首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

三种种植模式水土保持能力的比较
引用本文:王元国,谢光新,王新洋.三种种植模式水土保持能力的比较[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(3):26-28.
作者姓名:王元国  谢光新  王新洋
作者单位:铜仁职业技术学院,贵州,铜仁,554300;松桃县蓼皋镇农业技术推广站,贵州,松桃,554100
摘    要:为了探讨种草、种树、种粮食作物3种不同植被对土壤流失量的影响,试验比较了坡地不同种植模式保持水土能力的差异。结果表明:从生态角度分析,种植树木保持水土的能力最好;从经济角度分析,种植优良牧草的小区不仅生物产量最高,而且经济效益也最高,粮食作物小麦玉米轮作的经济效益次之。

关 键 词:水土保持  种植模式  流失量  生物量
文章编号:1001-3601(2006)03-0103-0026-03
收稿时间:2005-08-09
修稿时间:2005-08-092006-03-17

Comparison Among Water and Soil Holding Capacities of Three Different Planting Patterns
WANG Yuan-guo,XIE Guang-xin,WANG Xin-yang.Comparison Among Water and Soil Holding Capacities of Three Different Planting Patterns[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2006,34(3):26-28.
Authors:WANG Yuan-guo  XIE Guang-xin  WANG Xin-yang
Institution:1. Tongren College of Vocational Technology, Tongren , Guizhou 554300; 2. Liaogao Station for Popularizing Agricultural Technique, Son gtao , Guizhou 554100, China
Abstract:The experiment of three different planting patterns on the slope land was tested to investigate their water and soil holding capacities.The results show that the water and soil holding capacity of planting trees is best from ecological angles,and the water and soil holding capacity of planting forage grass can not only have the highest biomass,but also gain the best economic benefit and the benefit of rotating wheat and maize is secondary.
Keywords:water and soil conservation  planting pattern  run off  biomass
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号