首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于不同PSO-ELM模型的碾压黏土抗剪强度预测方法研究
引用本文:金坎辉1,杨 涛1,霍树义1,王 雷1,王诚杰1,姜 岳1,张欢灵2. 基于不同PSO-ELM模型的碾压黏土抗剪强度预测方法研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(3): 213-219+227
作者姓名:金坎辉1  杨 涛1  霍树义1  王 雷1  王诚杰1  姜 岳1  张欢灵2
作者单位:(1.河北水利电力学院/河北省岩土工程安全与变形控制重点实验室, 河北 沧州 061000; 2.中国铁路北京局集团有限公司天津工务段, 天津 300011)
摘    要:碾压黏土的抗剪强度直接影响碾压土石坝的质量和使用寿命。为得出碾压黏土抗剪强度的最优预测模型,通过粒子群算法优化极限学习机模型(PSO-ELM),分别以Sine函数、radbas函数和hardlim函数3种激活函数为基础,构建PSO-ELMsin,PSO-ELMrad和PSO-ELMhard3种模型,并将模型结果与ELM模型、广义回归神经网络模型(GRNN)、随机森林模型(RF)和BP神经网络模型进行了对比。结果表明:在黏聚力和内摩擦角的拟合结果中,PSO-ELMsin模型精度最高,其拟合方程斜率分别为1.005,1.032; 在月值模拟中,PSO-ELMsin模型与实测值的拟合度最高,相对误差仅在6.0%~9.3%; PSO-ELMsin模型在黏聚力模拟中RMSE,RRMSE,MAE,Ens和R2分别为0.776 kPa,1.80%,0.641 kPa,0.993和0.997,该模型在内摩擦角模拟中RMSE,RRMSE,MAE,Ens和R2分别为1.635°,6.98%,1.616°,0.983和0.998,模型精度均排名第一。因此,PSO-ELMsin模型在所有模型中精度最高,可作为碾压黏土抗剪强度预测的标准模型使用。

关 键 词:碾压黏土  抗剪强度  粒子群算法  极限学习机  激活函数

Research on Prediction Methods of Shear Strength of Rolled Clay Based on Different PSO-ELM Models
JIN Kanhui1,YANG Tao1,HUO Shuyi1,WANG Lei1,WANG Chengjie1,JIANG Yue1,ZHANG Huanling2. Research on Prediction Methods of Shear Strength of Rolled Clay Based on Different PSO-ELM Models[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(3): 213-219+227
Authors:JIN Kanhui1  YANG Tao1  HUO Shuyi1  WANG Lei1  WANG Chengjie1  JIANG Yue1  ZHANG Huanling2
Affiliation:(1.Hebei University of Water Resource and Electric Engineering & Hebei Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering Safety and Deformation Control, Cangzhou, HeBei 061000, China; 2.Tianjin Rail way Section of China Rail way Beijing Bureau Group CO., LTD, Tianjin 300011, China)
Abstract:The shear strength of rolled clay directly affects the quality and service life of roller compacted earth-rock dams. In order to obtain the optimal prediction model for the shear strength of rolled clay, we used particle swarm optimization to optimize the extreme learning machine model(PSO-ELM), which is based on the three activation functions of Sine function, radbas function and hardlim function to construct PSO-ELMsin, PSO-ELMrad and PSO-ELMhard. We compared the accuracy with ELM model, generalized regression neural network model(GRNN), random forest model(RF)and BP neural network model. The results show that: in the fitting results of cohesion and internal friction angle, the PSO-ELMsin model has the highest accuracy, and the slopes of the fitting equations are 1.005 and 1.032, respectively, which are closer to the standard value ‘1'; in the monthly simulation, the PSO-ELMsin model has the relative error of between 6.0% and 9.3%; RMSE, RRMSE and MAE of the PSO-ELMsin model in the conhesion simulation of the PSO-ELMsin model, the RMSE, RRMSE, MAE, Ens and R2 are 0.776 kPa, 1.80%, 0.641 kPa, 0.993 and 0.997, respectively. In the internal friction angle simulation, the RMSE, RRMSE, MAE, Ens and R2 are 1.635°, 6.98%, 1.616°, 0.983 and 0.998, respectively. The accuracy of PSO-ELMsin model ranks first. respectively. Therefore, the PSO-ELMsin model has the highest accuracy among all models and can be used as a precise model for predicting the shear strength of rolled clay.
Keywords:rolled clay  shear strength  particle swarm optimization  extreme learning machine  activation function
点击此处可从《水土保持研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号