| 三种微生态制剂的育雏效果对比试验 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 覃仕善,韦凤英. 三种微生态制剂的育雏效果对比试验[J]. 水禽世界, 2004, 0(11): 15-16 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 覃仕善 韦凤英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广西畜牧研究所,南宁,530001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 将1日龄银香鸡随机分成4组,即空白对照组、试验1、2、3组(分别添加0.03%益乐素、益生宝、欣益康),每组设两个重复,每个重复100只鸡,共800只。0～4周龄的试验结果试验1、2、3组4周龄体重分别为343g、364g和374g,分别比对照组的333g提高10g(差异不显著)、31g(差异显著)和41g(差异极显著);每kg饲养成本分别比对照组降低0.06元、0.47元、和0.57元;育雏成活率分别比对照组提高1.5、2.0和2.5个百分点。表明这三种微生态制剂均有不同程度的防病促长、改善饲料转化率、提高成活率和经济效益等作用。相互比较结果依次为欣益康优于益生宝优于益乐素。
|
| 关 键 词： | 微生态制剂 育雏效果 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-9755(2004)11-0015-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-10-13 |
The Effect of Three Different Probioticses on Feeding of Chicken |
| |
| QIN Shi-shan,WEI Feng-ying. The Effect of Three Different Probioticses on Feeding of Chicken[J]. Poultry Science, 2004, 0(11): 15-16 |
| |
| Authors: | QIN Shi-shan WEI Feng-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | Eight hundreds one-day-old Yingxiang-chicken were divided randomly into four groups, and every group had two repeat. Three groups(test1,2,3) were added 0.03% different probiotics in food(Yi-Le-Su, Yi-Sheng-Bao, Xin-Yi-Kang). The result of 0~4week showed that average weight on test1,2,3 divided was 343g, 364g, 374g, and control group was 333g; Feeding-cost of each 1kg divided decrease 0.06yuan, 0.47yan and 0.57yuan than control group. Survival rate divided increase 1.5percent, 2.0percent and 2.5percent than control group. |
| |
| Keywords: | probioticses the result of feeding on chicken |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
