首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

农产品水足迹评价研究进展
引用本文:高凡,李玉中,郭家选,梅旭荣,王敬贤,藏淼.农产品水足迹评价研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(7):1071-1080.
作者姓名:高凡  李玉中  郭家选  梅旭荣  王敬贤  藏淼
作者单位:1. 农业应用新技术北京市重点实验室/北京农学院资源与环境系 北京 102206;北京林果业生态环境功能提升协同创新中心 北京 102206;2. 农业部旱作节水农业重点实验室/中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所 北京 100081;3. 农业应用新技术北京市重点实验室/北京农学院资源与环境系 北京 102206
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31471837, 41473004)、科技创新服务能力建设-协同创新中心-林果业生态环境功能提升协同创新中心(2011协同创新中心)(市级)(PXM2017_014207_000043)资助
摘    要:水足迹是消费者或生产者直接或间接使用水资源量的衡量指标,并被广泛应用于全球或区域虚拟水贸易分析研究。本文从全球、国家或地区等不同空间尺度对农产品水足迹评价研究进行了比较全面的综述。近十几年来,农产品水足迹研究从2008年以前的全球农产品贸易虚拟水量分析评价为主,转向2009年以后国家或地区空间尺度的农产品形成过程中所消耗的直接和间接水量的详细核算研究为核心。水足迹评价具有明显的空间分布特征,为了获取准确、全面客观的农产品生产水足迹信息,必须要考虑区域地理特征、土壤理化特性、气候变化、生产技术及污染物生态毒性等因素的影响。水资源管理决策制定时应综合考虑农产品绿水、蓝水和灰水足迹,因为农产品的蓝水足迹表征了社会淡水资源的直接消耗,对国际市场贸易决策制定具有重要意义,而农产品灰水足迹评价则更明确地反映了农业生产对环境的影响程度。实现全球或区域农业水资源保护与可持续利用,不仅要提高农业生产水资源利用效率,还应该调整农业生产结构、农产品虚拟水贸易的模式和方向,减少农产品流通过程和饮食消费的水资源浪费。

关 键 词:农产品  水足迹  绿水  蓝水  灰水
收稿时间:2017/1/9 0:00:00
修稿时间:2017/2/21 0:00:00

A review of water footprint assessment for agricultural products
GAO Fan,LI Yuzhong,GUO Jiaxuan,MEI Xurong,WANG Jingxian and ZANG Miao.A review of water footprint assessment for agricultural products[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2017,25(7):1071-1080.
Authors:GAO Fan  LI Yuzhong  GUO Jiaxuan  MEI Xurong  WANG Jingxian and ZANG Miao
Institution:Beijing Key Laboratory for Agricultural Application and New Technique/Department of Resources and Environment, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China;Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-environmental Improvement with Forestry and Fruit Trees, Beijing 102206, China,Key Laboratory for Dryland Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China,Beijing Key Laboratory for Agricultural Application and New Technique/Department of Resources and Environment, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China;Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Eco-environmental Improvement with Forestry and Fruit Trees, Beijing 102206, China,Key Laboratory for Dryland Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China,Beijing Key Laboratory for Agricultural Application and New Technique/Department of Resources and Environment, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China and Beijing Key Laboratory for Agricultural Application and New Technique/Department of Resources and Environment, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
Abstract:Water footprint (WF) is an indicator for both direct (domestic water use) and indirect (water required for industrial and agricultural production) water use of a consumer or producer.It has also been widely used in the analysis of global or regional virtual water trade.In the last decade,assessment of WF has been the focus of the footprint of rapid development.WF has three components (green,blue and grey water).This paper discussed a comprehensive review of the assessment of WF for agricultural products at different spatial scales,including global,regional and country scales.The main goal of the assessment of agricultural WF before 2008 was to determine global virtual water trade via agricultural products.However,the goal shifted to the rigorously quantification of three components for specific agricultural products and in specific geographical areas after 2009.As the assessment of WF has obvious spatial distribution characteristics,it was necessary to consider the influence of regional geographical characteristics,soil physical and chemical properties,climate change,as well as production technology and ecological toxicity of pollutants for building accurate,comprehensive and objective information on the WF of agricultural products.It was also necessary to take into account green water,blue water and gray water footprints for agricultural products in decision making on water resources management.This was because blue WF for agricultural products represented the direct consumption of freshwater resources,which was critical in decisions on international water trade market.The grey WF for agricultural products more clearly reflected the effect of agricultural production on the environment.In order to reach global or regional objectives on water resources conservation and sustainable utilization,not only the utilization efficiency of water resources in agricultural production needed improvement,but also the structure of agricultural production and both pattern and direction of virtual water trade for agricultural products needed adjustment.Furthermore,it was necessary to reduce waste of water resources in agricultural product cycle and food consumption.
Keywords:Agricultural product  Water footprint  Green water  Blue water  Grey water
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国生态农业学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国生态农业学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号