Twenty-four-hour Profiles of Serum Prolactin and Luteinizing Hormone in Anoestrous Crossbred Bitches

The dynamics of prolactin (PRL) and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in the anoestrous bitch is poorly known. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize the 24 h profiles of serum PRL and LH in crossbred anoestrous bitches and to assess whether a relationship exists between the secretory patterns of these two hormones. Serum PRL and LH concentrations were measured in 10 healthy anoestrous crossbred bitches at 145 min intervals for 24 h. During the experiment the animals received continuous artificial illumination and remained undisturbed except at the time of blood sampling. Serum PRL was measured by a homologous enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay, whereas LH and progesterone (P₄) were determined by radioimmunoassay. The anoestrous state of the bitches was assessed by vaginal cytology, vaginoscopy and physical examination. Two groups of animals were identified according to their PRL levels: a high PRL group (n=3, mean ± SEM 12.3 ± 2.7 ng/ml) and a low PRL group (n=7, mean ± SEM: 2.5 ± 0.9 ng/ml). In the low PRL group, the PRL profiles were flat and did not show any significant circadian pattern. Nevertheless, occasional single‐point peaks were detected in some of the bitches. In the high PRL group the individual PRL profiles were variable. To detect the presence of a circadian change of PRL concentrations, two different sets of time windows (TW) of sampling were studied. The first set was: day TW1A, samples 1–5 (0900–1840 h)] and night TW1B, samples 6–10 (2105–0645 h)]. The second set was chosen after visual inspection of the average PRL profiles for both (high and low) groups: TW2A, samples 3–7 (1350–2330 h) and TW2B, samples 1–2 and 8–10 (0155–1125 h)]. PRL concentrations were not significantly different between day and night. In the high PRL group, but not in the low PRL group, average serum PRL was significantly (p < 0.01) higher in TW2A than TW2B. In both groups serum LH levels were more homogeneous than PRL levels. Neither TW showed circadian changes in LH patterns of secretion (TW1A versus TW1B, p < 0.69; TW2A versus TW2B, p < 0.88). On the other hand, bitches in the high PRL group showed significantly (p < 0.01) lower serum LH levels than those in the low PRL group of animals. Serum PRL concentrations presented a significant inverse correlation with LH concentrations (r=?0.21, p < 0.03) and a significant positive correlation with P₄ concentrations across the study (0.92, p < 0.01). It is concluded that in anoestrous crossbred bitches serum PRL is highly variable and inversely related to LH. No circadian rhythm of PRL secretion appears to exist in most anoestrous bitches.