首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

干旱处理对毛竹光响应的影响:基于4种模型比较分析
引用本文:倪霞,曹永慧,周本智,鲁小珍,周燕. 干旱处理对毛竹光响应的影响:基于4种模型比较分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(3): 465-471
作者姓名:倪霞  曹永慧  周本智  鲁小珍  周燕
作者单位:中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所, 国家林业局钱江源森林生态系统定位观测研究站, 浙江 杭州 311400;南京林业大学, 江苏 南京 210037;中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所, 国家林业局钱江源森林生态系统定位观测研究站, 浙江 杭州 311400;中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所, 国家林业局钱江源森林生态系统定位观测研究站, 浙江 杭州 311400;南京林业大学, 江苏 南京 210037;浙江省建德市新安江林场, 浙江 建德 311600
基金项目:2014年度引进国际先进林业科学技术项目(2014-4-57);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(RISF2013002);浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY13C160002)
摘    要:[目的]采用4种模型对干旱处理下毛竹叶片光响应曲线进行拟合比较,分析各模型的优缺点,以选出适合毛竹光响应曲线拟合的最佳模型,并量化干旱处理对毛竹光合光响应的影响。[方法]主要采用Li-6400便携式光合仪测定干旱处理下毛竹的光响应曲线,并通过4种模型对其进行拟合。[结果]研究表明:(1)在干旱和对照处理下各模型的决定系数R~2均大于0.995,说明拟合精度较高。综合各参数可以看出,直角双曲线修正模型拟合效果最佳,相对误差RE平均值为0.07,而指数模型参数拟合效果最差,RE平均值为0.767;(2)通过直角双曲线修正模型拟合各光合参数,在干旱环境下,暗呼吸速率R_d、光补偿点LCP和水分利用效率WUE较高,分别为对照环境的1.57倍、1.66倍和1.06倍,而净光合速率P_(nmax)、光饱和点LSP和表观量子效率AQY分别比对照环境降低3.6%、17.6%和4.8%。[结论]从整体拟合效果来看,这4种模型拟合顺序为:直角双曲线修正模型直角双曲线模型非直角双曲线模型指数模型。通过在干旱和对照间毛竹各光合参数的比较发现,毛竹对干旱环境有一定的适应能力。

关 键 词:光响应模型  毛竹  净光合速率  光响应参数
收稿时间:2016-08-11

Light Response of Phyllostachys edulis under Drought Stress: Based on 4 Models
NI Xi,CAO Yong-hui,ZHOU Ben-zhi,LU Xiao-zhen and ZHOU Yan. Light Response of Phyllostachys edulis under Drought Stress: Based on 4 Models[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(3): 465-471
Authors:NI Xi  CAO Yong-hui  ZHOU Ben-zhi  LU Xiao-zhen  ZHOU Yan
Affiliation:Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Qianjiangyuan Forestry Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, China;Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China;Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Qianjiangyuan Forestry Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, China;Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Qianjiangyuan Forestry Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, China;Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China;Xin''anjiang Forest Center of Jiande City, Zhejiang Province, Jiande 311600, Zhejiang, China
Abstract:[Objective] In order to find out the best light-response curve model of photosynthesis and quantify the effects of drought stress on photosynthetic light response, the photosynthetic characteristics of Phyllostachys edulis under drought stress were investigated, and the advantages and disadvantages of each model were analyzed in the paper. [Method] The light-response curves of photosynthesis were measured using Li-6400 portable photosynthesis system. The light-response curves were fitted by four light response curve models of photosynthesis. [Result] (1) The coefficient of determination R2 of each model was greater than 0.995 in drought and control conditions, which indicated that the fitting accuracy was high. According to each parameters, the best fitting model was the modified rectangular hyperbolic model, with the average RE value was 0.07, while the worst fitting model was index model, with the average RE value was 0.767. (2) Estimating several photosynthetic parameters by the modified rectangular hyperbolic model, the Rd, LCP and WUE under drought stress were 1.57 times,1.66 times and 1.06 times higher than that of the control environment, respectively. However, under drought stress, Pnmax, LSP and AQY decreased by 3.6%, 17.6% and 4.8%, respectively. [Conclusion] The fitted results show that the modified rectangular hyperbolic model > rectangular hyperbolic model> non-rectangular hyperbolic model> index model. When comparing the photosynthetic parameters under drought and control conditions, Ph. edulis has good photosynthetic adaptive response to drought stress.
Keywords:light response model  Phyllostachys edulis  net photosynthetic rate  photosynthetic parameter
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《林业科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《林业科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号