首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Methods to prioritize placement of riparian buffers for improved water quality
Authors:Mark D Tomer  Michael G Dosskey  Michael R Burkart  David E James  Matthew J Helmers  Dean E Eisenhauer
Institution:(1) USDA/ARS National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2110 University Blvd., Ames, IA 50011, USA;(2) USDA/FS National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, NE, USA;(3) Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA;(4) Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA
Abstract:Agroforestry buffers in riparian zones can improve stream water quality, provided they intercept and remove contaminants from surface runoff and/or shallow groundwater. Soils, topography, surficial geology, and hydrology determine the capability of forest buffers to intercept and treat these flows. This paper describes two landscape analysis techniques for identifying and mapping locations where agroforestry buffers can effectively improve water quality. One technique employs soil survey information to rank soil map units for how effectively a buffer, when sited on them, would trap sediment from adjacent cropped fields. Results allow soil map units to be compared for relative effectiveness of buffers for improving water quality and, thereby, to prioritize locations for buffer establishment. A second technique uses topographic and streamflow information to help identify locations where buffers are most likely to intercept water moving towards streams. For example, the topographic wetness index, an indicator of potential soil saturation on given terrain, identifies where buffers can readily intercept surface runoff and/or shallow groundwater flows. Maps based on this index can be useful for site-specific buffer placement at farm and small-watershed scales. A case study utilizing this technique shows that riparian forests likely have the greatest potential to improve water quality along first-order streams, rather than larger streams. The two methods are complementary and could be combined, pending the outcome of future research. Both approaches also use data that are publicly available in the US. The information can guide projects and programs at scales ranging from farm-scale planning to regional policy implementation.
Keywords:Conservation planning  Conservation practices  Non-point pollution  Soil survey  Terrain analyses
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号