不同角色对开放获取期刊的认知度与认可度调研与分析

[目的/意义]旨在调研不同利益相关方对开放出版的态度与意见,形成对中国金色开放获取的基本共识与总体判断,以期为中国开放出版的国家政策及实施路径提供参考。[方法/过程]采用问卷调查法调研科研人员、期刊编辑、图书馆员等直接参与方对金色开放获取的认知度与认可度。[结果/结论]科研论文各相关方对金色开放获取较为欢迎,超过六成的科研人员、图书馆员、期刊编辑认为期刊论文应该开放,科研论文的阅读不应该再次收费。三方对于开放获取相关政策制订、平台建设与经费支持更为关注。开放获取更符合公共利益的最大化,随着开放获取的提出和大力推进,开放获取的未来发展趋势已经明朗,需考虑布局符合国情的相关政策及OA出版经费、平台等要素的解决路径,从而推动中国学术交流开放进程。

Investigation and Analysis of Different Roles' Recognition and Acceptance of Open Access Journals

[Purpose/Significance] In this paper, we aim to investigate different stakeholders for their attitudes about and opinions of open access publishing, in order to explore the basic consensus and make an overall judgment of China's gold open access, which is expected to serve as a reference for the national policy and implementation path of open access publishing in China. [Method/Process] We carried out a questionnaire survey to researchers, editors and librarians about their recognition and acceptance of gold open access. [Results/Conclusions] All stakeholders hold a positive attitude towards gold open access. More than 60% of researchers, journal editors and librarians support that academic papers should be open, and researchers should not be charged twice for reading these papers. The three parties all pay more attention to the policy, platform construction and financial support of open access, which plays a better role in maximizing public interests. The future development trend of open access has been cleared with the introduction and promotion of open access. It is necessary to consider solutions in line with the national conditions to elements including the relevant policies, open access publishing funds, and platforms, so as to promote the open process of academic communication in China.