首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

硝化抑制剂施用对水稻产量与氨挥发的影响
引用本文:孙海军,闵 炬,施卫明,冯彦房,李卫正,初 磊.硝化抑制剂施用对水稻产量与氨挥发的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(6):1027-1033.
作者姓名:孙海军  闵 炬  施卫明  冯彦房  李卫正  初 磊
作者单位:南京林业大学 现代分析测试中心,中国科学院南京土壤研究所 土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室,南京林业大学 现代分析测试中心,南京林业大学 林学院,中国科学院南京土壤研究所 土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室
基金项目:本研究得到土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室开放(Y412201425),国家青年科学基金项目(31201686),江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目(CX(14)2050)的资助。*通讯作者:施卫明,研究员,E-mailwmshi@issas.ac.cn。
摘    要:通过田间微区试验,应用~(15)N标记技术研究两个施氮水平下硝化抑制剂CP施用对水稻产量、氮素利用率、氮素土壤残留和氨挥发的影响。结果表明:与推荐施氮处理(240 kg/hm~2)相比,减氮处理(180 kg/hm~2)水稻产量明显降低,但是减氮处理下施用硝化抑制剂CP后增产15.2%,差异显著,并且达到了推荐施氮处理下的产量水平。而推荐施氮处理下施用硝化抑制剂对水稻产量反而没有显著影响。施用硝化抑制剂可显著提高11.1%~25.0%的~(15)N吸收与利用效率,同时~(15)N平衡计算结果表明稻田施用硝化抑制剂减少了21.7%~28.1%的硝化?反硝化、径流等途径~(15)N损失,这可能是CP施用增加水稻产量的机理之一。然而,施用硝化抑制剂会增加54.7%~110.6%的氨挥发排放。因此,在水稻生产过程中施用硝化抑制剂CP时要进一步减施氮肥才有明显的增产效果,同时还需要采取一定的措施来控制氨挥发。

关 键 词:硝化抑制剂  水稻  氨挥发  氮肥
收稿时间:2015/6/24 0:00:00
修稿时间:2015/7/11 0:00:00

Effects of Nitrification Inhibitor on Rice Production and Ammonia Volatilization in Paddy Rice Field
SUN Hai-jun,MIN Ju,SHI Wei-ming,FENG Yan-fang,LI Wei-zheng and CHU Lei.Effects of Nitrification Inhibitor on Rice Production and Ammonia Volatilization in Paddy Rice Field[J].Soils,2015,47(6):1027-1033.
Authors:SUN Hai-jun  MIN Ju  SHI Wei-ming  FENG Yan-fang  LI Wei-zheng and CHU Lei
Institution:Advanced Analysis and Testing Center, Nanjing Forestry University,State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Advanced Analysis and Testing Center,Nanjing Forestry University,College of Forestry,Nanjing Forestry University,State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences
Abstract:A micro-plot scale field experiment with two labeled 15N-urea input level, i.e., 180 kg/hm2 and 240 kg/hm2, was carried out to study the effects of nitrification inhibitor (2-Chloro-6-(trichloromethyl)-pyridine, CP) application on rice grain yield, N use efficiency, soil residual N and NH3 volatilization in a paddy rice field. The results showed that the rice production of N180 was significantly lower than N240. For the plots received 180 kg/hm2urea N, CP application increased the rice grain yield by 15.2% that reached to the rice production in plots received 240 kg/hm2. However, CP had no impact on rice yield when the N input level came to 240 kg/hm2. CP application significantly promoted the 15N use efficiency by 11.1~25.0%. And the 15N balance results suggested that CP usage reduced the 15N losses via nitrification-denitrification and runoff by 21.7~28.1%. These probably were the mechanisms of rice yield-increasing. However, CP amendment increased the NH3 losses by 54.7~110.6%. These results indicated that CP application can maintain a high rice production at a sub-optimal N input level. However, the counter measures should be adopted to control the much higher NH3 volatilization in paddy soil applied with CP.
Keywords:nitrification inhibitor  rice  ammonia volatilization  nitrogen fertilizer
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《土壤》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土壤》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号