首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

S-诱抗素和黄腐酸对干旱胁迫下皮燕麦抗旱生理特性的影响
引用本文:周海涛,张艳阳,赵孟圆,张新军,李天亮,曹丽霞,袁卉馥.S-诱抗素和黄腐酸对干旱胁迫下皮燕麦抗旱生理特性的影响[J].农学学报,2020,10(4):7-13.
作者姓名:周海涛  张艳阳  赵孟圆  张新军  李天亮  曹丽霞  袁卉馥
作者单位:1. 张家口市农业科学院,河北张家口 075000;2. 河北北方学院,河北张家口 075000
基金项目:国家燕麦荞麦产业技术体系水分生理与抗旱栽培岗位专家(CARS-08-B-04);河北省农业产业技术体系杂粮杂豆创新团队高粱与燕麦岗位(HBCT2018070204);冀西北山区农田作物免秋耕技术应用与推广(17236801D-3)
摘    要:为研究燕麦的抗旱栽培技术,本研究以皮燕麦‘冀张燕5号’为试验材料,对不同水分梯度下燕麦喷施S-诱抗素和黄腐酸,通过测定燕麦株高、叶面积(系数法)、干物质积累量(称重法)、脯氨酸含量(酸性茚三酮法)、可溶性糖含量(蒽酮比色法)、可溶性蛋白含量(考马斯亮蓝法)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性(光下还原法)、过氧化物酶(POD)活性(愈创木酚法)及过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性(紫外吸收法)等指标,利用显著性分析及隶属函数法进行综合评价。结果表明:喷施S-诱抗素和黄腐酸能提高皮燕麦的抗旱性及产量,正常供水情况下,产量分别比对照提高27.04%和9.21%;中度胁迫下,产量比对照提高25.65%和18.13%;重度胁迫下,产量比对照提高37.11%和21.10%。正常供水情况下,喷施S-诱抗素效果优于黄腐酸,受到水分胁迫时,喷施黄腐酸的效果优于S-诱抗素。

关 键 词:S-诱抗素  黄腐酸  干旱  皮燕麦  生理特性  
收稿时间:2019-03-19

S-abscisic Acid and Fulvic Acid: Effect on Oat Physiological Characteristics Under Drought Stress
Zhou Haitao,Zhang Yanyang,Zhao Mengyuan,Zhang Xinjun,Li Tianliang,Cao Lixia,Yuan Huifu.S-abscisic Acid and Fulvic Acid: Effect on Oat Physiological Characteristics Under Drought Stress[J].Journal of Agriculture,2020,10(4):7-13.
Authors:Zhou Haitao  Zhang Yanyang  Zhao Mengyuan  Zhang Xinjun  Li Tianliang  Cao Lixia  Yuan Huifu
Institution:1. Zhangjiakou City Agricultural Science Research Institute, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China;2. Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
Abstract:To study the drought-resistance cultivation technology, the oat variety ‘Jizhangyan5’ was used as material, S-abscisic acid (S-ABA) and fulvic acid were sprayed to oats under different moisture gradients. A series of indexes were determined, including oat plant height, leaf area (coefficient method), dry matter accumulation (weighing method), proline content (acid-triketone process), soluble sugar content (anthrone colorimetry), soluble protein content (Coomassie bright blue method), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (under-light reduction method), peroxidase (POD) activity (guaiacol method), catalase (CAT) activity (ultraviolet absorption method). A comparative evaluation was conducted with significance analysis and membership function method. The results showed that both S-ABA and fulvic acid improved drought resistance and yield of oat. Under normal water supply, the yield of oat increased by 27.04% and 9.21%, respectively, compared with the control. Under moderate drought stress, the yield of oat increased by 25.65% and 18.13%, respectively. Under severe drought stress, the yield of oat was raised by 37.11% and 21.10%, respectively. Under normal water supply, the effect of spraying S-ABA was better than that of fulvic acid, while under drought stress, the effect of spraying fulvic acid was better than that of S-ABA.
Keywords:S-abscisic Aacid  Fulvic Acid  Drought  Oats  Physiological Characteristics  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号