Forum: Social-Ecological System Archetypes for European Rangelands |
| |
Authors: | Tibor Hartel Nora Fagerholm Mario Torralba Ágnes Balázsi Tobias Plieninger |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Babes-Bolyai University, Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Strada Clinicilor 5-7, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;2. Ecosystem Service Laboratory–Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;3. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Denmark;4. Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, Finland;5. Social-Ecological Interactions in Agricultural Systems, University of Göttingen and University of Kassel, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Rangelands in Europe are imprinted by livestock production and embedded in mosaic landscapes of grasslands, croplands, woodlands, and settlements. They developed as social-ecological systems: People managed rangelands in order to maintain or enhance their ecosystem services, which in turn supported their well-being. The appreciation of ecosystem services provided by rangelands depends on the broad, socioeconomic aspirations and abilities of the managers and the capital available to achieve these aspirations. Here we propose four archetypical social-ecological system representations for European rangelands along the dimensions of socioeconomic aspirations (i.e., oriented toward conventional or sustainable production) and available financial capital (i.e., low or high) to employ farming technologies on rangelands. The four archetypes are aspiration misfit, pockets of sustainability, techno-dependence, and money dependent sustainability. We describe the landscape physiognomy, ecosystem service appreciation, and management-related synergies and trade-offs in ecosystem services supply related to each archetype and formulate a number of research questions to document and further understand them as social-ecological systems. We include the importance of urbanization, land grabbing, and institutional networks in shaping the social-ecological archetypes of rangelands and the relationship between our social-ecological archetypes and the resilience and transformability of rangelands. |
| |
Keywords: | agricultural landscape ecosystem services silvopastoralism sustainability wood-pasture |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|