首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同土壤管理措施下基于水蚀过程的含沙量变异及其驱动
作者姓名:ZHANG Wen-Tai  YU Dong-Sheng  SHI Xue-Zheng  TAN Man-Zhi  LIU Liu-Song
作者单位:ZHANG Wen-Tai,SHI Xue-Zheng,LIU Liu-Song(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008,China;Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China);YU Dong-Sheng(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008,China;College of Geography Sciences,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210046,China;Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of);TAN Man-Zhi(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008,China) 
基金项目:the National Basic Research Program of China,the National Natural Science Foundation of China,the Frontier Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences 
摘    要:In order to prevent soil erosion in southern China, a study was performed to determine the drivers of sediment concentration variation using simulated rainfall and four soil management systems under field condition. Four soil management systems, i. e., forest and grass coverage (FG), forest coverage with disturbed soil surface (FD), contour tillage (CT) and downslope tillage (DT), were exposed to two rainfall intensities (40 and 54 mm h-1) using a portable rainfall simulator. The drivers of sediment concentration variation were determined by the variations of runoff rate and sediment concentration as well as their relationships. The effects of the four soil management systems in preventing water and soil losses were compared using runoff rates and sediment concentrations at steady state. At runoff initial stage, sediment concentration variation was mainly driven by rainfall and management. The degree of sediment concentration variation driven by flow varied with different soil management systems. Three best relationships between runoff rate and sediment concentration were identified, i. e., reciprocal (CT), quadratic (FG and FD) and exponential (DT). At steady state, runoff rates of the four soil management systems varied slightly, whereas their sediment concentrations varied greatly. FG and CT were recommended as the best soil management systems for preventing water and soil losses.

关 键 词:runoff  rate    runoff  steady  state    simulated  rainfall    soil  erosion
收稿时间:28 April 2010

Variation of sediment concentration and its drivers under different soil management systems
ZHANG Wen-Tai,YU Dong-Sheng,SHI Xue-Zheng,TAN Man-Zhi,LIU Liu-Song.Variation of sediment concentration and its drivers under different soil management systems[J].Pedosphere,2010,20(5):578-585.
Authors:ZHANG Wen-Tai  YU Dong-Sheng  SHI Xue-Zheng  TAN Man-Zhi and LIU Liu-Song
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008 (China) ;Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 (China);State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008 (China) ;College of Geography Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046 (China); Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 (China);;State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008 (China); Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 (China);State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008 (China);State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008 (China); Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 (China)
Abstract:In order to prevent soil erosion in southern China, a study was performed to determine the drivers of sediment concentration variation using simulated rainfall and four soil management systems under field condition. Four soil management systems, i.e., forest and grass coverage (FG), forest coverage with disturbed soil surface (FD), contour tillage (CT) and downslope tillage (DT), were exposed to two rainfall intensities (40 and 54 mm h-1) using a portable rainfall simulator. The drivers of sediment concentration variation were detected by process-based variations of runoff rate and sediment concentration as well as their relationships. The effects of the four soil management systems in preventing water and soil losses were compared using runoff rates and sediment concentrations at steady state. At runoff initial stage, sediment concentration variation was mainly driven by rainfall and management. The degree of sediment concentration variation driven by flow varied with different soil management systems. Three best relationships between runoff rate and sediment concentration were identified, i.e., reciprocal (CT), quadratic (FG and FD) and exponential (DT). At steady state, runoff rates of the four soil management systems varied slightly, whereas their sediment concentrations varied greatly. FG and CT were recommended as the best soil management systems for preventing water and soil losses.
Keywords:runoff rate  runoff steady state  simulated rainfall  soil erosion
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《土壤圈》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土壤圈》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号