桑椹红色素不同测定方法的比较研究 |
| |
引用本文: | 唐迪,朱毛毛,赵婷,张敏,顾晓云,仰榴青. 桑椹红色素不同测定方法的比较研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(9): 5207-5208,5531 |
| |
作者姓名: | 唐迪 朱毛毛 赵婷 张敏 顾晓云 仰榴青 |
| |
作者单位: | 江苏农林职业技术学院,江苏镇江,212400;江苏大学食品与生物工程学院,江苏镇江,212013;江苏大学化学化工学院,江苏镇江,212013 |
| |
摘 要: | [目的]研究和比较桑椹红色素的不同定量分析方法。[方法]以酸性乙醇溶液提取桑椹红色素,并用大孔树脂对其进行初步纯化。分别利用色价法、消光系数法、pH示差法和NaNO2-Al(NO3)3比色法测定桑椹花青素的含量。[结果]纯化后色素的色价是纯化前的14.8倍;消光系数法测得桑椹红色素中花青素含量为0.015%;pH示差法测得其含量为0.017%;比色法测得含量为0.007 6%。[结论]pH示差法测定桑椹花青素含量较为准确。
|
关 键 词: | 桑椹红色素 提取纯化 定量分析 |
Comparative Study on the Different Quantitative Analysis of Mulberry Red Pigment |
| |
Affiliation: | TANG Di et al(Jiangsu Polytechnic College of Agriculture and Forestry,Zhenjiang,Jiangsu 212400) |
| |
Abstract: | [Objective] The aim was to study the quantitative analysis of mulberry red pigment.[Method] Mulberry red pigment was extracted by using acid alcohol and macroreticular resin was purified.The pigment content was analyzed by color value method,extinction coefficient method,pH differential method and NaNO2-Al(NO3)3 method,respectively.[Result] The purified pigment was 14.8 times the color value of unpurified one.The mulberry red pigment content measured by extinction coefficient method was 0.015%.The one measured by pH differential method was 0.017%.The one measured by NaNO2-Al(NO3)3 method was 0.007 6%.[Conclusion] pH differential method was more accurate for the quantitative analysis of mulberry anthocyanins. |
| |
Keywords: | Mulberry red pigment Extraction and purification Quantitative analysis |
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|