首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

深松机主要作业质量测试方法对比
引用本文:陈兴和,孙超,刘辉. 深松机主要作业质量测试方法对比[J]. 农业工程, 2017, 7(2): 9-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1795.2017.02.004
作者姓名:陈兴和  孙超  刘辉
作者单位:农业部农业机械试验鉴定总站,北京100122
摘    要:研究了深松机土壤膨松度和土壤扰动系数作业质量测试方法,对地表线测绘与横断面面积计算过程进行了优化,对基于激光测距技术的仪器测量方法与传统人工测量方式进行了对比试验,结果表明,仪器测量与人工测量之间无显著差异,证明提出的优化测量方法准确可靠,可以同时适用于仪器测量和人工测量过程。仪器测量的优势是能够避免人为因素对结果的影响,最大限度采集数据,显著提高测试效率、数据处理的方便性及测量结果的准确性。 

关 键 词:深松机   作业质量   土壤蓬松度   土壤扰动系数

Comparative of Main Operation Quality Test Methods for Deep Loosening Machine
Chen Xinghe,Sun Chao and Liu Hui. Comparative of Main Operation Quality Test Methods for Deep Loosening Machine[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 7(2): 9-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1795.2017.02.004
Authors:Chen Xinghe  Sun Chao  Liu Hui
Abstract:Operation quality test methods of loosening and perturbation coefficient of soil for deep loosening machine were researched.Surface mapping and calculation of cross section area were optimized.Contrastive test between instrument measurement method based on laser range finder and traditional manual measurement method was carried out.Results showed that there was no significant difference between instrument measurement and manual measurement.It was proved that the improved method was accurate and reliable.And it could be applied to both instrument measurement and manual measurement.The advantages of instrument measurement was to avoid influence of human factors on the results and collect data furthest.So it could improve test efficiency,convenience of data processing and accuracy of measurement results. 
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号