首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

测定土壤硝态氮的紫外分光光度法和镉柱还原法比较
引用本文:涂 成,黄 威,陈安磊,宋 歌,陈春兰,王 卫,谢小立. 测定土壤硝态氮的紫外分光光度法和镉柱还原法比较[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(1): 147-151. DOI: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2016.01.022
作者姓名:涂 成  黄 威  陈安磊  宋 歌  陈春兰  王 卫  谢小立
作者单位:1. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所,亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,长沙 410125;中国科学院大学,北京 100049;2. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所,亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,长沙 410125;3. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所,南京,210008
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31200339)、湖南省科技计划项目(2014NK3083)和公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203030)资助
摘    要:使用改进的紫外分光光度法(校正因素法)和基于镉柱还原的流动注射分析法(镉柱还原法)测定了中国10种不同类型土壤的NO3–-N含量,分析了两种方法的差异性及其适用性。统计分析表明,改进紫外分光光度法与镉柱还原法测定的结果具有极显著的相关性,测定样品的准确度介于89%~104%,具有可比性。在浓度适用上略有差异,对NO3–-N含量极低的土壤样品,采用镉柱还原法可提高精确度;对于NO3–-N含量高的土样选用紫外法可提高测定精确度,测定结果变异性低于镉柱还原法,且紫外法测定值都要高于镉柱还原法。从仪器操作及校准角度来看,紫外法测定操作过程简便,影响因子较少,对NO3–-N批量快速测定更为适用。

关 键 词:紫外分光光度法  镉柱还原法  流动注射分析仪  土壤硝态氮
收稿时间:2015-01-20
修稿时间:2015-02-13

Comparison Between Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry and Cadmium Reduction Method in Determination of Soil Nitrate-N
TU Cheng,HUAGN Wei,CHEN An-lei,SONG Ge,CHEN Chun-lan,WANG Wei and XIE Xie-li. Comparison Between Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry and Cadmium Reduction Method in Determination of Soil Nitrate-N[J]. Soils, 2016, 48(1): 147-151. DOI: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2016.01.022
Authors:TU Cheng  HUAGN Wei  CHEN An-lei  SONG Ge  CHEN Chun-lan  WANG Wei  XIE Xie-li
Affiliation:Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Abstract:The modified UV spectrophotometry and cadmium reduction method (flow injection analysis) are two main methods applied to rapid analysis of NO3- -N. To explore the difference and application in the measurement of NO3- -N by the two methods, 10 soil samples from different regions of China were determined by the two methods. Results showed that significant correlations existed between NO3- -N contents determined by the two methods, the precision of the two methods ranged from 89% to 104%. There are difference in methods application depend on the content range, for low content of NO3- -N, cadmium reduction method was better than UV spectrophotometry in accuracy, but for high content of NO3- -N, UV spectrophotometry was better with higher precision and lower variability, and the measured value using UV spectrophotometry method were higher than that using cadmium reduction method. UV spectrophotometry was more suitable for rapid analysis of large batches of soil samples for its simple operation and less interference factors.
Keywords:UV spectrophotometry   Cadmium reduction method   Flow injection analysis   NO3--N
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《土壤》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土壤》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号