Water requirements of maize in the middle Heihe River basin, China

As part of an intercomparison study on crop evapotranspiration (ET_c), six methods for estimating ET_c have been applied to maize field in the middle Heihe River basin, China. The ET_c was estimated by the soil water balance and Bowen ratio-energy balance methods while the Priestley-Taylor, Penman, Penman-Monteith and Hargreaves methods were used for estimating the reference evapotranspiration (ET₀). The results showed that the trend of ET_c was very similar, while the differences were significant among the different methods. The variations of ET_c were closely related to the LAI as well as to the meteorological features. The ET_c for the Bowen ratio-energy balance, Penman, Penman-Monteith, soil water balance, Priestley-Taylor and Hargreaves methods totaled 777.75, 693.13, 618.34, 615.67, 560.31 and 552.07 mm, respectively, with the daily mean values for 5.26, 4.68, 4.18, 4.16, 3.79 and 3.73 mm day⁻¹. The Penman-Monteith method provided fairly good estimation of ET_o as compared with the Priestley-Taylor, Penman, Hargreaves methods. By contrast with the Penman-Monteith method, the Bowen ratio-energy balance and Penman methods were 25.8% and 12.0% higher, while the Priestley-Taylor and Hargreaves methods were 9.4% and 10.7% lower, respectively. Therefore, the Hargreaves and Priestley-Taylor methods were the alternative ET_c methods in arid regions of Northwest China.