首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

区域农业景观视觉资源评价——以滦县为例
引用本文:赵志刚 谢小立 向开成 王凯荣. 区域农业景观视觉资源评价——以滦县为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(9): 281-288
作者姓名:赵志刚 谢小立 向开成 王凯荣
作者单位:1. 湖南农业大学生物科学技术学院,长沙410128;宜春学院生命科学与资源环境学院,江西宜春336000
2. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所,长沙,410125
3. 湖南农业大学生物科学技术学院,长沙,410128
4. 青岛农业大学农业生态与环境健康研究所,山东青岛,266109
基金项目:基金项目:中国科学院知识创新工程资助项目(KZCX2-YW-423);滦县1996--2020年土地利用总体规划项目.
摘    要:农业景观是中国重要的乡村景观资源,为了有效利用、建设和规划景观资源,笔者以滦县为案例,通过视觉质量和视觉敏感度对研究区域进行综合评价。视觉质量以VRM系统为基础从地貌、植被、水体、色彩、毗邻风景、视觉愉悦度等6个指标进行了评价;视觉敏感度选择相对坡度、相对视距和可视频率作为评价指标进行评价。将两种评价结果利用GIS系统等权重叠加,用自然断点法将视觉资源分为4个等级,Ⅰ级占总面积43.65%、Ⅱ级为37.21%、Ⅲ级为15.17%、Ⅳ级为3.97%。结果表明:滦县总体视觉资源较好,但中部一些乡镇景观视觉资源有待提高。

关 键 词:农业科技成果   农业科技成果   转化模式   产业   地域
收稿时间:2011-09-01
修稿时间:2011-11-02

Visual Resource Evaluation of Regional Agricultural Landscape——A Case Study of Luan Country
Zhao Zhigang , Xie Xiaoli , Xiang Kaicheng , Wang Kairong. Visual Resource Evaluation of Regional Agricultural Landscape——A Case Study of Luan Country[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(9): 281-288
Authors:Zhao Zhigang    Xie Xiaoli    Xiang Kaicheng    Wang Kairong
Affiliation:(Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128; 2CoUege of Life Science and Resources and Environment, Yichun University, Yichun Jiangxi 336000; 31nstitute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125; "Institute of Agricultural Ecology and Environmental Health, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao Shandong 266109)
Abstract:Agricultural landscape is the vital part of Chinese rural landscape resources. In order to make full use and plan landscape resources as well as build, the author took Luan Country as an example. Conclusively evaluate the study area by visual quality and visual sensitivity. Visual quality based on VRM systems that appraise on landform, vegetation, water, color, adjacent scenery and visual pleasure degrees six indicators. Visual sensitivity selected relative slope of landscape, relative distance of landscape, the visual probability of landscape as evaluation indicators. Weighted superposition two evaluates results by GIS system and so on. Through natural breaks divided visual resource into four grades. Grade I accounting 43.65% of total area, Grade Ⅱ accounting 37.21%, Grade Ⅲ accounting 15.17%, Grade Ⅳ accounting 3.97%. The results showed that Luan Country had a better overall visual resource, but a number of towns in the central that visual landscape resources need to be improved.
Keywords:agricultural landscape  visual resources  visual quality  visual sensitivity  Luan Country
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号