首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

玉米测验种类别的比较研究
引用本文:李小琴,刘纪麟.玉米测验种类别的比较研究[J].华南农业大学学报,1996,17(2):12-16.
作者姓名:李小琴  刘纪麟
作者单位:华南农业大学农学系,华中农业大学农学系
摘    要:试验对玉米三类测验种(综合种、单交种、自交系)测定待测系一般配合力(GCA)的测定效果进行了比较研究。结果表明,在测定产量GCA时,测验种的类别是筛选优良测验种的一个重要参考指标。综合种是较优良的测验种类别,它们基本上都可单独用作测验种;单交种、自交系经严格筛选也能选到优良测验种。在测定农艺性状GCA时一般不必对测验种作严格筛选。

关 键 词:配合力  玉米  测定

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TESTER CLASSES IN MAIZE
Li Xiaoqin,Liu Jiling.COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TESTER CLASSES IN MAIZE[J].Journal of South China Agricultural University,1996,17(2):12-16.
Authors:Li Xiaoqin  Liu Jiling
Abstract:Effects of three types of tester in maize which evaluated general combining ability(GCA) of the testing-iine were strdied comparatively.The results indicated that aester classes were an inportant reference inder for screeing superiou tester when GCA of yield was tesed.The syn-thetic variety was tested.The synthetic variety was a sort of good teser and generally could be used alone as tester.Superior tester could be obtained from the serious choice of interlinear hybrid and inbreed.Generally,the esrious chice for tester wasn't necessary when the GCA of the agricultural characters was tested.
Keywords:tester  classes  general comhining ability  maize  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《华南农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《华南农业大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号