首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

半湿润偏旱区沟垄覆盖种植对冬小麦产量及水分利用效率的影响
引用本文:韩娟,廖允成,贾志宽,韩清芳,丁瑞霞.半湿润偏旱区沟垄覆盖种植对冬小麦产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].作物学报,2014,40(1):101-109.
作者姓名:韩娟  廖允成  贾志宽  韩清芳  丁瑞霞
作者单位:1.西北农林科技大学中国旱区节水农业研究院, 陕西杨凌 712100;2农业部黄土高原作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室 / 西北农林科技大学农学院, 陕西杨凌 712100
基金项目:本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD09B03, 2011BAD29B09), 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2011AA100504)和陕西科技创新项目(2011NXC01-16)资助。
摘    要:为探索半湿润偏旱区沟垄集雨种植模式下冬小麦田土壤蓄水保墒和节水增产效果, 于2007-2010年连续3个小麦生长季在渭北旱塬旱农试验站, 研究了不同沟垄集雨种植模式对土壤水分、冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响。设置3个沟垄集雨处理, 分别是垄上覆盖地膜+沟内不覆盖(P1)、沟内覆盖小麦秸秆(P2)、沟内覆盖液体地膜(P3)处理, 以传统平作(CK)为对照。P1、P2和P3处理显著提高冬小麦生育前期0~20 cm和20~100 cm的土壤贮水量, 其中以P2处理蓄水保墒效果最显著, P3处理由于液态地膜的降解, 仅在小麦生长前期有一定的蓄水保墒作用, 在小麦的生长后期与P1处理无显著差异;各沟垄集雨处理100~200 cm土壤贮水量与CK无差异。P2处理对冬小麦平均株高和生物量影响最大, 3年平均株高和生物量分别较对照提高26.7%和60.3%。以P2处理增产效果最显著, 3年平均产量和水分利用效率分别较CK对照提高39.3%和35.6%;且P1和P3之间无显著差异。因此, 垄覆地膜、沟覆秸秆的二元沟垄集雨覆盖种植模式能显著提高冬小麦产量和水分利用效率, 适宜在半湿润偏旱区冬小麦生产中应用。

关 键 词:旱作小麦  节水栽培  产量  水分利用效率  
收稿时间:2013-03-26

Effects of Ridging with Mulching on Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat in Semihumid Drought-Prone Region in China
HAN Juan,LIAO Yun-Cheng,JIA Zhi-Kuan,HAN Qing-Fang,DING Rui-Xia.Effects of Ridging with Mulching on Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat in Semihumid Drought-Prone Region in China[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica,2014,40(1):101-109.
Authors:HAN Juan  LIAO Yun-Cheng  JIA Zhi-Kuan  HAN Qing-Fang  DING Rui-Xia
Institution:1.Chinese Institute of Water-Saving Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China;2.Key Laboratory of Crop Physi-ecology and Tillage Science in Northwestern loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture / College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
Abstract:The objective of this study was to explore the effects of the ridge and mulch on soil moisture, grain yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) in rainfall winter wheat growing region in Weibei Area. In a three-year field experiment from Sept. 2007 to June 2010, we compared three ridge (for collecting rainfall) and mulch treatments with traditional plat planting as the control (CK). The ridge was covered with common plastic film, and the dent was bare (P1) or covered with either wheat straw (P2) or degradable film (P3). At the early growth stage of winter wheat, soil water storages in 0–20 cm and 20–100 cm layers were significantly higher in all ridge and mulch treatments than in CK, particularly in P2. At late growth stage, the effect of P3 was similar to that of P1 with no significant difference due to the degradation of the film in dent. However, compared to CK, treatments P1, P2, and P3 had no effect on soil water storage in 100–200 cm layer. Plant height and biomass of wheat were the largest in P2, which were 26.68% and 60.28% higher than that of CK, respectively. Moreover, P2 was also the best treatment for grain yield and WUE with 39.29% increased yield and 35.57% increased WUE over CK. Yield and WUE were similar between P3 and P1 with no significant difference. Therefore, P2 is recommended as an efficient planting pattern in semi-humid drought-prone wheat region.
Keywords:Rainfed wheat  Water-saving cultivation  Yield  Water use efficiency
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《作物学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《作物学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号