The effects of dietary protein and lipid on growth and body composition of juvenile and sub-adult red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus (Poey, 1860)

To allow for the initial identification of practical diet formulations for red snapper culture, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding varying levels of dietary protein and lipid on growth and body composition of juvenile and sub‐adult red snapper. Twelve diets were formulated to contain varying levels of dietary protein and lipid. In trial 1, juvenile red snapper (initial mean weight 5.9 g) were offered diets with graded levels of dietary protein (32%, 36%, 40%, 44%) and practical energy to protein ratios. In trial 2, juvenile red snapper (initial mean weight 8.64 g) were offered isonitrogenous diets (44% protein) containing graded levels of dietary lipid (8%, 10%, 12%, 14%). Sub‐adult fish (initial mean weight 151.5 g) were used in trial 3 and maintained on diets similar to those of trial 1 (32–44% protein). Sub‐adult fish (initial mean weight 178.3 g) in trial 4 were offered isonitrogenous diets containing 32% dietary protein and graded levels of dietary lipid (6%, 8%, 10%, 12%). There were no significant differences in growth, feed efficiency ratio (FER) or survival in juvenile fish. Juvenile fish offered 32% dietary protein exhibited a significantly greater (P=0.0497) protein conversion efficiency (PCE) than fish offered a diet containing 44% dietary protein. Juvenile fish in trial 2 also had significantly higher (P=0.005) intraperitoneal fat ratios (IPFRs) at 14% dietary lipid than fish offered diets containing 8–10% dietary lipid, and displayed trends towards greater protein as a percent of whole‐body composition at 8–10% dietary lipid. Sub‐adult snapper in trials 3 and 4 showed no significant differences in growth, FER or survival. However, in trial 4 there was a general trend towards increased % weight gain (P=0.0615), FER (P=0.0601) and final mean weight (P=0.0596) with increasing levels of dietary lipid. Fish in trial 4 offered 6% dietary lipid also had significantly lower (P=0.0439) IPFR and PCE (P=0.0188) than fish offered 12% dietary lipid. Based on data obtained from these trials, inclusion of dietary protein at levels of 32–36% appears sufficient to support growth. For this level of protein, dietary lipid should be ～10% in order to meet the energetic demands of the fish and to spare dietary protein for growth.