory for Information Technologies in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, 100097, China4.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China5. College of Civil Engineering, Henan Institute of Engineering, Zhengzhou 451191, China,1. Beijing Research Center for Information Technology In Agriculture, Beijing,100097, China2. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China3. Key Laboratory for Information Technologies in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, 100097, China4.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China,1. Beijing Research Center for Information Technology In Agriculture, Beijing,100097, China2. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China3. Key Laboratory for Information Technologies in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, 100097, China4.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China,1. Beijing Research Center for Information Technology In Agriculture, Beijing,100097, China2. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China3. Key Laboratory for Information Technologies in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, 100097, China4.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China,1. Beijing Research Center for Information Technology In Agriculture, Beijing,100097, China2. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China3. Key Laboratory for Information Technologies in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, 100097, China4.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China and 6. College of Life Science,Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China
Abstract:Abstract: The phosphorus status is an important parameter for evaluating the growth status and predicting the production in apple trees. The objective of the study was to demonstrate the feasibility of remote sensing monitoring the apple leaf total phosphorus content and its expansibility in regional and annual level. Spectral reflectance of leaves and concurrent apple leaf phosphorus content parameters of samples were acquired in Xiazhai Village, Chaoquan District, Feicheng City, Shandong Province, China during the apple growth season from 2012 to 2013, and the optimal weight combination model was built using the Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network. Leaf spectra and total phosphorus content of apples were measured at the fast-growing period of shoot, the time of blooming of vernal treetop, the fruit expansion period, the fruit maturity stage, and the color changing stage in the leaves. The paper was based on the apple whole stage. The leaf reflectance was measured and then the normalized difference spectral index (NDSI) and ratio spectral index (RSI) that were sensitive to total phosphorus content were built; the optimal weight combination model of the RBF was discussed and the hyperspectral estimation model for total phosphorus content in apple leaves was established. Firstly, We analyzed the correlation between the phosphorus content and the original spectrum, determined R553 and R722 as the diagnostic band of leaf phosphorus content, and constructed the estimation model of total phosphorus content. The coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and relative error (RE) were 0.69, 0.07 g/(100g), 0.2% and 0.80, 0.06 g/(100g), 0.2%, respectively; the NDSI and RSI was constructed referred to normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and ratio vegetation index (RVI). The sensitivity of hyperspectral vegetation indices NDSI(546, 521), NDSI(553, 518), RSI(543, 525) and RSI(1394, 718) to phosphorus content was determined by the contour map of combination range (400-2500 nm) with the leaf total phosphorus content. The estimated model was built based on the empirical statistical relationships between NDSI(546, 521), NDSI(553, 518), RSI(543, 525), RSI(1394, 718) and total phosphorus content, and the corresponding R2, RMSE and RE were 0.87, 0.05 g/(100g) and 0.3%, 0.86, 0.05 g/(100g) and 0.05%, 0.87, 0.05 g/(100g) and 0.2%, and 0.85, 0.05 g/(100g) and 0.2%, respectively. Lastly, the optimal weight combination model of RBF neural network was constructed; the goal and spread were calculated by iteration until the min (et) was minimal. The R553, R722, NDSI(546, 521), NDSI(553, 518), RSI(543, 525) and RSI(1394, 718) were considered as independent variables and the total phosphorus content was taken as dependent variable in the combination model. Gaussian function was used as radial basis function, which could get the optimal weight for every independent variable. The results indicated that the prediction of the optimal weight combination model of RBF neural network had a higher precision, compared to the mean of the 6 estimated models (traditional empirical statistical models), the R2 was increased from 0.82 to 0.94, and the RMSE was decreased from 0.06 to 0.05 g/(100g). The validation results also indicated that the estimation accuracy of the optimal weight combination model (R2=0.55 and RMSE=0.05 g/(100 g)) was higher than the empirical statistical relations (R2=0.38 and RMSE= 0.06 g/(100g)). The optimal weight combination model of RBF is a new technical method which can provide a rapid and nondestructive diagnosis of the phosphorus status of apple leaves.
Keywords:spectrum analysis  phosphorus  models  apple leaves  optimal weight  RBF neural network
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号