首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Monitoring predators to optimize their management for marine turtle nest protection
Authors:Richard M Engeman  R Erik Martin  Ryan Noel  John Woolard
Institution:
  • a National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521-2154, USA
  • b Ecological Associates, Inc., PO Box 405, Jensen Beach, FL 34958, USA
  • c USDA/APHIS/WS, 2820 East University Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32641, USA
  • d Hobe Sound NWR, 13640 S.E. Federal Hwy, Hobe Sound, FL 33455, USA
  • Abstract:The fundamental conservation focus for Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge (HSNWR), Florida is to provide protected nesting habitat for three threatened or endangered marine turtle species. Turtle nesting and hatching spans from early spring to fall each year. Left unchecked, nest predation by raccoons and armadillos would destroy most turtle nests. Predators are removed to protect nests, primarily with a one person-month contract using control specialists. We maximized the efficiency of predator removal by using a passive tracking index to: (1) optimize the timing and strategy for predator removal, (2) minimize labor by identifying areas where predator removal would have maximal effect, (3) examine beach invasion patterns of predators, (4) assess efficacy of removal efforts, (5) provide anticipatory information for future turtle nesting seasons, and (6) serve as a detection method for invasion by additional species known to depredate turtle nests. An overall nest predation rate of 28% resulted, whereas the rate for the previous year was 42% when the same level of contracted predator removal was applied, but without monitoring predators. One year before that, predator removal was done without contracts with specialists and predation was 48%. Up to 95% of the nests were destroyed in the years prior to predator removal. Using 2000 data on numbers of nests, clutch sizes, and emergence rates, we estimated the number of hatchlings that would have been lost assuming that the predation rates observed from four predator removal scenarios at HSNWR would have occurred in 2000. Historical predation of 95% would have resulted in 120,597 hatchlings lost in 2000. Predator removal as part of regular refuge operations would have reduced this number to 62,481. Addition of a contract with control specialists would have further reduced the number lost to 53,778. Addition of temporal and spatial monitoring for predator removal reduced losses to 36,637.
    Keywords:Armadillo  Florida  Leatherback turtle  Loggerhead turtle  Green turtle  Population index  Raccoon
    本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
    设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

    Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号