首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

太湖地区高效除氮浮萍品种的筛选及其除氮机理的初步研究
引用本文:周影茹,袁晓燕,王俊儒,包涛芳,施卫明.太湖地区高效除氮浮萍品种的筛选及其除氮机理的初步研究[J].土壤,2010,42(3):390-397.
作者姓名:周影茹  袁晓燕  王俊儒  包涛芳  施卫明
作者单位:1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西杨凌,712100;土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室(中国科学院南京土壤研究所),南京,210008
2. 土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室(中国科学院南京土壤研究所),南京,210008
3. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西杨凌,712100
4. 宜兴市水利局,江苏宜兴,214200
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重大国际合作研究项目(30821140542)和国家科技支撑计划课题项目(2006BAD17B03)资助。
摘    要:农业面源污染是引起太湖水体富营养化的重要因素,而植物生态工程技术在面源污染的治理中起到了很大的作用。本文调查和收集了太湖地区13个稻田浮萍种质资源,研究了不同浮萍品种对低浓度稻田排水中氮(N)素的去除效果及其初步除N机理。结果表明,在实验营养条件下,4种浮萍品种中紫背浮萍(Spirodela polyrrhiza)具有最高的N去除效率,其次是少根紫萍(Spirodela oligorrhiza)或稀脉浮萍(Lemna perpusilla),而除N效果最低的品种是青萍(Lemna minor)。供试材料对水体中总N的去除率范围为57.3% ~ 85.2%,其中紫背浮萍HZ1具有最高的去除效果,15天后总N去除率可达到85%,青萍WX3去除效果最低,15天后去除率仅为57%。两个浮萍品种进行比较发现,HZ1生物量增长速度慢,鲜重和干重平均倍增时间分别为7.96天和7.82天,而WX3的鲜重和干重倍增时间分别为5.20天和4.73天。另一方面,HZ1和WX3的含N量分别为4.9% 和5.7%。由此可以推知,紫背浮萍HZ1高效除N的主要机理不是通过生物体吸收,而更可能是微生物或化学作用共同引起。

关 键 词:水体富营养化  稻田排水  浮萍  除氮途径  生物吸收

Screening Duckweed(Lemnaceae)Species for Efficient Removal of Water-Body's Nitrogen in the Tai Lake Region and Preliminary Study on Nitrogen Removal Mechanism
ZHOU Ying-ru,YUAN Xiao-yan,WANG Jun-ru,BAO Tao-fang,SHI Wei-ming.Screening Duckweed(Lemnaceae)Species for Efficient Removal of Water-Body's Nitrogen in the Tai Lake Region and Preliminary Study on Nitrogen Removal Mechanism[J].Soils,2010,42(3):390-397.
Authors:ZHOU Ying-ru  YUAN Xiao-yan  WANG Jun-ru  BAO Tao-fang  SHI Wei-ming
Institution:College of Resources and Environment, Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry
Abstract:Non-point agricultural sources are the major cause of water eutrophication in Tai Lake. Phyto-remediation techniques are playing an increasingly important role in non-point pollution research. This study compared nitrogen removal efficiency among different duckweed species growing in paddy field drainage water with low nitrogen concentrations in the Tai Lake region. Nitrogen removal efficiency declined in the order of Spirodela polyrrhiza > Spirodela oligorrhiza, Lemna perpusilla > Lemna minor, total nitrogen removal efficiency among the duckweed species in this study ranged from 57.3% to 85.2%. The removal efficiency in 15 days of HZ1 was highest (85.2%) while WX3 was 57.3%. The biomass production rates of WX3 were higher than that of HZ1, the doubling time of fresh and dry weights were 5.20 days and 4.73 days for WX3 but 7.96 days and 7.82 days for HZ1, respectively. The nitrogen contents were 4.9% and 5.7% in HZ1 and WX3, respectively, however the nitrogen removal efficiency of HZ1 was significantly higher than that of WX3. It suggests that nitrogen removal from water is due to microbial or chemical processes rather than bioaccumulation.
Keywords:Water eutrophication  Duckweed  Paddy field drainage water  Nitrogen removal pathways  Bioaccumulation
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《土壤》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土壤》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号