首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

农田管理措施对土壤有机碳周转及微生物的影响
引用本文:汪洋,杨殿林,王丽丽,赵建宁,刘红梅,谭炳昌,王慧,王明亮,黄进,张小福.农田管理措施对土壤有机碳周转及微生物的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2020,37(3):340-352.
作者姓名:汪洋  杨殿林  王丽丽  赵建宁  刘红梅  谭炳昌  王慧  王明亮  黄进  张小福
作者单位:农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;农业农村部产地环境污染防控重点实验室/天津市农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室, 天津 300191,农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;农业农村部产地环境污染防控重点实验室/天津市农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室, 天津 300191,农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;农业农村部产地环境污染防控重点实验室/天津市农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室, 天津 300191,农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;农业农村部产地环境污染防控重点实验室/天津市农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室, 天津 300191,农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;农业农村部产地环境污染防控重点实验室/天津市农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室, 天津 300191,农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;农业农村部产地环境污染防控重点实验室/天津市农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室, 天津 300191,农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;农业农村部产地环境污染防控重点实验室/天津市农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室, 天津 300191,农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;天津农学院农学与资源环境学院, 天津 300384,十堰市农业科学院果茶研究所, 湖北 十堰, 442000,十堰市经济作物研究所, 湖北 十堰, 442714
基金项目:国家重点研发计划课题子课题(2016YFD0201009);中国农业科学院科技创新工程协同创新任务(CAAS-XTCX2016015);天津市自然科学基金项目(18JCYBJC23000);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(2018-szjj-wll)
摘    要:农田管理措施对农田生态系统碳循环影响显著,进而制约土壤肥力、农业生产及粮食安全,影响气候变化和环境健康。本文综述了不同农田管理措施(施肥方式、种植制度、耕作模式)对农田土壤有机碳、含碳温室气体排放和土壤微生物的影响。发现有机肥与无机肥配施情景下土壤有机碳增速最快,且施肥量与土壤碳库存在阈值效应;有机肥的施用增加了土壤中CO2排放通量,磷、钾两种肥料的施用与施用氮肥相比更能降低农田土壤排放温室气体产生的全球增温潜势;提高有机肥和磷肥的施用比例有利于土壤中微生物丰富度的提高和微生物量碳的积累。种植结构和种植密度均会影响农田土壤的碳储量,种植结构对农田生态系统温室气体排放影响显著,轮作和间作的种植模式与传统单一作物种植相比可有效减少农田含碳温室气体的排放,同时,轮作与连作相比更有利于土壤微生物多样性的增加。保护性耕作措施有利于农田土壤固碳效率的提高,可降低农田温室气体的排放,且对微生物活性、多样性、群落结构以及碳源利用情况均有积极影响。最后总结了国际主流碳模型在农田生态系统的应用概况,并提出了未来发展展望。

关 键 词:农田管理措施,土壤碳储量,含碳温室气体,土壤微生物,模型
收稿时间:2018/11/21 0:00:00

Effects of farmland management measures on soil organic carbon turnover and microorganisms
WANG Yang,YANG Dian-lin,WANG Li-li,ZHAO Jian-ning,LIU Hong-mei,TAN Bing-chang,WANG Hui,WANG Ming-liang,HUANG Jin and ZHANG Xiao-fu.Effects of farmland management measures on soil organic carbon turnover and microorganisms[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.),2020,37(3):340-352.
Authors:WANG Yang  YANG Dian-lin  WANG Li-li  ZHAO Jian-ning  LIU Hong-mei  TAN Bing-chang  WANG Hui  WANG Ming-liang  HUANG Jin and ZHANG Xiao-fu
Institution:Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Key Laboratory of Origin Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-product Safety, Tianjin 300191, China,Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Key Laboratory of Origin Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-product Safety, Tianjin 300191, China,Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Key Laboratory of Origin Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-product Safety, Tianjin 300191, China,Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Key Laboratory of Origin Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-product Safety, Tianjin 300191, China,Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Key Laboratory of Origin Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-product Safety, Tianjin 300191, China,Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Key Laboratory of Origin Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-product Safety, Tianjin 300191, China,Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Key Laboratory of Origin Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-product Safety, Tianjin 300191, China,Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;College of Agronomy & Resources and Environment, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300384, China,Tea Research Institute, Shiyan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shiyan 442000, China and Economic Crop Research Institute of Shiyan City, Shiyan 442714, China
Abstract:Farmland management measures can have a significant impact on the carbon cycle of farmland ecosystems, which can affect soil fertility, agricultural production, and food security, and more broadly, climate change and environmental health. In this paper, the effects of different farmland management measures(fertilization methods, planting systems, and farming models)on soil organic carbon, greenhouse gas emissions, and soil microorganisms were reviewed. The increase in soil organic carbon was fastest when organic and inorganic fertilizer were applied. Moreover, there was a threshold effect between the amount of fertilizer applied and the soil carbon inventory. The application of organic fertilizer increased the CO2 emissions flux in the soil, and the application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers reduced the globe warming potential of farmland soil more than nitrogen fertilizer. Increasing the application ratio of organic fertilizer to phosphate fertilizer was beneficial, leading to an increase in microbial richness in the soil and accumulation of microbial biomass carbon. Planting structure and planting density both affected the carbon storage of farmland soil, and planting structure had a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions in farmland ecosystems. Compared with traditional monoculture planting, crop rotation and intercropping could effectively reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of farmland. At the same time, crop rotation was more conducive to increasing soil microbial diversity than continuous cropping. Conservation tillage improved the efficiency of farmland soil carbon, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and had a positive impact on microbial activity, diversity, community structure, and carbon source utilization. Finally, we summarized the application of international mainstream carbon models to farmland ecosystems, and present future development prospects.
Keywords:farm management measures  soil carbon reserves  greenhouse gases  edaphon  model
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号