首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A laboratory evaluation to determine the compatibility of microbiological control agents with the pollinator Bombus terrestris
Authors:Veerle Mommaerts  Guido Sterk  Lucien Hoffmann  Guy Smagghe
Institution:1. Laboratory of Cellular Genetics, Department of Biology, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium;2. Biobest NV, Westerlo, Belgium;3. Department of Environment and Agro‐biotechnologies (EVA), Centre de Recherche Public—Gabriel Lippmann, Luxembourg;4. Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Crop Protection, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Abstract:BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to identify any potential adverse side effects of the use of seven microbiological control agents (MCAs) on the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris L., in the context of combined use in integrated pest management (IPM). AQ10® (Ampelomyces quisqualis), Binab‐T‐vector® (Hypocrea parapilulifera + T. atroviride; 1/1), Prestop‐Mix® (Gliocladium catenulatum J1446), Serenade® (Bacillus subtilis QST713), Trianum‐P® (Trichoderma harzianum T22), Botanigard® (Beauveria bassiana GHA) and Granupom® (Cydia pomonella granulovirus), comprising five biofungicides and two bioinsecticides, were investigated. Bumblebee workers were exposed under laboratory conditions to each MCA at its maximum field recommended concentration (MFRC) via three different routes of exposure: dermal contact and orally via either treated sugar water or pollen. RESULTS: The tested MCAs were found to be safe for workers of B. terrestris, with the exception of Botanigard® and Serenade®. Exposure to Botanigard® via contact at its MFRC caused 92% mortality after 11 weeks, while the 1/10 MFRC killed 46% of exposed workers. For Serenade®, topical contact and oral delivery via sugar water resulted in 88 and 100% worker mortality respectively. With lower concentrations (1/2, 1/5 and 1/10 MFRC) the toxicity decreased, but the effect depended on the route of exposure. In addition to lethal effects, nests were also evaluated for sublethal effects after treatment with the seven MCAs at their respective MFRCs over 11 weeks. In these bioassays, only Botanigard® and Serenade® gave rise to a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in drone production. Sublethal effects on foraging behaviour were also evaluated, and only Botanigard at its MFRC delivered via treated sugar water induced negative effects. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that most of the MCAs tested can be considered safe for use in combination with B. terrestris, based on the International Organisation for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants (IOBC) classification. However, some can be harmful, such as the biofungicide Serenade® and the bioinsecticide Botanigard®. Therefore, it is recommended that all should be tested before use in combination with pollinators. In this context, it is also advisable that these MCAs should be evaluated in more realistic field situations for the assessment of potentially deleterious effects on foraging behaviour. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry
Keywords:Bombus terrestris  bumblebee  Binab‐T‐vector  Prestop‐Mix  Botanigard  AQ10  Serenade  Granupom  Trianum‐P  biological control  sublethal effects  survival  foraging behaviour
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号