Bimodal effect of methylenedioxyphenyl compounds on detoxifying enzymes in the housefly

Thirteen methylenedioxyphenyl (MDP) compounds, including commercial insecticide synergists and juvenile hormone analogs, were compared in their effect on detoxifying enzymes in the housefly (Musca domestica). Flies were fed a diet containing 1% of the compounds for 3 days. Enzymes were then assayed in vitro for their activity using aldrin and DDT as substrates. Piperonyl butoxide (PB), sesamex, propyl isome, sulfoxide, safrole, isosafrole, 6,7-epoxy-3,7-diethyl-1-3-4(methylenedioxy) phenoxy]-2-octene (MDP-JH I) and 6,7-epoxy-3-methyl-7-ethyl-1-3,4-(methylenedioxy) phenoxy]-2-octene (MDP-JH II) all caused a bimodal effect, inhibiting microsomal epoxidase and inducing DDT-dehydrochlorinase in the resistant Isolan-B strain. Two of these, PB and MDP-JH I, gave similar results with the susceptible strain, stw;w⁵ and two resistant strains, Fc-B and Orlando-DDT. However, o-safrole, piperonylic acid, piperonal, 3,4-methylenedioxybenzyl acetate and methyl-(3,4-methylenedioxy) benzoate had little or no effect on the enzyme systems studied. The standard susceptible strain (WHO-SRS) responded to these compounds very differently. Among those tested, piperonyl butoxide, sesamex, safrole, and isosafrole were inducers of microsomal epoxidase, a 4-fold increase occurring after treatment with sesamex. Only MDP-JH II showed a marked inhibition of the epoxidase. These treatments did not effect DDT-dehydrochlorinase activity in this strain.The enhancement of DDT-dehydrochlorinase activity by the MDP compounds is associated with an increased rate of DDT dehydrochlorination in vivo. The stimulatory effect could be blocked by treatment with actinomycin D or cycloheximide.