基于改进TOPSIS模型的黑龙江省西部半干旱地区农业旱灾脆弱性评价

采用灰色关联度分析确定指标权重,改进TOPSIS模型,根据各评价单位无量纲数据列标准差确定灰色关联度分析中分辨系数,不计主观赋值随意性和固定性情况下,农业旱灾脆弱性评价结果客观合理。将改进模型应用于黑龙江省西部半干旱地区2009~2014年农业旱灾脆弱性评价,深度分析区域农业旱灾脆弱性时空异变,了解区域农业旱灾脆弱性影响因素。结果表明,基于改进灰色关联度分析确定指标权重值为动态值,突变数据对指标权重排序影响更具时效性;黑龙江省西部半干旱地区农业旱灾脆弱性多为重度脆弱和中度脆弱,属于极易发生旱灾地区;近年来,该区域实现粮食增产同时,合理调控区域复合体影响因素,大部分农业地区农业旱灾脆弱性强度减弱,少部分地区保持相对稳定。评价结果与实际遭受旱灾损失性质基本吻合,评价模型具有可行性和有效性,可为农业旱灾脆弱性评价提供参考。

Assessment of agricultural drought vulnerability in semi-arid region of western Heilongjiang Province based on improved TOPSIS model

Through the analysis of the deficiency of TOPSIS model,the grey incidence degree analysis to determine the index weight was be used,and then determined the resolution ratio in grey incidence degree analysis,according to the standard deviation of the dimensionless data series of each evaluation unit,excluded the subjective assignment randomness and fixity so as to make the relative similarity degree of the assessment of agricultural drought vulnerability of model calculation objective and reasonable.The improved model was applied to assess the agricultural drought vulnerability in semi-arid region of western Heilongjiang Province in 2009-2014.The spatial-temporal variation of regional agricultural drought vulnerability was analyzed in depth to understanding the influence factors of vulnerability of regional agricultural drought.The results showed that the index weights based on improved grey incidence degree analysis were dynamic values,excluding the randomness and fixity of the subjective valuation method,and synchronizing with the data,paying more attentions to the influence of the mutation data on the ranking of the index weights,which was more timeliness;in recent years,while policymakers in this region were committed to increase grain output,they controlled various aspects of the complexities of agricultural production in the region comprehensively and rationally,which caused there ducing intensity of agricultural drought vulnerability in most areas and steadily increasing grain output in a few areas.The results of the evaluation were in good agreement with the nature of drought losses actually suffered.The evaluation model was feasible and effective and could be used as a reference for the evaluation of agricultural drought vulnerability.